使用手持式自定位多普勒产品的超声气泡等级与2D心脏超声之间的一致性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.28920/dhm52.4.281-285
Oscar Plogmark, Carl Hjelte, Magnus Ekström, Oskar Frånberg
{"title":"使用手持式自定位多普勒产品的超声气泡等级与2D心脏超声之间的一致性。","authors":"Oscar Plogmark, Carl Hjelte, Magnus Ekström, Oskar Frånberg","doi":"10.28920/dhm52.4.281-285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravascular bubble load after decompression can be detected and scored using ultrasound techniques that measure venous gas emboli (VGE). The aim of this study was to analyse the agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades from a handheld self-positioning product, the O'Dive™, and cardiac 2D ultrasound after decompression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VGE were graded with both bilateral subclavian vein Doppler ultrasound (modified Spencer scale) and 2D cardiac images (Eftedal Brubakk scale). Agreement was analysed using weighted kappa (Kw). Analysis with Kw was made for all paired grades, including measurements with and without zero grades, and for each method's highest grades after each dive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 dives yielded 1,113 paired measurements. The Kw agreement between ultrasound VGE grades produced by cardiac 2D images and those from the O'Dive was 'fair'; when zero grades were excluded the agreement was 'poor'. The O'Dive was found to have a lower sensitivity to detect VGE compared to 2D cardiac image scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to 2D cardiac image ultrasound, the O'Dive yielded generally lower VGE grades, which resulted in a low level of agreement (fair to poor) with Kw.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"52 4","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades using a handheld self-positioning Doppler product and 2D cardiac ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Plogmark, Carl Hjelte, Magnus Ekström, Oskar Frånberg\",\"doi\":\"10.28920/dhm52.4.281-285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intravascular bubble load after decompression can be detected and scored using ultrasound techniques that measure venous gas emboli (VGE). The aim of this study was to analyse the agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades from a handheld self-positioning product, the O'Dive™, and cardiac 2D ultrasound after decompression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VGE were graded with both bilateral subclavian vein Doppler ultrasound (modified Spencer scale) and 2D cardiac images (Eftedal Brubakk scale). Agreement was analysed using weighted kappa (Kw). Analysis with Kw was made for all paired grades, including measurements with and without zero grades, and for each method's highest grades after each dive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 dives yielded 1,113 paired measurements. The Kw agreement between ultrasound VGE grades produced by cardiac 2D images and those from the O'Dive was 'fair'; when zero grades were excluded the agreement was 'poor'. The O'Dive was found to have a lower sensitivity to detect VGE compared to 2D cardiac image scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to 2D cardiac image ultrasound, the O'Dive yielded generally lower VGE grades, which resulted in a low level of agreement (fair to poor) with Kw.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"281-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm52.4.281-285\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm52.4.281-285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:减压后的血管内气泡负荷可以通过测量静脉气体栓塞(VGE)的超声技术进行检测和评分。本研究的目的是分析手持式自定位产品O’Dive的超声波气泡等级之间的一致性™, 以及减压后的心脏2D超声。方法:采用双侧锁骨下静脉多普勒超声(改良Spencer量表)和二维心脏图像(Eftedal-Brubakk量表)对VGE进行分级。使用加权kappa(Kw)分析一致性。对所有配对等级进行了Kw分析,包括有无零等级的测量,以及每次潜水后每种方法的最高等级。结果:共有152次潜水获得1113次配对测量。心脏2D图像产生的超声VGE等级与O’Dive图像产生的超声波VGE等级之间的Kw一致性是“公平的”;当零分被排除在外时,协议是“糟糕的”。与2D心脏图像评分相比,O’Dive检测VGE的灵敏度较低。结论:与2D心脏图像超声相比,O’Dive的VGE等级通常较低,这导致与Kw的一致性较低(从一般到较差)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades using a handheld self-positioning Doppler product and 2D cardiac ultrasound.

Introduction: Intravascular bubble load after decompression can be detected and scored using ultrasound techniques that measure venous gas emboli (VGE). The aim of this study was to analyse the agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades from a handheld self-positioning product, the O'Dive™, and cardiac 2D ultrasound after decompression.

Methods: VGE were graded with both bilateral subclavian vein Doppler ultrasound (modified Spencer scale) and 2D cardiac images (Eftedal Brubakk scale). Agreement was analysed using weighted kappa (Kw). Analysis with Kw was made for all paired grades, including measurements with and without zero grades, and for each method's highest grades after each dive.

Results: A total of 152 dives yielded 1,113 paired measurements. The Kw agreement between ultrasound VGE grades produced by cardiac 2D images and those from the O'Dive was 'fair'; when zero grades were excluded the agreement was 'poor'. The O'Dive was found to have a lower sensitivity to detect VGE compared to 2D cardiac image scoring.

Conclusions: Compared to 2D cardiac image ultrasound, the O'Dive yielded generally lower VGE grades, which resulted in a low level of agreement (fair to poor) with Kw.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic emission, an innovative diagnosis tool for therapeutic hyperbaric chambers: or how to requalify safely using pneumatic pressure test. Arterial dissection in scuba divers: a potential adverse manifestation of the physiological effects of immersion. Bispectral index with density spectral array (BIS-DSA) monitoring in a patient with inner ear and cerebral decompression sickness. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Hyperbaric medicine and climate footprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1