贸易模式是否提高了制度质量?地区间比较

K. Chung, M. Choi
{"title":"贸易模式是否提高了制度质量?地区间比较","authors":"K. Chung, M. Choi","doi":"10.1080/13876988.2021.1939013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We empirically investigate how trade pattern – institutionally intensive export (IIX) – affects institutional quality, a source of comparative advantage for IIX. Using panel data for147 countries from 2002 to 2016, we examine the effect of IIX on institutional quality across regions. Our estimation results of fixed effects and dynamic panel models show significant regional heterogeneity. Most noticeably, the effect is negative and significant only for East Asia robustly in all dynamic models. Our result suggests that IIX may not unambiguously improve institutional quality across the board, and the effect needs to be considered differently across regions.","PeriodicalId":15486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice","volume":"8 5","pages":"557 - 582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Trade Pattern Enhance Institutional Quality? Comparison across Regions\",\"authors\":\"K. Chung, M. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13876988.2021.1939013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We empirically investigate how trade pattern – institutionally intensive export (IIX) – affects institutional quality, a source of comparative advantage for IIX. Using panel data for147 countries from 2002 to 2016, we examine the effect of IIX on institutional quality across regions. Our estimation results of fixed effects and dynamic panel models show significant regional heterogeneity. Most noticeably, the effect is negative and significant only for East Asia robustly in all dynamic models. Our result suggests that IIX may not unambiguously improve institutional quality across the board, and the effect needs to be considered differently across regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"557 - 582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1939013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1939013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文实证研究了贸易模式——制度密集型出口(IIX)对制度质量(IIX的比较优势来源)的影响。利用2002年至2016年147个国家的面板数据,我们检验了IIX对各地区制度质量的影响。固定效应和动态面板模型的估计结果显示出显著的区域异质性。最值得注意的是,在所有动态模型中,只有东亚地区的影响是负的,并且显著。我们的研究结果表明,IIX可能不会毫无疑问地全面提高制度质量,并且需要在不同地区进行不同的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Trade Pattern Enhance Institutional Quality? Comparison across Regions
Abstract We empirically investigate how trade pattern – institutionally intensive export (IIX) – affects institutional quality, a source of comparative advantage for IIX. Using panel data for147 countries from 2002 to 2016, we examine the effect of IIX on institutional quality across regions. Our estimation results of fixed effects and dynamic panel models show significant regional heterogeneity. Most noticeably, the effect is negative and significant only for East Asia robustly in all dynamic models. Our result suggests that IIX may not unambiguously improve institutional quality across the board, and the effect needs to be considered differently across regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lending Overlap in Europe’s Financial Architecture: A Comparative Analysis Comparing Policy Feedback Effects in Federal Systems: The Case of Provincial Indigenous Consultation Policies in Canada Tackling the Digital Divide? A Comparative Policy Analysis of International Organizations’ Varying Approaches to the Digitalization of Education Qualitative Comparative Policy Studies: An Introduction from the Special Section Editors An Indicator-Based Approach to Comparative Policy Analysis: Measuring Regional Governance of Migrant Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1