[病人从麻醉转到麻醉后病房:瑞士三家医院现状分析]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Pflege Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000876
Luzia Vetter, Elena Camenzind
{"title":"[病人从麻醉转到麻醉后病房:瑞士三家医院现状分析]。","authors":"Luzia Vetter,&nbsp;Elena Camenzind","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Patient handovers carry a risk of inadequate or missing communication of important information that can jeopardize patient safety. To increase patient safety, protocols for processes and contents of a structured patient handover were created. <i>Aim:</i> To assess the current status of patient handovers from anaesthesia staff to recovery room nurses. <i>Method:</i> After a literature search an observation protocol for patient handovers according to the SBAR concept (von Dossow & Zwißler, 2016) was developed. Using this checklist, non-participant observations were conducted in three Swiss hospitals and evaluated with statistical analysis. <i>Results:</i> A total of 98 observations were made. The report receiving person felt integrated into the handover and received the necessary information. Deficiencies in patient identification and a joint control of lines after surgical interventions could be identified. The subjectively rated quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals (X<sup>2</sup>(2)=,927, <i>p</i>=,629) and also not according to the time of day (X<sup>2</sup>(2)=3,604, <i>p</i>=,216). There was also no difference between the subjective quality of the handover and the delivering professional group (X<sup>2</sup>(3)=4,507, <i>p</i>=,212). <i>Conclusions:</i> The subjective quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals. However, the patient handover protocols need to be adapted to ensure that patient identification and a joint assessment including control of lines and drains are performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals].\",\"authors\":\"Luzia Vetter,&nbsp;Elena Camenzind\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1012-5302/a000876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Patient handovers carry a risk of inadequate or missing communication of important information that can jeopardize patient safety. To increase patient safety, protocols for processes and contents of a structured patient handover were created. <i>Aim:</i> To assess the current status of patient handovers from anaesthesia staff to recovery room nurses. <i>Method:</i> After a literature search an observation protocol for patient handovers according to the SBAR concept (von Dossow & Zwißler, 2016) was developed. Using this checklist, non-participant observations were conducted in three Swiss hospitals and evaluated with statistical analysis. <i>Results:</i> A total of 98 observations were made. The report receiving person felt integrated into the handover and received the necessary information. Deficiencies in patient identification and a joint control of lines after surgical interventions could be identified. The subjectively rated quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals (X<sup>2</sup>(2)=,927, <i>p</i>=,629) and also not according to the time of day (X<sup>2</sup>(2)=3,604, <i>p</i>=,216). There was also no difference between the subjective quality of the handover and the delivering professional group (X<sup>2</sup>(3)=4,507, <i>p</i>=,212). <i>Conclusions:</i> The subjective quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals. However, the patient handover protocols need to be adapted to ensure that patient identification and a joint assessment including control of lines and drains are performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pflege\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pflege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:患者交接存在重要信息沟通不充分或缺失的风险,可能危及患者安全。为了提高患者安全,创建了结构化患者移交的流程和内容的协议。目的:了解麻醉人员向康复室护士移交病人的现状。方法:通过文献检索,根据SBAR概念制定患者移交观察方案(von Dossow & Zwißler, 2016)。使用该检查表,在三家瑞士医院进行了非参与性观察,并进行了统计分析。结果:共观察98次。接收报告的人感觉自己融入了交接,收到了必要的信息。可以确定手术干预后患者识别和联合控制线的缺陷。三家医院主观评定的病人交接质量无差异(X2(2)=,927, p=,629),也不受时间的影响(X2(2)=3,604, p=,216)。交接的主观素质与交付专业组之间也无差异(X2(3)=4,507, p=,212)。结论:三家医院患者交接的主观素质无显著差异。然而,需要调整患者交接协议,以确保进行患者识别和联合评估,包括对管道和管道的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals].

Patient handover from anaesthesia to postanaesthesia unit: An analysis of the current situation in three Swiss hospitals Abstract: Background: Patient handovers carry a risk of inadequate or missing communication of important information that can jeopardize patient safety. To increase patient safety, protocols for processes and contents of a structured patient handover were created. Aim: To assess the current status of patient handovers from anaesthesia staff to recovery room nurses. Method: After a literature search an observation protocol for patient handovers according to the SBAR concept (von Dossow & Zwißler, 2016) was developed. Using this checklist, non-participant observations were conducted in three Swiss hospitals and evaluated with statistical analysis. Results: A total of 98 observations were made. The report receiving person felt integrated into the handover and received the necessary information. Deficiencies in patient identification and a joint control of lines after surgical interventions could be identified. The subjectively rated quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals (X2(2)=,927, p=,629) and also not according to the time of day (X2(2)=3,604, p=,216). There was also no difference between the subjective quality of the handover and the delivering professional group (X2(3)=4,507, p=,212). Conclusions: The subjective quality of patient handover did not differ between the three hospitals. However, the patient handover protocols need to be adapted to ensure that patient identification and a joint assessment including control of lines and drains are performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
期刊最新文献
[Development and piloting of nurse-led mHealth care for heart failure patients: A feasibility study]. [On the effectiveness of a new advisory service for parents of children in need of care: a controlled study]. Ongoing and emerging issues for residential long-term care in the context of Covid-19. Primary nursing in the intensive care unit. [The physical and mental health of home care recipients: A quantitative secondary data analysis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1