老年人群癫痫持续状态患者的临床特征及住院死亡率预测因素

Archana Verma, Alok Kumar, Pooja Pathak, Ashutosh Kumar Mishra
{"title":"老年人群癫痫持续状态患者的临床特征及住院死亡率预测因素","authors":"Archana Verma,&nbsp;Alok Kumar,&nbsp;Pooja Pathak,&nbsp;Ashutosh Kumar Mishra","doi":"10.14581/jer.22009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><i>De novo</i> status epilepticus (SE) had worse outcome in comparison to the patients with SE who had previous history of epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to identify clinical features of <i>de novo</i> convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and the predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-seven elderly (≥60 years of age) hospitalized patients with <i>de novo</i> CSE were evaluated for clinical profile, aetiologies and predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the participants in the study was 65.96±6.72 years. In <i>de novo</i> CSE, the most common aetiologies were acute symptomatic in 68.8% of cases, followed by remote symptomatic in 24.7%. In-hospital mortality in the <i>de novo</i> CSE in the elderly was 30 (38.9%) in our series. Stroke was the leading cause of death among them (acute stroke in 23 cases and old infarct in 1 case), followed by post-traumatic (n=4) and CNS infection (n=2). On multivariate analysis, it was found that variables significantly related to mortality in <i>de novo</i> CSE were low Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 53.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.17-555.14; <i>p</i>=0.001) and lack of response to first line treatment (AOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50; <i>p</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital mortality in <i>de novo</i> CSE patients was linked to a low GCS and a lack of response to first-line therapy. The most efficient strategy to prevent in-hospital mortality in the elderly is to treat <i>de novo</i> CSE promptly and aggressively in the setting of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/03/jer-22009.PMC9830029.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Profile and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in <i>De Novo</i> Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the Elderly Populace.\",\"authors\":\"Archana Verma,&nbsp;Alok Kumar,&nbsp;Pooja Pathak,&nbsp;Ashutosh Kumar Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.22009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><i>De novo</i> status epilepticus (SE) had worse outcome in comparison to the patients with SE who had previous history of epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to identify clinical features of <i>de novo</i> convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and the predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-seven elderly (≥60 years of age) hospitalized patients with <i>de novo</i> CSE were evaluated for clinical profile, aetiologies and predictors of in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the participants in the study was 65.96±6.72 years. In <i>de novo</i> CSE, the most common aetiologies were acute symptomatic in 68.8% of cases, followed by remote symptomatic in 24.7%. In-hospital mortality in the <i>de novo</i> CSE in the elderly was 30 (38.9%) in our series. Stroke was the leading cause of death among them (acute stroke in 23 cases and old infarct in 1 case), followed by post-traumatic (n=4) and CNS infection (n=2). On multivariate analysis, it was found that variables significantly related to mortality in <i>de novo</i> CSE were low Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 53.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.17-555.14; <i>p</i>=0.001) and lack of response to first line treatment (AOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50; <i>p</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital mortality in <i>de novo</i> CSE patients was linked to a low GCS and a lack of response to first-line therapy. The most efficient strategy to prevent in-hospital mortality in the elderly is to treat <i>de novo</i> CSE promptly and aggressively in the setting of stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/03/jer-22009.PMC9830029.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.22009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:与既往有癫痫史的癫痫持续状态(SE)患者相比,重新发作的癫痫持续状态(SE)预后更差。本研究的目的是确定新生惊厥癫痫持续状态(CSE)的临床特征和住院死亡率的预测因素。方法:对77例老年(≥60岁)新生CSE住院患者的临床特征、病因和院内死亡率预测因素进行评估。结果:研究对象平均年龄为65.96±6.72岁。在新生CSE病例中,最常见的病因是急性症状(68.8%),其次是远程症状(24.7%)。在我们的研究中,老年新生CSE患者的住院死亡率为30(38.9%)。脑卒中是其中的主要死亡原因(急性脑卒中23例,老年性脑梗死1例),其次是创伤后(n=4)和中枢神经系统感染(n=2)。在多因素分析中,发现与新生CSE死亡率显著相关的变量是低格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)(校正优势比[AOR], 53.5;95%置信区间[CI], 5.17-555.14;p=0.001)和对一线治疗缺乏反应(AOR, 0.06;95% ci, 0.01-0.50;p = 0.01)。结论:新生CSE患者的住院死亡率与低GCS和对一线治疗缺乏反应有关。预防老年人住院死亡率的最有效策略是在中风的情况下及时和积极地治疗新生CSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Profile and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in De Novo Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the Elderly Populace.

Background and purpose: De novo status epilepticus (SE) had worse outcome in comparison to the patients with SE who had previous history of epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to identify clinical features of de novo convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and the predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Methods: Seventy-seven elderly (≥60 years of age) hospitalized patients with de novo CSE were evaluated for clinical profile, aetiologies and predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Results: The average age of the participants in the study was 65.96±6.72 years. In de novo CSE, the most common aetiologies were acute symptomatic in 68.8% of cases, followed by remote symptomatic in 24.7%. In-hospital mortality in the de novo CSE in the elderly was 30 (38.9%) in our series. Stroke was the leading cause of death among them (acute stroke in 23 cases and old infarct in 1 case), followed by post-traumatic (n=4) and CNS infection (n=2). On multivariate analysis, it was found that variables significantly related to mortality in de novo CSE were low Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 53.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.17-555.14; p=0.001) and lack of response to first line treatment (AOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.50; p=0.01).

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality in de novo CSE patients was linked to a low GCS and a lack of response to first-line therapy. The most efficient strategy to prevent in-hospital mortality in the elderly is to treat de novo CSE promptly and aggressively in the setting of stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additive Anticonvulsive Effects of Sumatriptan and Morphine on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Clonic Seizures in Mice. Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency in 2 Cases with Intractable Myoclonic Epilepsy. Gyratory Seizures in Hypothalamic Hamartoma. Laughter-Induced Seizures: A Rare Type of Reflex Epilepsy. Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1