交变载荷下页岩气井水泥环密封失效机理及控制方法研究

Shiming Zhou, Rengguang Liu, Q. Tao, Peiqing Lu, Xiaojiang Li
{"title":"交变载荷下页岩气井水泥环密封失效机理及控制方法研究","authors":"Shiming Zhou, Rengguang Liu, Q. Tao, Peiqing Lu, Xiaojiang Li","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19481-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The continuously annulus pressure phenomenon is prominent in shale gas wells in China, which brings great challenges to safe and efficient development of shale gas. The main reason for the phenomenon is the sealing failure of cement sheath and one of important factors causing sealing failure of cement sheath is the alternating loading induced by massive hydraulic fracturing and wellbore temperature variation. Therefore, it is urgent to study the sealling failure mechanism under alternating stress, establish judging criteria for sealling failure and propose sealing controlling method. Triaxial stress instrument was used to test the mechanical properties of cement for cyclic loads under 5 different stress levels, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. The sealing evaluation device of full size cement sheath was developed to test the sealling of cement sheath under alternating dynamic loadding and the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. The results showed that there was residual strain in cement after unloading and the accumulated residual strain increased with the increasing of cycle loading times. The model of residual strain was formed by fitting based on the large number of test results. Sealing failure occurred in the cement sheath after repeatedly alternating stress, which occurred in the unloading stage. Plastic deformation occurred in cement sheath under high loading, and residual strain was formed after unloading because the plastic deformation could not recover completely. Therefore, the deformation on the cement sheath interfaces was incompatible. The residual strain increased with the increase times of alternating stress same as that of the cement under cycle loading. The sealing failed when the accumulated residual strain exceeded the ultimate interface strain of the cement sheath interface and the cementation failure occurred. The judging criteria for sealing failure of cement sheath was proposed based on the fitted residual strain model. By reducing elastic modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the residual strain can be reduced under alternating stress. The sealing evaluation result showed that the sealing was enhanced of high-strength elastic cement sheath. So the sealing controlling method for cement sheath seal was formed.\n Shale gas reservoirs belong to low-porosity and low-permeability gas reservoirs. Horizontal drilling and staged fracturing technologies are commonly used to achieve cost-effective development of such reservoirs (Fisher et al., 2004; Mayerhofer et al., 2010; Lin and Ma, 2015; Zhou et al., 2016). Although these wells had good cementing quality and no annulus pressure phenomenon occurred after cementing, sustained annulus pressure appeared after fracturing. The annulus pressure affects shale gas exploitation and brings about the problem of safety and environmental protection. Therefore, it is very necessary to study the sealing integrity of cement sheath under dynamic loading simulating staged fracturing. Many scholars have studied the sealing properties of cement sheath. Goodwin and Crook devised a test model to determine the effects of excessive pressure or temperature changes on cement sheaths. They considered that exposure of casing to excessive temperature increases or internal test pressures caused diametrical and circumferential casing expansion. This circumferential force created a shearing force on the cement/casing interface, causing failure on the interface or radial fracturing of the cement sheath from the inner casing surface to the outer casing (Goodwin & Crook,1992). Jackson and Murphey designed an experiment to test the gas channeling through a cement sheath under various inner casing pressures. After the cement paste hardened, the inner casing pressures were increased gradually to measure whether gas channeling occurred with the gas pressure differential of 0.69 MPa (Jackson & Murphey, 1993). Li et al. designed a physical experiment to simulate the casing program, down-hole temperature and pressure environments, continuous changes in the inner casing pressure and to create a bearing process equivalent to that of the actual cement sheath under changing working conditions in order to explore cement sheath failure mechanisms (Li et al., 2016). But there wasn’t good bonding in the interface between cement sheath and simulation borehole, which is very important to the study of the sealing integrity of cement sheath. All of the above-mentioned researchers studied the sealing performance under the one time loading and unloading or heating and cooling, and none of them considered complex subsurface conditions for example multiple loading and unloading to simulate the multi-stage fracturing.\n Albawi and Andrade et al. generated induced stresses on the cement sheath and observed a breakthrough flow channel in the cement sheath. But they failed to consider the influence of the confinement pressure (Albawi et al., 2014; De Andrade et al., 2014, 2015). Yuan et al. developed a simulation experiment that placed a casing inside an outer resin cylinder and then poured cement paste into the annular space to study the integrity of the cement sheath under low cycle fatigue loads. This experiment applied direct axial pressure on the casing, which induced radial deformation on the cement sheath, with radial crack appeared in the cement sheath and tensile failure occurred at last. But the confinement of the experiment was too weak to simulate the constraint condition from the hard shale formation (Yuan et al., 2013). As for the mechanical properties of cement, Teodoriu (2012) conducted systematic test and studies on Grade G cement, and the studies of some other specialists mainly focus on the mechanical properties of modified cement (Benge et al., 1982; Le Roy-Delage 2000; Morris 2003; Wehling 2008; Paula et al., 2014; Quercia, 2016)\n Therefore, the mechanical properties of cement was tested under cyclic loads, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. Full size evaluation device of cement sheath sealing was developed to test the cement sheath sealing under alternating dynamic loading. Combination the testing results of cement mechanical properties with sealing, the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. By reducing elasticity modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the sealing controlling method was proposed for cement sheath.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Failure Mechanism of Cement Sheath Sealing of Shale Gas Well Under Alternating Loading and the Controlling Method\",\"authors\":\"Shiming Zhou, Rengguang Liu, Q. Tao, Peiqing Lu, Xiaojiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/IPTC-19481-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The continuously annulus pressure phenomenon is prominent in shale gas wells in China, which brings great challenges to safe and efficient development of shale gas. The main reason for the phenomenon is the sealing failure of cement sheath and one of important factors causing sealing failure of cement sheath is the alternating loading induced by massive hydraulic fracturing and wellbore temperature variation. Therefore, it is urgent to study the sealling failure mechanism under alternating stress, establish judging criteria for sealling failure and propose sealing controlling method. Triaxial stress instrument was used to test the mechanical properties of cement for cyclic loads under 5 different stress levels, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. The sealing evaluation device of full size cement sheath was developed to test the sealling of cement sheath under alternating dynamic loadding and the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. The results showed that there was residual strain in cement after unloading and the accumulated residual strain increased with the increasing of cycle loading times. The model of residual strain was formed by fitting based on the large number of test results. Sealing failure occurred in the cement sheath after repeatedly alternating stress, which occurred in the unloading stage. Plastic deformation occurred in cement sheath under high loading, and residual strain was formed after unloading because the plastic deformation could not recover completely. Therefore, the deformation on the cement sheath interfaces was incompatible. The residual strain increased with the increase times of alternating stress same as that of the cement under cycle loading. The sealing failed when the accumulated residual strain exceeded the ultimate interface strain of the cement sheath interface and the cementation failure occurred. The judging criteria for sealing failure of cement sheath was proposed based on the fitted residual strain model. By reducing elastic modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the residual strain can be reduced under alternating stress. The sealing evaluation result showed that the sealing was enhanced of high-strength elastic cement sheath. So the sealing controlling method for cement sheath seal was formed.\\n Shale gas reservoirs belong to low-porosity and low-permeability gas reservoirs. Horizontal drilling and staged fracturing technologies are commonly used to achieve cost-effective development of such reservoirs (Fisher et al., 2004; Mayerhofer et al., 2010; Lin and Ma, 2015; Zhou et al., 2016). Although these wells had good cementing quality and no annulus pressure phenomenon occurred after cementing, sustained annulus pressure appeared after fracturing. The annulus pressure affects shale gas exploitation and brings about the problem of safety and environmental protection. Therefore, it is very necessary to study the sealing integrity of cement sheath under dynamic loading simulating staged fracturing. Many scholars have studied the sealing properties of cement sheath. Goodwin and Crook devised a test model to determine the effects of excessive pressure or temperature changes on cement sheaths. They considered that exposure of casing to excessive temperature increases or internal test pressures caused diametrical and circumferential casing expansion. This circumferential force created a shearing force on the cement/casing interface, causing failure on the interface or radial fracturing of the cement sheath from the inner casing surface to the outer casing (Goodwin & Crook,1992). Jackson and Murphey designed an experiment to test the gas channeling through a cement sheath under various inner casing pressures. After the cement paste hardened, the inner casing pressures were increased gradually to measure whether gas channeling occurred with the gas pressure differential of 0.69 MPa (Jackson & Murphey, 1993). Li et al. designed a physical experiment to simulate the casing program, down-hole temperature and pressure environments, continuous changes in the inner casing pressure and to create a bearing process equivalent to that of the actual cement sheath under changing working conditions in order to explore cement sheath failure mechanisms (Li et al., 2016). But there wasn’t good bonding in the interface between cement sheath and simulation borehole, which is very important to the study of the sealing integrity of cement sheath. All of the above-mentioned researchers studied the sealing performance under the one time loading and unloading or heating and cooling, and none of them considered complex subsurface conditions for example multiple loading and unloading to simulate the multi-stage fracturing.\\n Albawi and Andrade et al. generated induced stresses on the cement sheath and observed a breakthrough flow channel in the cement sheath. But they failed to consider the influence of the confinement pressure (Albawi et al., 2014; De Andrade et al., 2014, 2015). Yuan et al. developed a simulation experiment that placed a casing inside an outer resin cylinder and then poured cement paste into the annular space to study the integrity of the cement sheath under low cycle fatigue loads. This experiment applied direct axial pressure on the casing, which induced radial deformation on the cement sheath, with radial crack appeared in the cement sheath and tensile failure occurred at last. But the confinement of the experiment was too weak to simulate the constraint condition from the hard shale formation (Yuan et al., 2013). As for the mechanical properties of cement, Teodoriu (2012) conducted systematic test and studies on Grade G cement, and the studies of some other specialists mainly focus on the mechanical properties of modified cement (Benge et al., 1982; Le Roy-Delage 2000; Morris 2003; Wehling 2008; Paula et al., 2014; Quercia, 2016)\\n Therefore, the mechanical properties of cement was tested under cyclic loads, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. Full size evaluation device of cement sheath sealing was developed to test the cement sheath sealing under alternating dynamic loading. Combination the testing results of cement mechanical properties with sealing, the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. By reducing elasticity modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the sealing controlling method was proposed for cement sheath.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19481-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19481-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中国页岩气井环空压力持续现象突出,给页岩气的安全高效开发带来了巨大挑战。造成这种现象的主要原因是水泥环的密封破坏,而造成水泥环密封破坏的重要因素之一是大规模水力压裂和井筒温度变化引起的交变载荷。因此,迫切需要研究交变应力作用下的密封破坏机理,建立密封破坏的判断标准,提出密封控制方法。采用三轴应力仪测试了5种不同应力水平下循环荷载作用下水泥的力学性能,并在此基础上拟合得到了残余应变模型。研制了全尺寸水泥环密封性评价装置,对水泥环在交变动载荷作用下的密封性进行了试验研究,形成了水泥环密封性破坏规律。结果表明:卸载后水泥中存在残余应变,且累积残余应变随循环加载次数的增加而增大;在大量试验结果的基础上,通过拟合建立了残余应变模型。反复交变应力后,水泥环发生密封破坏,发生在卸载阶段。水泥环在高载荷作用下发生塑性变形,卸载后由于塑性变形不能完全恢复,形成残余应变。因此,水泥环界面上的变形是不相容的。残余应变随交变应力次数的增加而增大,与循环加载下水泥的情况相同。当累计残余应变超过水泥环界面极限界面应变时,发生胶结破坏。基于拟合的残余应变模型,提出了水泥环密封失效的判断准则。通过降低水泥的弹性模量,保持水泥的高强度,可以降低交变应力下的残余应变。密封评价结果表明,高强度弹性水泥护套增强了密封性能。形成了水泥环密封的密封控制方法。页岩气藏属于低孔低渗气藏。水平钻井和分段压裂技术通常用于实现此类油藏的经济高效开发(Fisher et al., 2004;Mayerhofer等,2010;Lin and Ma, 2015;Zhou et al., 2016)。这些井固井质量良好,固井后未出现环空压力现象,但压裂后出现了持续的环空压力。环空压力影响页岩气开采,带来安全环保问题。因此,对模拟分段压裂动载荷下水泥环的密封完整性进行研究是十分必要的。许多学者对水泥环的密封性能进行了研究。Goodwin和Crook设计了一个测试模型来确定过高的压力或温度变化对水泥护套的影响。他们认为套管暴露在过高的温度升高或内部测试压力下会导致套管的直径和周向膨胀。这种环向力在水泥/套管界面上产生了剪切力,导致水泥环从内套管表面到外套管的界面失效或径向破裂(Goodwin & Crook,1992)。Jackson和murphy设计了一个实验来测试在不同的内套管压力下气体穿过水泥环的情况。水泥浆硬化后,逐渐增加套管压力,测量是否发生气窜,气压差为0.69 MPa (Jackson & murphy, 1993)。Li等人设计了物理实验,模拟了套管程序、井下温度和压力环境、内套管压力的持续变化,并创建了一个与实际工作条件变化下水泥环的承载过程相当的过程,以探索水泥环的破坏机制(Li et al., 2016)。但水泥环与模拟井眼的界面并没有很好的粘结,这对研究水泥环的密封完整性具有重要意义。上述研究均研究了一次加载卸载或加热冷却条件下的密封性能,均未考虑多次加载卸载等复杂地下条件来模拟多级压裂。Albawi和Andrade等人在水泥环上产生了诱导应力,并在水泥环中观察到一个突破的流动通道。但他们没有考虑约束压力的影响(Albawi等)。 , 2014;De Andrade et al., 2014,2015)。Yuan等人开发了一种模拟实验,将套管放入外树脂筒中,然后将水泥浆倒入环空空间,以研究低周疲劳载荷下水泥环的完整性。本试验对套管施加直接轴向压力,导致水泥环发生径向变形,水泥环出现径向裂缝,最终发生拉伸破坏。但实验的局限性太弱,无法模拟来自硬页岩地层的约束条件(Yuan et al., 2013)。对于水泥的力学性能,Teodoriu(2012)对G级水泥进行了系统的试验和研究,其他一些专家的研究主要集中在改性水泥的力学性能上(Benge et al., 1982;Le Roy-Delage 2000;莫里斯2003;皮特医生2008;Paula et al., 2014;Quercia, 2016)因此,对水泥在循环荷载下的力学性能进行了测试,并在此基础上拟合得到了残余应变模型。研制了水泥环密封全尺寸试验装置,对水泥环在交变动荷载作用下的密封性能进行了试验研究。结合水泥力学性能与密封试验结果,形成了水泥环密封失效规律。提出了降低水泥弹性模量、保持水泥高强度的水泥环密封控制方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on Failure Mechanism of Cement Sheath Sealing of Shale Gas Well Under Alternating Loading and the Controlling Method
The continuously annulus pressure phenomenon is prominent in shale gas wells in China, which brings great challenges to safe and efficient development of shale gas. The main reason for the phenomenon is the sealing failure of cement sheath and one of important factors causing sealing failure of cement sheath is the alternating loading induced by massive hydraulic fracturing and wellbore temperature variation. Therefore, it is urgent to study the sealling failure mechanism under alternating stress, establish judging criteria for sealling failure and propose sealing controlling method. Triaxial stress instrument was used to test the mechanical properties of cement for cyclic loads under 5 different stress levels, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. The sealing evaluation device of full size cement sheath was developed to test the sealling of cement sheath under alternating dynamic loadding and the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. The results showed that there was residual strain in cement after unloading and the accumulated residual strain increased with the increasing of cycle loading times. The model of residual strain was formed by fitting based on the large number of test results. Sealing failure occurred in the cement sheath after repeatedly alternating stress, which occurred in the unloading stage. Plastic deformation occurred in cement sheath under high loading, and residual strain was formed after unloading because the plastic deformation could not recover completely. Therefore, the deformation on the cement sheath interfaces was incompatible. The residual strain increased with the increase times of alternating stress same as that of the cement under cycle loading. The sealing failed when the accumulated residual strain exceeded the ultimate interface strain of the cement sheath interface and the cementation failure occurred. The judging criteria for sealing failure of cement sheath was proposed based on the fitted residual strain model. By reducing elastic modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the residual strain can be reduced under alternating stress. The sealing evaluation result showed that the sealing was enhanced of high-strength elastic cement sheath. So the sealing controlling method for cement sheath seal was formed. Shale gas reservoirs belong to low-porosity and low-permeability gas reservoirs. Horizontal drilling and staged fracturing technologies are commonly used to achieve cost-effective development of such reservoirs (Fisher et al., 2004; Mayerhofer et al., 2010; Lin and Ma, 2015; Zhou et al., 2016). Although these wells had good cementing quality and no annulus pressure phenomenon occurred after cementing, sustained annulus pressure appeared after fracturing. The annulus pressure affects shale gas exploitation and brings about the problem of safety and environmental protection. Therefore, it is very necessary to study the sealing integrity of cement sheath under dynamic loading simulating staged fracturing. Many scholars have studied the sealing properties of cement sheath. Goodwin and Crook devised a test model to determine the effects of excessive pressure or temperature changes on cement sheaths. They considered that exposure of casing to excessive temperature increases or internal test pressures caused diametrical and circumferential casing expansion. This circumferential force created a shearing force on the cement/casing interface, causing failure on the interface or radial fracturing of the cement sheath from the inner casing surface to the outer casing (Goodwin & Crook,1992). Jackson and Murphey designed an experiment to test the gas channeling through a cement sheath under various inner casing pressures. After the cement paste hardened, the inner casing pressures were increased gradually to measure whether gas channeling occurred with the gas pressure differential of 0.69 MPa (Jackson & Murphey, 1993). Li et al. designed a physical experiment to simulate the casing program, down-hole temperature and pressure environments, continuous changes in the inner casing pressure and to create a bearing process equivalent to that of the actual cement sheath under changing working conditions in order to explore cement sheath failure mechanisms (Li et al., 2016). But there wasn’t good bonding in the interface between cement sheath and simulation borehole, which is very important to the study of the sealing integrity of cement sheath. All of the above-mentioned researchers studied the sealing performance under the one time loading and unloading or heating and cooling, and none of them considered complex subsurface conditions for example multiple loading and unloading to simulate the multi-stage fracturing. Albawi and Andrade et al. generated induced stresses on the cement sheath and observed a breakthrough flow channel in the cement sheath. But they failed to consider the influence of the confinement pressure (Albawi et al., 2014; De Andrade et al., 2014, 2015). Yuan et al. developed a simulation experiment that placed a casing inside an outer resin cylinder and then poured cement paste into the annular space to study the integrity of the cement sheath under low cycle fatigue loads. This experiment applied direct axial pressure on the casing, which induced radial deformation on the cement sheath, with radial crack appeared in the cement sheath and tensile failure occurred at last. But the confinement of the experiment was too weak to simulate the constraint condition from the hard shale formation (Yuan et al., 2013). As for the mechanical properties of cement, Teodoriu (2012) conducted systematic test and studies on Grade G cement, and the studies of some other specialists mainly focus on the mechanical properties of modified cement (Benge et al., 1982; Le Roy-Delage 2000; Morris 2003; Wehling 2008; Paula et al., 2014; Quercia, 2016) Therefore, the mechanical properties of cement was tested under cyclic loads, based on these the residual strain model was obtained by fitting. Full size evaluation device of cement sheath sealing was developed to test the cement sheath sealing under alternating dynamic loading. Combination the testing results of cement mechanical properties with sealing, the failure rule of cement sheath sealing was formed. By reducing elasticity modulus and maintaining the high strength of cement, the sealing controlling method was proposed for cement sheath.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Modified Plane of Weakness Method Enables Drilling Horizontal Wells Successfully in Ordos Basin, China A Practical Method to Match Trajectories of a Horizontal Well in Time Domain and in Depth in Ancient Buried Hill 3D Permeability Characterization Based on Pore Structure Analysis and Multi-Parameters Seismic Inversion and Its Application in H Oilfield Research and Application on Intensive Drilling Model of Large Platforms Disclose Hidden Hydrocarbon HC Reserves from Additional Zone of Interest AZIs Using dT LogR Method in Lunar Field, Gulf of Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1