加强接种ChAdOx1 nCoV-19疫苗后抗体持续时间长达6个月的比较

IF 2.1 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiology Research Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.20944/preprints202304.0364.v1
Pawita Suwanwattana, M. Han, T. Nopsopon, P. Phutrakool, C. Samuthpongtorn, W. Pongpirul, W. Prasithsirikul, K. Pongpirul
{"title":"加强接种ChAdOx1 nCoV-19疫苗后抗体持续时间长达6个月的比较","authors":"Pawita Suwanwattana, M. Han, T. Nopsopon, P. Phutrakool, C. Samuthpongtorn, W. Pongpirul, W. Prasithsirikul, K. Pongpirul","doi":"10.20944/preprints202304.0364.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccines are crucial for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, and booster doses are becoming increasingly important. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca as a third dose in healthcare workers at different time intervals (one, three, and six months). Two methods to measure immune response—ELISA (EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Luebeck, Germany) and ELISpot (Mabtech AB, Macka Strand, Sweden)—were used. A total of 170 participants were included in the study. The results showed that while IgG levels decreased at six months compared to levels at one and three months, they were still significantly higher than the baseline. Furthermore, neutralizing levels at three and six months and after the third dose were not significantly different. These findings suggest that the immune response induced by the vaccine was robust and effective for several months. These results have significant implications for public health policymakers, as they provide strong support for booster vaccinations. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine appears to be a reliable option for preventing the spread of COVID-19, and this study provides valuable information for healthcare workers and policymakers in managing the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43788,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Antibody Persistence up to 6 Months after Additional Booster Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine\",\"authors\":\"Pawita Suwanwattana, M. Han, T. Nopsopon, P. Phutrakool, C. Samuthpongtorn, W. Pongpirul, W. Prasithsirikul, K. Pongpirul\",\"doi\":\"10.20944/preprints202304.0364.v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vaccines are crucial for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, and booster doses are becoming increasingly important. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca as a third dose in healthcare workers at different time intervals (one, three, and six months). Two methods to measure immune response—ELISA (EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Luebeck, Germany) and ELISpot (Mabtech AB, Macka Strand, Sweden)—were used. A total of 170 participants were included in the study. The results showed that while IgG levels decreased at six months compared to levels at one and three months, they were still significantly higher than the baseline. Furthermore, neutralizing levels at three and six months and after the third dose were not significantly different. These findings suggest that the immune response induced by the vaccine was robust and effective for several months. These results have significant implications for public health policymakers, as they provide strong support for booster vaccinations. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine appears to be a reliable option for preventing the spread of COVID-19, and this study provides valuable information for healthcare workers and policymakers in managing the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology Research\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0364.v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0364.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗对于控制COVID-19大流行至关重要,加强剂量正变得越来越重要。本研究旨在评估阿斯利康公司的ChAdOx1 nCoV-19疫苗在不同时间间隔(1个月、3个月和6个月)作为医护人员第三剂的疗效。检测免疫反应的两种方法分别是elisa(德国Luebeck的EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG)和ELISpot(瑞典Mabtech AB, Macka Strand)。共有170名参与者参与了这项研究。结果显示,虽然与1个月和3个月的水平相比,6个月时IgG水平有所下降,但仍明显高于基线水平。此外,在第3、6个月和第三次剂量后的中和水平没有显著差异。这些结果表明,疫苗诱导的免疫反应在几个月内是稳健有效的。这些结果对公共卫生政策制定者具有重要意义,因为它们为加强疫苗接种提供了强有力的支持。ChAdOx1 nCoV-19疫苗似乎是预防COVID-19传播的可靠选择,本研究为卫生保健工作者和政策制定者管理大流行提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Antibody Persistence up to 6 Months after Additional Booster Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine
Vaccines are crucial for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, and booster doses are becoming increasingly important. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca as a third dose in healthcare workers at different time intervals (one, three, and six months). Two methods to measure immune response—ELISA (EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Luebeck, Germany) and ELISpot (Mabtech AB, Macka Strand, Sweden)—were used. A total of 170 participants were included in the study. The results showed that while IgG levels decreased at six months compared to levels at one and three months, they were still significantly higher than the baseline. Furthermore, neutralizing levels at three and six months and after the third dose were not significantly different. These findings suggest that the immune response induced by the vaccine was robust and effective for several months. These results have significant implications for public health policymakers, as they provide strong support for booster vaccinations. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine appears to be a reliable option for preventing the spread of COVID-19, and this study provides valuable information for healthcare workers and policymakers in managing the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology Research
Microbiology Research MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiology Research is an international, online-only, open access peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research, review articles, editorials, perspectives, case reports and brief reports to benefit researchers, microbiologists, physicians, veterinarians. Microbiology Research publishes ‘Clinic’ and ‘Research’ papers divided into two different skill and proficiency levels: ‘Junior’ and ‘Professional’. The aim of this four quadrant grid is to encourage younger researchers, physicians and veterinarians to submit their results even if their studies encompass just a limited set of observations or rely on basic statistical approach, yet upholding the customary sound approach of every scientific article.
期刊最新文献
Updates on Staphylococcal Vaccines Assess the Diagnostic Accuracy of GeneXpert to Detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis among Presumptive Tuberculosis and Presumptive Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients Genome Sequence and Characterisation of Peribacillus sp. Strain AS_2, a Bacterial Endophyte Isolated from Alectra sessiliflora Biodegradation of Free Cyanide by a New Isolated Alkaliphilic Bacillus licheniformis Strain Bioactive Diepoxy Metabolites and Highly Oxygenated Triterpenoids from Marine and Plant-Derived Bacteria and Fungi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1