{"title":"幸福的目标研究:剖析营销对有色人种青年的影响","authors":"Sonya A. Grier","doi":"10.1177/07439156231183515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketing and public policy discussions about targeted marketing to youth have emphasized how marketing influences youth consumption of potentially hazardous products, including alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy food, and violent entertainment. What is missing, however, is a focused examination of how the effects are different or magnified among Black and Hispanic youth, fast-growing U.S. populations. Consider the April 1999 shooting at Columbine High School, which reawakened concern about youth exposure to violent media. In response, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigated the targeting of restricted movies, music, and video games to American youth. The study concluded that pervasive and aggressive marketingundermined thecredibilityof the ratingsand thushindered parents from making informed decisions about children’s exposure to violent content (Grier 2001). The FTC recommended that all industries enhance their self-regulatory efforts and support consumer education. Because the FTC study focused on “all youth,” there was no effort to understand howaggressivemarketingmight affect youth subgroups. Empirical evidence demonstrated that Black and Hispanic youth spent significantly more time engaging with media compared to White youth—up to eight hours more a day— potentially increasing exposure to marketing and any ill effects. The issue of magnified effects and differential influences reemerged as I began research that investigated the relationship of food and beverage marketing (FBM) to obesity. Black and Hispanic youth have significantly higher rates of obesity than White and Asian youth, and typically protective factors such as income, education, and social mobility are less protective for Black children than for White children (Smith et al. 2019). Obesity disparities correspond to broader racial health disparities reflected by earlier onset, greater severity, and higher mortality rates across multiple disease categories, at an estimated cost to society of $320 billion annually.Health disparities reflect societal injustice and reinforce the need for scholars to value overlookedpopulation segments. Black and Hispanic youth are the target of intense marketing efforts given their psychosocial characteristics, demographic growth, media use patterns, and influence on the broader youth culture (Grier and Kumanyika 2010). Such targeted marketing challenges researchers, policy actors, consumer advocates, and marketing industry players to understand levels of risk regarding the health-related impacts of marketing and to identify appropriate interventions. Policy actors need and want research guidance about target marketing to maneuver sociopolitical dynamics as they develop targeted interventions (Grier and Schaller 2020). The lack of research that centers on the experiences, opportunities, and challenges faced by minoritized youth hampers the development of initiatives to mitigate any negative effects of target marketing and misses opportunities to design positive marketing initiatives.","PeriodicalId":51437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","volume":"1 1","pages":"348 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Research for Well-Being: Dissecting the Effects of Marketing on Youth of Color\",\"authors\":\"Sonya A. Grier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07439156231183515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marketing and public policy discussions about targeted marketing to youth have emphasized how marketing influences youth consumption of potentially hazardous products, including alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy food, and violent entertainment. What is missing, however, is a focused examination of how the effects are different or magnified among Black and Hispanic youth, fast-growing U.S. populations. Consider the April 1999 shooting at Columbine High School, which reawakened concern about youth exposure to violent media. In response, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigated the targeting of restricted movies, music, and video games to American youth. The study concluded that pervasive and aggressive marketingundermined thecredibilityof the ratingsand thushindered parents from making informed decisions about children’s exposure to violent content (Grier 2001). The FTC recommended that all industries enhance their self-regulatory efforts and support consumer education. Because the FTC study focused on “all youth,” there was no effort to understand howaggressivemarketingmight affect youth subgroups. Empirical evidence demonstrated that Black and Hispanic youth spent significantly more time engaging with media compared to White youth—up to eight hours more a day— potentially increasing exposure to marketing and any ill effects. The issue of magnified effects and differential influences reemerged as I began research that investigated the relationship of food and beverage marketing (FBM) to obesity. Black and Hispanic youth have significantly higher rates of obesity than White and Asian youth, and typically protective factors such as income, education, and social mobility are less protective for Black children than for White children (Smith et al. 2019). Obesity disparities correspond to broader racial health disparities reflected by earlier onset, greater severity, and higher mortality rates across multiple disease categories, at an estimated cost to society of $320 billion annually.Health disparities reflect societal injustice and reinforce the need for scholars to value overlookedpopulation segments. Black and Hispanic youth are the target of intense marketing efforts given their psychosocial characteristics, demographic growth, media use patterns, and influence on the broader youth culture (Grier and Kumanyika 2010). Such targeted marketing challenges researchers, policy actors, consumer advocates, and marketing industry players to understand levels of risk regarding the health-related impacts of marketing and to identify appropriate interventions. Policy actors need and want research guidance about target marketing to maneuver sociopolitical dynamics as they develop targeted interventions (Grier and Schaller 2020). The lack of research that centers on the experiences, opportunities, and challenges faced by minoritized youth hampers the development of initiatives to mitigate any negative effects of target marketing and misses opportunities to design positive marketing initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"348 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156231183515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156231183515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
关于针对青少年的市场营销和公共政策的讨论强调了市场营销如何影响青少年对潜在危险产品的消费,包括酒精、烟草、不健康食品和暴力娱乐。然而,缺少的是对黑人和西班牙裔年轻人(快速增长的美国人口)的影响如何不同或放大的集中研究。想想1999年4月哥伦拜恩高中(Columbine High School)的枪击事件,它再次唤起了人们对青少年接触暴力媒体的担忧。作为回应,联邦贸易委员会(FTC)调查了针对美国青少年的限制电影、音乐和视频游戏。研究得出的结论是,无处不在的激进营销破坏了评级的可信度,从而阻碍了父母对孩子接触暴力内容做出明智的决定(Grier 2001)。联邦贸易委员会建议所有行业加强自我监管力度,并支持消费者教育。因为联邦贸易委员会的研究关注的是“所有的年轻人”,所以没有努力去理解激进的市场营销如何影响青少年群体。经验证据表明,与白人青年相比,黑人和西班牙裔青年花在媒体上的时间要多得多——每天多花8个小时——潜在地增加了接触营销和任何不良影响的机会。当我开始研究食品和饮料营销(FBM)与肥胖的关系时,放大效应和差异影响的问题再次出现。黑人和西班牙裔青年的肥胖率明显高于白人和亚洲青年,而收入、教育和社会流动性等典型保护因素对黑人儿童的保护作用低于白人儿童(Smith et al. 2019)。肥胖差异对应着更广泛的种族健康差异,反映在多种疾病类别中发病更早、更严重和死亡率更高,估计每年给社会造成3200亿美元的损失。健康差距反映了社会的不公正,并加强了学者重视被忽视的人口群体的必要性。考虑到黑人和西班牙裔青年的心理社会特征、人口增长、媒体使用模式以及对更广泛的青年文化的影响,他们是市场营销努力的目标(Grier和Kumanyika, 2010)。这种有针对性的营销对研究人员、政策参与者、消费者权益倡导者和营销行业参与者提出了挑战,要求他们了解营销对健康影响的风险水平,并确定适当的干预措施。政策参与者在制定有针对性的干预措施时,需要并希望获得有关目标营销的研究指导,以操纵社会政治动态(Grier和Schaller 2020)。缺乏对少数族裔青年所面临的经历、机会和挑战的研究,阻碍了减轻目标营销负面影响的举措的发展,也错失了设计积极营销举措的机会。
Targeted Research for Well-Being: Dissecting the Effects of Marketing on Youth of Color
Marketing and public policy discussions about targeted marketing to youth have emphasized how marketing influences youth consumption of potentially hazardous products, including alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy food, and violent entertainment. What is missing, however, is a focused examination of how the effects are different or magnified among Black and Hispanic youth, fast-growing U.S. populations. Consider the April 1999 shooting at Columbine High School, which reawakened concern about youth exposure to violent media. In response, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigated the targeting of restricted movies, music, and video games to American youth. The study concluded that pervasive and aggressive marketingundermined thecredibilityof the ratingsand thushindered parents from making informed decisions about children’s exposure to violent content (Grier 2001). The FTC recommended that all industries enhance their self-regulatory efforts and support consumer education. Because the FTC study focused on “all youth,” there was no effort to understand howaggressivemarketingmight affect youth subgroups. Empirical evidence demonstrated that Black and Hispanic youth spent significantly more time engaging with media compared to White youth—up to eight hours more a day— potentially increasing exposure to marketing and any ill effects. The issue of magnified effects and differential influences reemerged as I began research that investigated the relationship of food and beverage marketing (FBM) to obesity. Black and Hispanic youth have significantly higher rates of obesity than White and Asian youth, and typically protective factors such as income, education, and social mobility are less protective for Black children than for White children (Smith et al. 2019). Obesity disparities correspond to broader racial health disparities reflected by earlier onset, greater severity, and higher mortality rates across multiple disease categories, at an estimated cost to society of $320 billion annually.Health disparities reflect societal injustice and reinforce the need for scholars to value overlookedpopulation segments. Black and Hispanic youth are the target of intense marketing efforts given their psychosocial characteristics, demographic growth, media use patterns, and influence on the broader youth culture (Grier and Kumanyika 2010). Such targeted marketing challenges researchers, policy actors, consumer advocates, and marketing industry players to understand levels of risk regarding the health-related impacts of marketing and to identify appropriate interventions. Policy actors need and want research guidance about target marketing to maneuver sociopolitical dynamics as they develop targeted interventions (Grier and Schaller 2020). The lack of research that centers on the experiences, opportunities, and challenges faced by minoritized youth hampers the development of initiatives to mitigate any negative effects of target marketing and misses opportunities to design positive marketing initiatives.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing welcomes manuscripts from diverse disciplines to offer a range of perspectives. We encourage submissions from individuals with varied backgrounds, such as marketing, communications, economics, consumer affairs, law, public policy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, or philosophy. The journal prioritizes well-documented, well-reasoned, balanced, and relevant manuscripts, regardless of the author's field of expertise.