基于衍射和基于图像的先进技术节点叠加评价

Jian Xu, Long Qin, Qiaoli Chen, Hui Zhi, Yanyun Wang, Zhengkai Yang, Zhibiao Mao
{"title":"基于衍射和基于图像的先进技术节点叠加评价","authors":"Jian Xu, Long Qin, Qiaoli Chen, Hui Zhi, Yanyun Wang, Zhengkai Yang, Zhibiao Mao","doi":"10.1109/CSTIC.2017.7919769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overlay control is one of the main challenges for advanced lithography in sub-28 nm technology node. There are two kind of overlay metrology in use in semiconductor industry: most conventional image-based overlay (IBO) metrology and advanced diffraction-based overlay(DBO) metrology. In this paper we will compare these two methods through 3 critical production layers, focusing on the accuracy and the total measurement uncertainty (TMU) for the standard overlay targets of both techniques. The results show that both the accuracy and TMU of DBO method are superior to the traditional IBO method, which makes DBO method applicable at the 28nm and below technology node.","PeriodicalId":6846,"journal":{"name":"2017 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)","volume":"55 ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffraction-based and image-based overlay evaluation for advanced technology node\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xu, Long Qin, Qiaoli Chen, Hui Zhi, Yanyun Wang, Zhengkai Yang, Zhibiao Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSTIC.2017.7919769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The overlay control is one of the main challenges for advanced lithography in sub-28 nm technology node. There are two kind of overlay metrology in use in semiconductor industry: most conventional image-based overlay (IBO) metrology and advanced diffraction-based overlay(DBO) metrology. In this paper we will compare these two methods through 3 critical production layers, focusing on the accuracy and the total measurement uncertainty (TMU) for the standard overlay targets of both techniques. The results show that both the accuracy and TMU of DBO method are superior to the traditional IBO method, which makes DBO method applicable at the 28nm and below technology node.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTIC.2017.7919769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 China Semiconductor Technology International Conference (CSTIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTIC.2017.7919769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

覆盖控制是亚28nm技术节点下先进光刻技术面临的主要挑战之一。在半导体工业中使用的覆盖计量有两种:最传统的基于图像的覆盖(IBO)计量和先进的基于衍射的覆盖(DBO)计量。本文将通过3个关键生产层对这两种方法进行比较,重点讨论两种技术对标准覆盖目标的精度和总测量不确定度(TMU)。结果表明,DBO方法的精度和TMU均优于传统的IBO方法,使得DBO方法适用于28nm及以下的工艺节点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diffraction-based and image-based overlay evaluation for advanced technology node
The overlay control is one of the main challenges for advanced lithography in sub-28 nm technology node. There are two kind of overlay metrology in use in semiconductor industry: most conventional image-based overlay (IBO) metrology and advanced diffraction-based overlay(DBO) metrology. In this paper we will compare these two methods through 3 critical production layers, focusing on the accuracy and the total measurement uncertainty (TMU) for the standard overlay targets of both techniques. The results show that both the accuracy and TMU of DBO method are superior to the traditional IBO method, which makes DBO method applicable at the 28nm and below technology node.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wafer size MOS2 with few monolayer synthesized by H2S sulfurization A fast and low-cost TSV/TGV filling method Finger print sensor molding thickness none destructive measurement with Terahertz technology Research of SMO process to improve the imaging capability of lithography system for 28nm node and beyond The study on the moldability and reliability of epoxy molding compound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1