编辑器的介绍。

Ellen L Csikai
{"title":"编辑器的介绍。","authors":"Ellen L Csikai","doi":"10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the new volume for 2023. In this issue, interventions to improve the lives of caregivers as they provide care to individuals near the end of life is the focus. After two reflections, in a practice concepts and innovations entry, Koufacos describes an educational intervention for stress-reduction among caregivers of Veterans with dementia. There were two aspects of the program, individual counseling provided to caregivers and group self-care webinars. The interventionist was a VA palliative care social worker and these techniques showed promising results. Further examination of this model is needed but it is something that other professionals may wish to consider to reduce caregiver stress and increase self-care among dementia caregivers. In the first of the research articles, a problem-solving intervention among family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care was examined with respect to dimensions/styles of problem solving. These dimensions are described well by Bruton et al., which included positive and negative orientations and found these to have a relationship with age. Also, gender was related to differences in use of rational problem-solving style and use of negative orientation and an impulsive problem-making style. Because cancer caregivers often have to deal with many changes in care plans, these factors can and should be assessed when working with cancer caregivers in outpatient palliative care settings to determine the most effective aspects of problem solving. Next, Ullrich et al., switch us to examine inpatient palliative care. A multi-factor screening intervention was conducted among patients admitted in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit in an academic center that included self-reported distress as well as psychosocial stress and others. High levels of distress, depression and anxiety were found and those indicating a subjective need for help were also found to have received assistance, such as increased use of psychological services. Social work services increased among those screened but not at a significant level. A major barrier to completing the screening was cognitive impairment. Different methods of screening for distress and other psychosocial problems may need to be developed specifically for palliative care settings. Finally, Isler and Yildirim share their study pointing to the tremendous need for hospice care in Turkey which is currently absent. Although some palliative care units exist, the needs of the country are not being met. In a qualitative approach, both oncology healthcare professionals and family caregivers of individuals near the end of life (without hospice services) were interviewed. Themes centered around preferences for environment of death, problems caused by in-hospital deaths, need for hospice care, and hospice care for caregivers. These themes were shared by the healthcare professionals and the caregivers. For individuals with cancer and their caregivers,","PeriodicalId":45992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor's Introduction.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen L Csikai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to the new volume for 2023. In this issue, interventions to improve the lives of caregivers as they provide care to individuals near the end of life is the focus. After two reflections, in a practice concepts and innovations entry, Koufacos describes an educational intervention for stress-reduction among caregivers of Veterans with dementia. There were two aspects of the program, individual counseling provided to caregivers and group self-care webinars. The interventionist was a VA palliative care social worker and these techniques showed promising results. Further examination of this model is needed but it is something that other professionals may wish to consider to reduce caregiver stress and increase self-care among dementia caregivers. In the first of the research articles, a problem-solving intervention among family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care was examined with respect to dimensions/styles of problem solving. These dimensions are described well by Bruton et al., which included positive and negative orientations and found these to have a relationship with age. Also, gender was related to differences in use of rational problem-solving style and use of negative orientation and an impulsive problem-making style. Because cancer caregivers often have to deal with many changes in care plans, these factors can and should be assessed when working with cancer caregivers in outpatient palliative care settings to determine the most effective aspects of problem solving. Next, Ullrich et al., switch us to examine inpatient palliative care. A multi-factor screening intervention was conducted among patients admitted in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit in an academic center that included self-reported distress as well as psychosocial stress and others. High levels of distress, depression and anxiety were found and those indicating a subjective need for help were also found to have received assistance, such as increased use of psychological services. Social work services increased among those screened but not at a significant level. A major barrier to completing the screening was cognitive impairment. Different methods of screening for distress and other psychosocial problems may need to be developed specifically for palliative care settings. Finally, Isler and Yildirim share their study pointing to the tremendous need for hospice care in Turkey which is currently absent. Although some palliative care units exist, the needs of the country are not being met. In a qualitative approach, both oncology healthcare professionals and family caregivers of individuals near the end of life (without hospice services) were interviewed. Themes centered around preferences for environment of death, problems caused by in-hospital deaths, need for hospice care, and hospice care for caregivers. These themes were shared by the healthcare professionals and the caregivers. For individuals with cancer and their caregivers,\",\"PeriodicalId\":45992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2023.2184601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor's Introduction.
Welcome to the new volume for 2023. In this issue, interventions to improve the lives of caregivers as they provide care to individuals near the end of life is the focus. After two reflections, in a practice concepts and innovations entry, Koufacos describes an educational intervention for stress-reduction among caregivers of Veterans with dementia. There were two aspects of the program, individual counseling provided to caregivers and group self-care webinars. The interventionist was a VA palliative care social worker and these techniques showed promising results. Further examination of this model is needed but it is something that other professionals may wish to consider to reduce caregiver stress and increase self-care among dementia caregivers. In the first of the research articles, a problem-solving intervention among family caregivers of people with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care was examined with respect to dimensions/styles of problem solving. These dimensions are described well by Bruton et al., which included positive and negative orientations and found these to have a relationship with age. Also, gender was related to differences in use of rational problem-solving style and use of negative orientation and an impulsive problem-making style. Because cancer caregivers often have to deal with many changes in care plans, these factors can and should be assessed when working with cancer caregivers in outpatient palliative care settings to determine the most effective aspects of problem solving. Next, Ullrich et al., switch us to examine inpatient palliative care. A multi-factor screening intervention was conducted among patients admitted in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit in an academic center that included self-reported distress as well as psychosocial stress and others. High levels of distress, depression and anxiety were found and those indicating a subjective need for help were also found to have received assistance, such as increased use of psychological services. Social work services increased among those screened but not at a significant level. A major barrier to completing the screening was cognitive impairment. Different methods of screening for distress and other psychosocial problems may need to be developed specifically for palliative care settings. Finally, Isler and Yildirim share their study pointing to the tremendous need for hospice care in Turkey which is currently absent. Although some palliative care units exist, the needs of the country are not being met. In a qualitative approach, both oncology healthcare professionals and family caregivers of individuals near the end of life (without hospice services) were interviewed. Themes centered around preferences for environment of death, problems caused by in-hospital deaths, need for hospice care, and hospice care for caregivers. These themes were shared by the healthcare professionals and the caregivers. For individuals with cancer and their caregivers,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, now affiliated with the Social Work in Hospice and Palliative Care Network, explores issues crucial to caring for terminally ill patients and their families. Academics and social work practitioners present current research, articles, and continuing features on the "state of the art" of social work practice, including interdisciplinary interventions, practice innovations, practice evaluations, end-of-life decision-making, grief and bereavement, and ethical and moral issues. The Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care combines theory and practice to facilitate an understanding of the multi-level issues surrounding care for those in pain and suffering from painful, debilitating, and/or terminal illness.
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study of Clinical Stillbirth Management for Grieving Mothers. How Tangible is an Advance Care Planning Document in Reality? Still Ship at Sea. Disbelief, Distress, & Distrust: Trending Institution Related Emotional Distress During COVID-19. Always Politically Correct: Supporting Seriously Ill Older Populations and Their Families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1