意大利收容寻求庇护者的制度演变为收容“非主体”的“非场所”

Ivana Acocella
{"title":"意大利收容寻求庇护者的制度演变为收容“非主体”的“非场所”","authors":"Ivana Acocella","doi":"10.3280/mm2022-001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a critical analysis of the evolution of the Italian migrant reception system following the 2014 \"refugee crisis\". The aim is to demonstrate how the touted goal of discouraging so-called \"bogus asylum seekers\" or \"fraudulent economic migrants\" has been used to institutionalize the Emergency Reception Centres (CAS) as the ordinary place to host asylum seekers, while the ordinary reception system has been greatly weakened. Furthermore, this process to institutionalize the CASs has been accompanied by the progressive distancing of the regulations for these facilities from the decentralized and dispersed model sought in the ordinary reception system. The reflection is based on a comparative analysis of the tendering procedures to allocate the emergency reception services drawn up by the Prefectures of Florence, Siena and Arezzo between 2015 and 2019. This analysis is divided into three phases. The first refers to the years 2015-2017, when the CAS system was mainly regulated by ministerial circulars. The second phase analyses the period following the issuing of the Ministerial Decree of 7 March 2017 which introduced specific and more detailed regulations for these facilities for the first time. The final phase concentrates on the entry into force of Law no. 132/2018, which transformed the SPRAR system into SIPROIMI, and the Ministerial Decree of 20 November 2018 which modified the CAS system again.","PeriodicalId":93477,"journal":{"name":"Mondi migranti : rivista di studi e ricerche sulle migrazioni internazionali","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evolution of the Italian reception system for asylum seekers into a \\\"non-place\\\" for \\\"non-subjects\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Acocella\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/mm2022-001011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article provides a critical analysis of the evolution of the Italian migrant reception system following the 2014 \\\"refugee crisis\\\". The aim is to demonstrate how the touted goal of discouraging so-called \\\"bogus asylum seekers\\\" or \\\"fraudulent economic migrants\\\" has been used to institutionalize the Emergency Reception Centres (CAS) as the ordinary place to host asylum seekers, while the ordinary reception system has been greatly weakened. Furthermore, this process to institutionalize the CASs has been accompanied by the progressive distancing of the regulations for these facilities from the decentralized and dispersed model sought in the ordinary reception system. The reflection is based on a comparative analysis of the tendering procedures to allocate the emergency reception services drawn up by the Prefectures of Florence, Siena and Arezzo between 2015 and 2019. This analysis is divided into three phases. The first refers to the years 2015-2017, when the CAS system was mainly regulated by ministerial circulars. The second phase analyses the period following the issuing of the Ministerial Decree of 7 March 2017 which introduced specific and more detailed regulations for these facilities for the first time. The final phase concentrates on the entry into force of Law no. 132/2018, which transformed the SPRAR system into SIPROIMI, and the Ministerial Decree of 20 November 2018 which modified the CAS system again.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mondi migranti : rivista di studi e ricerche sulle migrazioni internazionali\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mondi migranti : rivista di studi e ricerche sulle migrazioni internazionali\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/mm2022-001011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mondi migranti : rivista di studi e ricerche sulle migrazioni internazionali","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/mm2022-001011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对2014年“难民危机”后意大利移民接收系统的演变进行了批判性分析。其目的是证明,所谓的“虚假寻求庇护者”或“欺诈性经济移民”的目标如何被用来将紧急接待中心(CAS)制度化,使其成为收容寻求庇护者的普通场所,而普通接待系统却被大大削弱。此外,社会福利机构制度化的过程伴随着这些设施的规定与普通接待系统中寻求的分散和分散模式的逐渐距离。这一反思是基于对2015年至2019年佛罗伦萨、锡耶纳和阿雷佐三州制定的紧急接待服务招标程序的比较分析。这个分析分为三个阶段。第一个是2015-2017年,当时CAS系统主要由部委通知监管。第二阶段分析2017年3月7日部长法令发布后的时期,该法令首次为这些设施引入了具体和更详细的规定。最后阶段的重点是第11号法律的生效。第132/2018号法令将SPRAR系统转变为SIPROIMI,以及2018年11月20日的部长法令再次修改了CAS系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evolution of the Italian reception system for asylum seekers into a "non-place" for "non-subjects"
The article provides a critical analysis of the evolution of the Italian migrant reception system following the 2014 "refugee crisis". The aim is to demonstrate how the touted goal of discouraging so-called "bogus asylum seekers" or "fraudulent economic migrants" has been used to institutionalize the Emergency Reception Centres (CAS) as the ordinary place to host asylum seekers, while the ordinary reception system has been greatly weakened. Furthermore, this process to institutionalize the CASs has been accompanied by the progressive distancing of the regulations for these facilities from the decentralized and dispersed model sought in the ordinary reception system. The reflection is based on a comparative analysis of the tendering procedures to allocate the emergency reception services drawn up by the Prefectures of Florence, Siena and Arezzo between 2015 and 2019. This analysis is divided into three phases. The first refers to the years 2015-2017, when the CAS system was mainly regulated by ministerial circulars. The second phase analyses the period following the issuing of the Ministerial Decree of 7 March 2017 which introduced specific and more detailed regulations for these facilities for the first time. The final phase concentrates on the entry into force of Law no. 132/2018, which transformed the SPRAR system into SIPROIMI, and the Ministerial Decree of 20 November 2018 which modified the CAS system again.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Valorizzare il capitale umano per la gestione della diversità culturale Encounters in courtroom. Italian judges as front-line workers in asylum proceedings Da "angeli del mare" a "complici dei trafficanti": la politicizzazione del discorso sovranista contro le ONG umanitarie Managing Cultural Diversity: Challenges and Strategies for the Italian Context Migrazioni, sindacalismo e autorganizzazione nelle campagne: i braccianti migranti in provincia di Foggia (Italia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1