Shelley R Edwards, Katherine C Benedict, John Sullivan, Roberto Santos, Ian Hoppe
{"title":"组织扩张器用于儿童头皮重建并发地曲霉真菌感染。","authors":"Shelley R Edwards, Katherine C Benedict, John Sullivan, Roberto Santos, Ian Hoppe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue expansion is an effective option for soft tissue reconstruction of the scalp in the pediatric population. Unfortunately, this approach carries a high risk of such complications as infection and expander exposure. While bacterial infection of alloplastic materials is most frequent, when fungal infections occur, the outcomes can be devastating.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To inform the management of fungal tissue expander infections, this report describes a case of expander-based scalp reconstruction complicated by <i>Aspergillus terreus</i> infection in a pediatric patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient who had blunt-force head trauma presented with soft tissue injury and depressed skull fracture requiring emergent craniectomy. After stabilization, a paucity of soft tissue coverage required further surgical intervention before reconstructive cranioplasty. Six months after her injury, two remote port subgaleal tissue expanders were placed. Subsequently, purulent drainage developed from the surgical incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infection resulted in expander exposure requiring device removal and treatment with clindamycin and ceftazidime while awaiting culture results. Intraoperative cultures were positive for <i>Aspergillus terreus</i> and methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus,</i> for which she received systemic voriconazole for 23 days and cephalexin for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though tissue expansion remains a viable reconstructive option, fungal infection can be disastrous, requiring systemic antifungal therapy, surgical debridement, and expander removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008302/pdf/eplasty-23-e9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue Expander for Pediatric Scalp Reconstruction Complicated by Fungal Infection With Aspergillus terreus.\",\"authors\":\"Shelley R Edwards, Katherine C Benedict, John Sullivan, Roberto Santos, Ian Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue expansion is an effective option for soft tissue reconstruction of the scalp in the pediatric population. Unfortunately, this approach carries a high risk of such complications as infection and expander exposure. While bacterial infection of alloplastic materials is most frequent, when fungal infections occur, the outcomes can be devastating.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To inform the management of fungal tissue expander infections, this report describes a case of expander-based scalp reconstruction complicated by <i>Aspergillus terreus</i> infection in a pediatric patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A patient who had blunt-force head trauma presented with soft tissue injury and depressed skull fracture requiring emergent craniectomy. After stabilization, a paucity of soft tissue coverage required further surgical intervention before reconstructive cranioplasty. Six months after her injury, two remote port subgaleal tissue expanders were placed. Subsequently, purulent drainage developed from the surgical incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infection resulted in expander exposure requiring device removal and treatment with clindamycin and ceftazidime while awaiting culture results. Intraoperative cultures were positive for <i>Aspergillus terreus</i> and methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus,</i> for which she received systemic voriconazole for 23 days and cephalexin for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though tissue expansion remains a viable reconstructive option, fungal infection can be disastrous, requiring systemic antifungal therapy, surgical debridement, and expander removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008302/pdf/eplasty-23-e9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tissue Expander for Pediatric Scalp Reconstruction Complicated by Fungal Infection With Aspergillus terreus.
Background: Tissue expansion is an effective option for soft tissue reconstruction of the scalp in the pediatric population. Unfortunately, this approach carries a high risk of such complications as infection and expander exposure. While bacterial infection of alloplastic materials is most frequent, when fungal infections occur, the outcomes can be devastating.
Purpose: To inform the management of fungal tissue expander infections, this report describes a case of expander-based scalp reconstruction complicated by Aspergillus terreus infection in a pediatric patient.
Methods: A patient who had blunt-force head trauma presented with soft tissue injury and depressed skull fracture requiring emergent craniectomy. After stabilization, a paucity of soft tissue coverage required further surgical intervention before reconstructive cranioplasty. Six months after her injury, two remote port subgaleal tissue expanders were placed. Subsequently, purulent drainage developed from the surgical incision.
Results: Infection resulted in expander exposure requiring device removal and treatment with clindamycin and ceftazidime while awaiting culture results. Intraoperative cultures were positive for Aspergillus terreus and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, for which she received systemic voriconazole for 23 days and cephalexin for 10 days.
Conclusions: Though tissue expansion remains a viable reconstructive option, fungal infection can be disastrous, requiring systemic antifungal therapy, surgical debridement, and expander removal.