锥形束ct评价Protaper Gold、Neoendo和不锈钢(SS)手K锉对下颌磨牙近中根远端残余牙本质厚度的影响。

A. Prasad, Asha Jetwani, Deepak Raisingani, Harshit Srivastava, Prachi Mital, Aarushi Chopra
{"title":"锥形束ct评价Protaper Gold、Neoendo和不锈钢(SS)手K锉对下颌磨牙近中根远端残余牙本质厚度的影响。","authors":"A. Prasad, Asha Jetwani, Deepak Raisingani, Harshit Srivastava, Prachi Mital, Aarushi Chopra","doi":"10.21276//ujds.2022.8.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the remaining dentin thickness of the distal portion of the mesial root of mandibular molar with stainless steel (SS) hand K files, ProTaper Gold and NeoEndo using cone beam computed tomography for analysis. \nMaterials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human mandibular molars were collected. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n=15). Samples were stabilized on blocks of wax. The working length for each sample was determined at 1 mm short from the apical foramen by using a ISO size #15 K file. Preparation was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions and canals were instrumented upto apically for each group. After each instrumentation, root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 17% EDTA solution. Final irrigation was done with normal saline. Post cleaning and shaping, cone beam computed tomography scans of all samples in the three groups were collected. \nResult: Protaper Gold and NeoEndo removed more dentin than SS hand file. As the mean remaining dentin thickness for SS K file, Neoendo and Protaper was 1.30, 1.05 and 0.80mm respectively \n  \nConclusion: Protaper Gold, NeoEndo and SS Hand files showed statistically significant difference in remaining dentin thickness of root canal length. Therefore, it was concluded that Protaper Gold file system showed a greater amount of removal of dentin as compared to NeoEndo file system & SS Hand K files.","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Remaining Dentin Thickness of the Distal Portion of the Mesial Root of Mandibular Molar with Protaper Gold, Neoendo and Stainless Steel (SS) Hand K Files Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"A. Prasad, Asha Jetwani, Deepak Raisingani, Harshit Srivastava, Prachi Mital, Aarushi Chopra\",\"doi\":\"10.21276//ujds.2022.8.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate the remaining dentin thickness of the distal portion of the mesial root of mandibular molar with stainless steel (SS) hand K files, ProTaper Gold and NeoEndo using cone beam computed tomography for analysis. \\nMaterials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human mandibular molars were collected. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n=15). Samples were stabilized on blocks of wax. The working length for each sample was determined at 1 mm short from the apical foramen by using a ISO size #15 K file. Preparation was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions and canals were instrumented upto apically for each group. After each instrumentation, root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 17% EDTA solution. Final irrigation was done with normal saline. Post cleaning and shaping, cone beam computed tomography scans of all samples in the three groups were collected. \\nResult: Protaper Gold and NeoEndo removed more dentin than SS hand file. As the mean remaining dentin thickness for SS K file, Neoendo and Protaper was 1.30, 1.05 and 0.80mm respectively \\n  \\nConclusion: Protaper Gold, NeoEndo and SS Hand files showed statistically significant difference in remaining dentin thickness of root canal length. Therefore, it was concluded that Protaper Gold file system showed a greater amount of removal of dentin as compared to NeoEndo file system & SS Hand K files.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2022.8.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2022.8.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用不锈钢(SS)手K锉、ProTaper Gold和NeoEndo进行锥形束ct分析,评价下颌磨牙近中根远端剩余牙本质厚度。材料与方法:收集45颗拔除的人下颌磨牙。牙齿随机分为3组(n=15)。样品在蜡块上稳定。每个样品的工作长度使用ISO尺寸#15 K文件在距根尖孔1毫米处测定。根据制造商的说明进行准备,并对每组的根管进行器械至根尖。每次预备后,用5.25%次氯酸钠溶液和17% EDTA溶液冲洗根管。最后用生理盐水冲洗。清洗和整形后,收集三组所有样本的锥形束计算机断层扫描结果。结果:Protaper Gold和NeoEndo比SS手锉去除牙本质更多。SS K锉、Neoendo锉和Protaper锉的平均剩余牙本质厚度分别为1.30、1.05和0.80mm。结论:Protaper Gold锉、Neoendo锉和SS Hand锉的根管长度剩余牙本质厚度差异有统计学意义。因此,我们得出结论,Protaper Gold文件系统比NeoEndo文件系统和SS Hand K文件系统更能去除牙本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Remaining Dentin Thickness of the Distal Portion of the Mesial Root of Mandibular Molar with Protaper Gold, Neoendo and Stainless Steel (SS) Hand K Files Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Analysis.
Aim: To evaluate the remaining dentin thickness of the distal portion of the mesial root of mandibular molar with stainless steel (SS) hand K files, ProTaper Gold and NeoEndo using cone beam computed tomography for analysis. Materials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human mandibular molars were collected. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n=15). Samples were stabilized on blocks of wax. The working length for each sample was determined at 1 mm short from the apical foramen by using a ISO size #15 K file. Preparation was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions and canals were instrumented upto apically for each group. After each instrumentation, root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 17% EDTA solution. Final irrigation was done with normal saline. Post cleaning and shaping, cone beam computed tomography scans of all samples in the three groups were collected. Result: Protaper Gold and NeoEndo removed more dentin than SS hand file. As the mean remaining dentin thickness for SS K file, Neoendo and Protaper was 1.30, 1.05 and 0.80mm respectively   Conclusion: Protaper Gold, NeoEndo and SS Hand files showed statistically significant difference in remaining dentin thickness of root canal length. Therefore, it was concluded that Protaper Gold file system showed a greater amount of removal of dentin as compared to NeoEndo file system & SS Hand K files.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Review of Surface Coatings for enhancement of Anti-Microbial and Anti-Corrosive Properties of Titanium Implant Surface Unusually Large Radicular Cyst of Mandible: A Rare Case Report Revisiting “Plaque Free Zone”- Island of Peace in a Zone of Conflict: A stereomicroscopic study Misdiagnosed Case Management of Dens Invaginatus Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- A Case Report Comparison of the Effect of Various Surface Treatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic with Dentin- An In-vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1