Evaluating the impacts of digital ECG denoising on the interpretive capabilities of healthcare professionals.

Abstract

Aims: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an essential skill across multiple medical disciplines; yet, studies have consistently identified deficiencies in the interpretive performance of healthcare professionals linked to a variety of educational and technological factors. Despite the established correlation between noise interference and erroneous diagnoses, research evaluating the impacts of digital denoising software on clinical ECG interpretation proficiency is lacking.

Methods and results: Forty-eight participants from a variety of medical professions and experience levels were prospectively recruited for this study. Participants' capabilities in classifying common cardiac rhythms were evaluated using a sequential blinded and semi-blinded interpretation protocol on a challenging set of single-lead ECG signals (42 × 10 s) pre- and post-denoising with robust, cloud-based ECG processing software. Participants' ECG rhythm interpretation performance was greatest when raw and denoised signals were viewed in a combined format that enabled comparative evaluation. The combined view resulted in a 4.9% increase in mean rhythm classification accuracy (raw: 75.7% ± 14.5% vs. combined: 80.6% ± 12.5%, P = 0.0087), a 6.2% improvement in mean five-point graded confidence score (raw: 4.05 ± 0.58 vs. combined: 4.30 ± 0.48, P < 0.001), and 9.7% reduction in the mean proportion of undiagnosable data (raw: 14.2% ± 8.2% vs. combined: 4.5% ± 2.4%, P < 0.001), relative to raw signals alone. Participants also had a predominantly positive perception of denoising as it related to revealing previously unseen pathologies, improving ECG readability, and reducing time to diagnosis.

Conclusion: Our findings have demonstrated that digital denoising software improves the efficacy of rhythm interpretation on single-lead ECGs, particularly when raw and denoised signals are provided in a combined viewing format, warranting further investigation into the impact of such technology on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.