(新兴技术风险治理框架中决策工具的(再)概念化--纳米材料案例。

Environment systems & decisions Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s10669-022-09870-2
Martin Mullins, Martin Himly, Isabel Rodríguez Llopis, Irini Furxhi, Sabine Hofer, Norbert Hofstätter, Peter Wick, Daina Romeo, Dana Küehnel, Kirsi Siivola, Julia Catalán, Kerstin Hund-Rinke, Ioannis Xiarchos, Shona Linehan, Daan Schuurbiers, Amaia García Bilbao, Leire Barruetabeña, Damjana Drobne
{"title":"(新兴技术风险治理框架中决策工具的(再)概念化--纳米材料案例。","authors":"Martin Mullins, Martin Himly, Isabel Rodríguez Llopis, Irini Furxhi, Sabine Hofer, Norbert Hofstätter, Peter Wick, Daina Romeo, Dana Küehnel, Kirsi Siivola, Julia Catalán, Kerstin Hund-Rinke, Ioannis Xiarchos, Shona Linehan, Daan Schuurbiers, Amaia García Bilbao, Leire Barruetabeña, Damjana Drobne","doi":"10.1007/s10669-022-09870-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utility of decision-making tools for the risk governance of nanotechnology is at the core of this paper. Those working in nanotechnology risk management have been prolific in creating such tools, many derived from European FP7 and H2020-funded projects. What is less clear is how such tools might assist the overarching ambition of creating a fair system of risk governance. In this paper, we reflect upon the role that tools might and should play in any system of risk governance. With many tools designed for the risk governance of this emerging technology falling into disuse, this paper provides an overview of extant tools and addresses their potential shortcomings. We also posit the need for a data readiness tool. With the EUs NMP13 family of research consortia about to report to the Commission on ways forward in terms of risk governance of this domain, this is a timely intervention on an important element of any risk governance system.</p>","PeriodicalId":72928,"journal":{"name":"Environment systems & decisions","volume":"43 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)Conceptualizing decision-making tools in a risk governance framework for emerging technologies-the case of nanomaterials.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Mullins, Martin Himly, Isabel Rodríguez Llopis, Irini Furxhi, Sabine Hofer, Norbert Hofstätter, Peter Wick, Daina Romeo, Dana Küehnel, Kirsi Siivola, Julia Catalán, Kerstin Hund-Rinke, Ioannis Xiarchos, Shona Linehan, Daan Schuurbiers, Amaia García Bilbao, Leire Barruetabeña, Damjana Drobne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10669-022-09870-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The utility of decision-making tools for the risk governance of nanotechnology is at the core of this paper. Those working in nanotechnology risk management have been prolific in creating such tools, many derived from European FP7 and H2020-funded projects. What is less clear is how such tools might assist the overarching ambition of creating a fair system of risk governance. In this paper, we reflect upon the role that tools might and should play in any system of risk governance. With many tools designed for the risk governance of this emerging technology falling into disuse, this paper provides an overview of extant tools and addresses their potential shortcomings. We also posit the need for a data readiness tool. With the EUs NMP13 family of research consortia about to report to the Commission on ways forward in terms of risk governance of this domain, this is a timely intervention on an important element of any risk governance system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment systems & decisions\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"3-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment systems & decisions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09870-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment systems & decisions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09870-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的核心是纳米技术风险治理决策工具的实用性。从事纳米技术风险管 理工作的人员已经大量开发了此类工具,其中 许多来自欧洲 FP7 和 H2020 资助的项目。目前还不太清楚的是,这些工具可如何帮助实现创建公平风险治理系统的总体目标。在本文中,我们将思考工具在任何风险治理体系中可能和应该发挥的作用。由于许多为这一新兴技术的风险治理而设计的工具已被废弃,本文对现有工具进行了概述,并探讨了其潜在的不足之处。我们还提出了对数据准备工具的需求。随着欧盟 NMP13 研究联盟即将向欧盟委员会报告该领域风险治理的前进方向,本文对任何风险治理系统的一个重要元素进行了及时的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Re)Conceptualizing decision-making tools in a risk governance framework for emerging technologies-the case of nanomaterials.

The utility of decision-making tools for the risk governance of nanotechnology is at the core of this paper. Those working in nanotechnology risk management have been prolific in creating such tools, many derived from European FP7 and H2020-funded projects. What is less clear is how such tools might assist the overarching ambition of creating a fair system of risk governance. In this paper, we reflect upon the role that tools might and should play in any system of risk governance. With many tools designed for the risk governance of this emerging technology falling into disuse, this paper provides an overview of extant tools and addresses their potential shortcomings. We also posit the need for a data readiness tool. With the EUs NMP13 family of research consortia about to report to the Commission on ways forward in terms of risk governance of this domain, this is a timely intervention on an important element of any risk governance system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structured decision making remains underused in ecological restoration despite opportunities A generalized framework for designing open-source natural hazard parametric insurance A self-adaptation-based approach to resilience improvement of complex internets of utility systems A performance comparison of machine learning models for wildfire occurrence risk prediction in the Brazilian Federal District region Climate labels and the restaurant industry: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1