Savanah D Gisriel, Kristle L. Haberichter, Sara Huang, James Z. Huang
{"title":"淋巴细胞结节型霍奇金淋巴瘤复发性或持续性淋巴结病变的流式细胞术分析","authors":"Savanah D Gisriel, Kristle L. Haberichter, Sara Huang, James Z. Huang","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We recently examined the utility of flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis of nodular \nlymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) by examining reactive T-cell features. This study \naims to compare these features in sequential biopsies of persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy in patients \nwith NLPHL.\nMethods: We reanalysed the histopathology and flow cytometry findings of 9 patients with multiple \nbiopsies for persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy and either initial or recurrent NLPHL. A flow \ncytometry signature was considered suggestive of NLPHL if ≥12% of T-cells expressed CD57 or ≥3% of \nT-cells co-expressed CD4 and CD8.\nResults: A flow cytometry signature considered suggestive of NLPHL was seen in 18 of 20 specimens. \nBased on histopathology, 11 were diagnosed as NLPHL, 3 were initially underdiagnosed as atypical \nlymphoid proliferation, and 4 were initially incorrectly diagnosed as negative or progressive transformation \nof germinal centers. Flow cytometry showed similar expression patterns of CD57 and CD4/CD8 in T-cells \nbetween initial and subsequent biopsies. The remaining 2 specimens lacked the flow cytometry signature \nsuggestive of NLPHL and were histopathologically diagnosed as reactive hyperplasia.\nConclusion: Flow cytometry analysis based on our criteria is highly sensitive in detecting NLPHL. \nCorrelation with the cytospin cytology may increase the diagnostic specificity. A negative flow essentially \nruled out the possibility of NHLPHL.\n","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow Cytometry Analysis of Recurrent or Persistent Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma\",\"authors\":\"Savanah D Gisriel, Kristle L. Haberichter, Sara Huang, James Z. Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: We recently examined the utility of flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis of nodular \\nlymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) by examining reactive T-cell features. This study \\naims to compare these features in sequential biopsies of persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy in patients \\nwith NLPHL.\\nMethods: We reanalysed the histopathology and flow cytometry findings of 9 patients with multiple \\nbiopsies for persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy and either initial or recurrent NLPHL. A flow \\ncytometry signature was considered suggestive of NLPHL if ≥12% of T-cells expressed CD57 or ≥3% of \\nT-cells co-expressed CD4 and CD8.\\nResults: A flow cytometry signature considered suggestive of NLPHL was seen in 18 of 20 specimens. \\nBased on histopathology, 11 were diagnosed as NLPHL, 3 were initially underdiagnosed as atypical \\nlymphoid proliferation, and 4 were initially incorrectly diagnosed as negative or progressive transformation \\nof germinal centers. Flow cytometry showed similar expression patterns of CD57 and CD4/CD8 in T-cells \\nbetween initial and subsequent biopsies. The remaining 2 specimens lacked the flow cytometry signature \\nsuggestive of NLPHL and were histopathologically diagnosed as reactive hyperplasia.\\nConclusion: Flow cytometry analysis based on our criteria is highly sensitive in detecting NLPHL. \\nCorrelation with the cytospin cytology may increase the diagnostic specificity. A negative flow essentially \\nruled out the possibility of NHLPHL.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oncology and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Recurrent or Persistent Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma
Objectives: We recently examined the utility of flow cytometric analysis in the diagnosis of nodular
lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) by examining reactive T-cell features. This study
aims to compare these features in sequential biopsies of persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy in patients
with NLPHL.
Methods: We reanalysed the histopathology and flow cytometry findings of 9 patients with multiple
biopsies for persistent or recurrent lymphadenopathy and either initial or recurrent NLPHL. A flow
cytometry signature was considered suggestive of NLPHL if ≥12% of T-cells expressed CD57 or ≥3% of
T-cells co-expressed CD4 and CD8.
Results: A flow cytometry signature considered suggestive of NLPHL was seen in 18 of 20 specimens.
Based on histopathology, 11 were diagnosed as NLPHL, 3 were initially underdiagnosed as atypical
lymphoid proliferation, and 4 were initially incorrectly diagnosed as negative or progressive transformation
of germinal centers. Flow cytometry showed similar expression patterns of CD57 and CD4/CD8 in T-cells
between initial and subsequent biopsies. The remaining 2 specimens lacked the flow cytometry signature
suggestive of NLPHL and were histopathologically diagnosed as reactive hyperplasia.
Conclusion: Flow cytometry analysis based on our criteria is highly sensitive in detecting NLPHL.
Correlation with the cytospin cytology may increase the diagnostic specificity. A negative flow essentially
ruled out the possibility of NHLPHL.