基于电子病历的家族性高胆固醇血症检测灵敏度:不同算法在基因确诊患者中的应用。

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2022-10-17 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059
Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Ralph K Akyea, Nadeem Qureshi, Willem A Bax, Jan H Cornel
{"title":"基于电子病历的家族性高胆固醇血症检测灵敏度:不同算法在基因确诊患者中的应用。","authors":"Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Ralph K Akyea, Nadeem Qureshi, Willem A Bax, Jan H Cornel","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of this and other algorithms in a genetically confirmed FH population.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>All patients with a healthcare insurance-related coded diagnosis of 'primary dyslipidaemia' between 2018 and 2020 were assessed for genetically confirmed FH. Data were extracted at the time of genetic confirmation of FH (T1) and during the first visit in 2018-2020 (T2). We assessed the sensitivity of algorithms on T1 and T2 for DLCN ≥ 6 and compared with other algorithms [familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT), Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED), and Simon Broome (SB)] using EHR-coded data and using all available data (i.e. including non-coded free text). 208 patients with genetically confirmed FH were included. The sensitivity (95% CI) on T1 and T2 with EHR-coded data for DLCN ≥ 6 was 19% (14-25%) and 22% (17-28%), respectively. When using all available data, the sensitivity for DLCN ≥ 6 was 26% (20-32%) on T1 and 28% (22-34%) on T2. For FAMCAT, the sensitivity with EHR-coded data on T1 was 74% (67-79%) and 32% (26-39%) on T2, whilst sensitivity with all available data was 81% on T1 (75-86%) and 45% (39-52%) on T2. For Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death MEDPED and SB, using all available data, the sensitivity on T1 was 31% (25-37%) and 17% (13-23%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAMCAT algorithm had significantly better sensitivity than DLCN, MEDPED, and SB. FAMCAT has the best potential for FH case-finding using EHRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/b8/ztac059.PMC9779787.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients.\",\"authors\":\"Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Ralph K Akyea, Nadeem Qureshi, Willem A Bax, Jan H Cornel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of this and other algorithms in a genetically confirmed FH population.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>All patients with a healthcare insurance-related coded diagnosis of 'primary dyslipidaemia' between 2018 and 2020 were assessed for genetically confirmed FH. Data were extracted at the time of genetic confirmation of FH (T1) and during the first visit in 2018-2020 (T2). We assessed the sensitivity of algorithms on T1 and T2 for DLCN ≥ 6 and compared with other algorithms [familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT), Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED), and Simon Broome (SB)] using EHR-coded data and using all available data (i.e. including non-coded free text). 208 patients with genetically confirmed FH were included. The sensitivity (95% CI) on T1 and T2 with EHR-coded data for DLCN ≥ 6 was 19% (14-25%) and 22% (17-28%), respectively. When using all available data, the sensitivity for DLCN ≥ 6 was 26% (20-32%) on T1 and 28% (22-34%) on T2. For FAMCAT, the sensitivity with EHR-coded data on T1 was 74% (67-79%) and 32% (26-39%) on T2, whilst sensitivity with all available data was 81% on T1 (75-86%) and 45% (39-52%) on T2. For Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death MEDPED and SB, using all available data, the sensitivity on T1 was 31% (25-37%) and 17% (13-23%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAMCAT algorithm had significantly better sensitivity than DLCN, MEDPED, and SB. FAMCAT has the best potential for FH case-finding using EHRs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/b8/ztac059.PMC9779787.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztac059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)是一种低密度脂蛋白胆固醇清除障碍,会导致心血管疾病风险增加。最近,我们开发了一种基于荷兰血脂诊所网络(DLCN)标准的算法,以方便在电子健康记录(EHR)中检测家族性高胆固醇血症。在这项研究中,我们调查了该算法和其他算法在经基因证实的高血脂人群中的灵敏度:对 2018 年至 2020 年期间所有与医疗保险相关的编码诊断为 "原发性血脂异常 "的患者进行了基因确诊 FH 评估。在 FH 基因确诊时(T1)和 2018-2020 年首次就诊时(T2)提取数据。我们评估了 T1 和 T2 算法对 DLCN ≥ 6 的敏感性,并使用电子病历编码数据和所有可用数据(即包括未编码的自由文本)与其他算法[家族性高胆固醇血症病例确定工具(FAMCAT)、早期诊断预防早期死亡(MEDPED)和西蒙-布鲁姆(SB)]进行了比较。共纳入 208 例经基因证实的 FH 患者。使用电子病历编码数据对 DLCN ≥ 6 的 T1 和 T2 的灵敏度(95% CI)分别为 19% (14-25%) 和 22% (17-28%)。当使用所有可用数据时,DLCN ≥ 6 的灵敏度在 T1 为 26% (20-32%),在 T2 为 28% (22-34%)。对于 FAMCAT,使用电子病历编码数据的灵敏度在 T1 为 74% (67-79%),在 T2 为 32% (26-39%),而使用所有可用数据的灵敏度在 T1 为 81% (75-86%),在 T2 为 45% (39-52%)。对于 "早期诊断,防止早死"(MEDPED)和 "早期诊断,防止早死"(SB),使用所有可用数据,T1 的灵敏度分别为 31% (25-37%) 和 17% (13-23%):FAMCAT 算法的灵敏度明显高于 DLCN、MEDPED 和 SB。FAMCAT 在使用电子病历查找 FH 病例方面具有最佳潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic health record-based facilitation of familial hypercholesterolaemia detection sensitivity of different algorithms in genetically confirmed patients.

Aims: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a disorder of LDL cholesterol clearance, resulting in increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently, we developed a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria-based algorithm to facilitate FH detection in electronic health records (EHRs). In this study, we investigated the sensitivity of this and other algorithms in a genetically confirmed FH population.

Methods and results: All patients with a healthcare insurance-related coded diagnosis of 'primary dyslipidaemia' between 2018 and 2020 were assessed for genetically confirmed FH. Data were extracted at the time of genetic confirmation of FH (T1) and during the first visit in 2018-2020 (T2). We assessed the sensitivity of algorithms on T1 and T2 for DLCN ≥ 6 and compared with other algorithms [familial hypercholesterolaemia case ascertainment tool (FAMCAT), Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death (MEDPED), and Simon Broome (SB)] using EHR-coded data and using all available data (i.e. including non-coded free text). 208 patients with genetically confirmed FH were included. The sensitivity (95% CI) on T1 and T2 with EHR-coded data for DLCN ≥ 6 was 19% (14-25%) and 22% (17-28%), respectively. When using all available data, the sensitivity for DLCN ≥ 6 was 26% (20-32%) on T1 and 28% (22-34%) on T2. For FAMCAT, the sensitivity with EHR-coded data on T1 was 74% (67-79%) and 32% (26-39%) on T2, whilst sensitivity with all available data was 81% on T1 (75-86%) and 45% (39-52%) on T2. For Make Early Diagnoses to Prevent Early Death MEDPED and SB, using all available data, the sensitivity on T1 was 31% (25-37%) and 17% (13-23%), respectively.

Conclusions: The FAMCAT algorithm had significantly better sensitivity than DLCN, MEDPED, and SB. FAMCAT has the best potential for FH case-finding using EHRs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-empowered treatment decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis via early detection of cardiac amyloidosis. Prediction of presence and severity of metabolic syndrome using regional body volumes measured by a multisensor white-light 3D scanner and validation using a mobile technology. Evaluating the impacts of digital ECG denoising on the interpretive capabilities of healthcare professionals. The use of imputation in clinical decision support systems: a cardiovascular risk management pilot vignette study among clinicians. Clinical and genetic associations of asymmetric apical and septal left ventricular hypertrophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1