谷歌与CCI在线平台的演变市场定义分析

Aakash Kumbhat
{"title":"谷歌与CCI在线平台的演变市场定义分析","authors":"Aakash Kumbhat","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2020.1819050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The popularity of multi-sided online platforms has risen exponentially in the last decade, and so have the number of competition cases involving such platforms. This paper examines how the Competition Commission of India (CCI) defines the relevant market in its landmark Google decision. It then traces how CCI’s analysis of market definitions has evolved over the time by comparing the Google decision with other cases concerning online platforms that have been decided before and after it. To trace this evolution, it also explores the relevant reports, studies, and proposed amendments to the existing legal framework in India and assesses how these may impact the future analysis of market definitions.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Google and the evolution of CCI’s online platform market definition analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aakash Kumbhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2020.1819050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The popularity of multi-sided online platforms has risen exponentially in the last decade, and so have the number of competition cases involving such platforms. This paper examines how the Competition Commission of India (CCI) defines the relevant market in its landmark Google decision. It then traces how CCI’s analysis of market definitions has evolved over the time by comparing the Google decision with other cases concerning online platforms that have been decided before and after it. To trace this evolution, it also explores the relevant reports, studies, and proposed amendments to the existing legal framework in India and assesses how these may impact the future analysis of market definitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1819050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2020.1819050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近十年来,多边网络平台的普及程度呈指数级增长,涉及此类平台的竞争案件数量也呈指数级增长。本文考察了印度竞争委员会(CCI)如何在其具有里程碑意义的b谷歌决定中定义相关市场。然后,通过将b谷歌案的判决与此前和之后做出的其他涉及在线平台的判决进行比较,追溯CCI对市场定义的分析是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。为了追踪这一演变,它还探讨了印度现有法律框架的相关报告、研究和拟议修正案,并评估了这些可能如何影响未来对市场定义的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Google and the evolution of CCI’s online platform market definition analysis
ABSTRACT The popularity of multi-sided online platforms has risen exponentially in the last decade, and so have the number of competition cases involving such platforms. This paper examines how the Competition Commission of India (CCI) defines the relevant market in its landmark Google decision. It then traces how CCI’s analysis of market definitions has evolved over the time by comparing the Google decision with other cases concerning online platforms that have been decided before and after it. To trace this evolution, it also explores the relevant reports, studies, and proposed amendments to the existing legal framework in India and assesses how these may impact the future analysis of market definitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1