工程项目管理中的危机与风险

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2021-04-26 DOI:10.14488/BJOPM.2021.026
Josivan Leite Alves, E. A. Ferreira, Jeniffer de Nadae
{"title":"工程项目管理中的危机与风险","authors":"Josivan Leite Alves, E. A. Ferreira, Jeniffer de Nadae","doi":"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: This paper performs a literature review to identify and analyze the main gaps related to crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. \nDesign / Methodology / Approach: A literature review research design was carried out merging bibliometrics, network and qualitative and quantitative content analysis. Data were obtained from the scientific database Scopus. \nResults: Publications per year illustrates that in 2016 as concentrated the major number of papers. Only 1% of the authors published 4 papers about models for software engineering risks analysis and reduction. The paper distribution by country shows that the United States has the highest percentage, about 16% of the total. The network of co-occurrence of all keywords has three well-defined clusters. \nLimitations of the investigation: The quantity of papers analyzed and the selection of a single database. \nPractical implications: This research encourages project managers to develop pertinent skills for crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. Furthermore, this study can guide decision-makers on how to manage risks during the crisis, and also highlights the importance of creating a lessons learned database. \nOriginality / Value: The current study can contribute to companies catching lessons learned from literature, helping project managers to motivate the team during the crisis scenarios, to perform an effective struggle during the crisis, and to turn to the former position in a short time after the crisis.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crisis and risks in engineering project management: a review\",\"authors\":\"Josivan Leite Alves, E. A. Ferreira, Jeniffer de Nadae\",\"doi\":\"10.14488/BJOPM.2021.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goal: This paper performs a literature review to identify and analyze the main gaps related to crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. \\nDesign / Methodology / Approach: A literature review research design was carried out merging bibliometrics, network and qualitative and quantitative content analysis. Data were obtained from the scientific database Scopus. \\nResults: Publications per year illustrates that in 2016 as concentrated the major number of papers. Only 1% of the authors published 4 papers about models for software engineering risks analysis and reduction. The paper distribution by country shows that the United States has the highest percentage, about 16% of the total. The network of co-occurrence of all keywords has three well-defined clusters. \\nLimitations of the investigation: The quantity of papers analyzed and the selection of a single database. \\nPractical implications: This research encourages project managers to develop pertinent skills for crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. Furthermore, this study can guide decision-makers on how to manage risks during the crisis, and also highlights the importance of creating a lessons learned database. \\nOriginality / Value: The current study can contribute to companies catching lessons learned from literature, helping project managers to motivate the team during the crisis scenarios, to perform an effective struggle during the crisis, and to turn to the former position in a short time after the crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:本文进行文献综述,以识别和分析工程项目背景下与危机管理和风险管理相关的主要差距。设计/方法/方法:采用文献计量学、网络分析法和定性定量内容分析法相结合的文献综述研究设计。数据来源于科学数据库Scopus。结果:发文量显示,2016年为集中发文量的主要年份。只有1%的作者发表了4篇关于软件工程风险分析和降低模型的论文。按国家划分的论文分布显示,美国的比例最高,约占总数的16%。所有关键词的共现网络有三个定义良好的聚类。调查的局限性:分析论文的数量和单一数据库的选择。实际意义:本研究鼓励项目经理在工程项目背景下发展危机管理和风险管理的相关技能。此外,本研究可以指导决策者在危机期间如何管理风险,并强调建立经验教训数据库的重要性。原创性/价值:当前的研究可以帮助公司从文献中吸取教训,帮助项目经理在危机情景中激励团队,在危机期间进行有效的斗争,并在危机后的短时间内转向前一个位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crisis and risks in engineering project management: a review
Goal: This paper performs a literature review to identify and analyze the main gaps related to crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. Design / Methodology / Approach: A literature review research design was carried out merging bibliometrics, network and qualitative and quantitative content analysis. Data were obtained from the scientific database Scopus. Results: Publications per year illustrates that in 2016 as concentrated the major number of papers. Only 1% of the authors published 4 papers about models for software engineering risks analysis and reduction. The paper distribution by country shows that the United States has the highest percentage, about 16% of the total. The network of co-occurrence of all keywords has three well-defined clusters. Limitations of the investigation: The quantity of papers analyzed and the selection of a single database. Practical implications: This research encourages project managers to develop pertinent skills for crisis management and risk management in the engineering projects context. Furthermore, this study can guide decision-makers on how to manage risks during the crisis, and also highlights the importance of creating a lessons learned database. Originality / Value: The current study can contribute to companies catching lessons learned from literature, helping project managers to motivate the team during the crisis scenarios, to perform an effective struggle during the crisis, and to turn to the former position in a short time after the crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1