{"title":"远程医疗与自检相结合的抗凝管理在心血管疾病中的价值:一项随机对照试验的meta分析","authors":"Yu Huang, Yilian Xie, Lei Huang, Zhen Han","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S395578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>No consensus has been established on the safety and effectiveness of out-of-hospital management of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine. The present meta-analysis investigated the safety and effectiveness of this hybrid anticoagulants management model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for papers published before May 1, 2022. To reduce bias, only randomized controlled trials were included. RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane) software was used to evaluate and analyze clinical outcomes, including the effectiveness and safety of patient management approaches, determined by the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, comprising 3853 patients, were selected. The meta-analysis showed that anticoagulant management combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine significantly improved frequency of testing (mean difference [MD]= 12.95 days; 95% CI, 8.77-17.12; I<sup>2</sup>= 92%; P< 0.01) and TTR (MD= 9.50%; 95% CI, 3.16-15.85; I<sup>2</sup>= 87%; P< 0.01). Thromboembolism events were reduced (RR= 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; I<sup>2</sup>= 0%; P= 0.05), but the results were not statistically significant. And no significant differences in major bleeding events, rehospitalization rate, mortality, or overall treatment cost existed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the safety of remote cardiovascular disease management is not superior to that of conventional outpatient anticoagulant management, it provides a more stable monitoring of coagulation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"279-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/be/tcrm-19-279.PMC10024473.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of Anticoagulation Management Combining Telemedicine and Self-Testing in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Huang, Yilian Xie, Lei Huang, Zhen Han\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S395578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>No consensus has been established on the safety and effectiveness of out-of-hospital management of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine. The present meta-analysis investigated the safety and effectiveness of this hybrid anticoagulants management model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for papers published before May 1, 2022. To reduce bias, only randomized controlled trials were included. RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane) software was used to evaluate and analyze clinical outcomes, including the effectiveness and safety of patient management approaches, determined by the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, comprising 3853 patients, were selected. The meta-analysis showed that anticoagulant management combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine significantly improved frequency of testing (mean difference [MD]= 12.95 days; 95% CI, 8.77-17.12; I<sup>2</sup>= 92%; P< 0.01) and TTR (MD= 9.50%; 95% CI, 3.16-15.85; I<sup>2</sup>= 87%; P< 0.01). Thromboembolism events were reduced (RR= 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; I<sup>2</sup>= 0%; P= 0.05), but the results were not statistically significant. And no significant differences in major bleeding events, rehospitalization rate, mortality, or overall treatment cost existed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the safety of remote cardiovascular disease management is not superior to that of conventional outpatient anticoagulant management, it provides a more stable monitoring of coagulation status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"279-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/be/tcrm-19-279.PMC10024473.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S395578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S395578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Value of Anticoagulation Management Combining Telemedicine and Self-Testing in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Purpose: No consensus has been established on the safety and effectiveness of out-of-hospital management of Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine. The present meta-analysis investigated the safety and effectiveness of this hybrid anticoagulants management model.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for papers published before May 1, 2022. To reduce bias, only randomized controlled trials were included. RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane) software was used to evaluate and analyze clinical outcomes, including the effectiveness and safety of patient management approaches, determined by the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding events.
Results: Eight studies, comprising 3853 patients, were selected. The meta-analysis showed that anticoagulant management combining portable coagulometers and telemedicine significantly improved frequency of testing (mean difference [MD]= 12.95 days; 95% CI, 8.77-17.12; I2= 92%; P< 0.01) and TTR (MD= 9.50%; 95% CI, 3.16-15.85; I2= 87%; P< 0.01). Thromboembolism events were reduced (RR= 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01; I2= 0%; P= 0.05), but the results were not statistically significant. And no significant differences in major bleeding events, rehospitalization rate, mortality, or overall treatment cost existed between the two groups.
Conclusion: Although the safety of remote cardiovascular disease management is not superior to that of conventional outpatient anticoagulant management, it provides a more stable monitoring of coagulation status.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.