两种不同剂量依诺肝素用于非危重患者血栓预防的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5812/ijpr-126555
Ilad Alavi-Darazam, Kimia Forouhar, Omid Moradi, Ali Saffaei, Sara Asadi, Zahra Sahraei
{"title":"两种不同剂量依诺肝素用于非危重患者血栓预防的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ilad Alavi-Darazam,&nbsp;Kimia Forouhar,&nbsp;Omid Moradi,&nbsp;Ali Saffaei,&nbsp;Sara Asadi,&nbsp;Zahra Sahraei","doi":"10.5812/ijpr-126555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. While the intervention group received enoxaparin with a daily dose of 60 mg, the control group received enoxaparin 40 mg. Anti-factor Xa activity was measured based on the peak steady-state levels. The level of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was considered as a prophylactic goal. All individuals were followed for bleeding or thromboembolic events during admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean levels of anti-factor Xa were 0.29 ± 0.13 IU/mL in the control group (n = 31) and 0.44 ± 0.19 IU/mL in the intervention group (n = 29). More patients in the control group had an optimal level of anti-factor Xa compared to the patients in the intervention group (62.1% vs. 29%). No adverse outcomes were detected in any of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enoxaparin dose of 60 mg daily provided anti-factor Xa level higher than desired in most patients. In non-critically ill patients, the dose of 40 mg is the proper dose for thromboprophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14595,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"e126555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/b1/ijpr-21-1-126555.PMC10024325.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ilad Alavi-Darazam,&nbsp;Kimia Forouhar,&nbsp;Omid Moradi,&nbsp;Ali Saffaei,&nbsp;Sara Asadi,&nbsp;Zahra Sahraei\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijpr-126555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. While the intervention group received enoxaparin with a daily dose of 60 mg, the control group received enoxaparin 40 mg. Anti-factor Xa activity was measured based on the peak steady-state levels. The level of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was considered as a prophylactic goal. All individuals were followed for bleeding or thromboembolic events during admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean levels of anti-factor Xa were 0.29 ± 0.13 IU/mL in the control group (n = 31) and 0.44 ± 0.19 IU/mL in the intervention group (n = 29). More patients in the control group had an optimal level of anti-factor Xa compared to the patients in the intervention group (62.1% vs. 29%). No adverse outcomes were detected in any of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enoxaparin dose of 60 mg daily provided anti-factor Xa level higher than desired in most patients. In non-critically ill patients, the dose of 40 mg is the proper dose for thromboprophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"e126555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/b1/ijpr-21-1-126555.PMC10024325.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-126555\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-126555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,一些基于抗Xa因子活性水平的研究提出了依诺肝素常规剂量在外科和危重患者中的可疑和亚预防水平。在这项研究中,我们评估了成人非危重患者的两种剂量的依诺肝素。方法:将患者随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组每日给予依诺肝素60mg,对照组每日给予依诺肝素40mg。根据峰值稳态水平测量抗Xa因子活性。0.2 - 0.4 IU/mL的水平被认为是预防目标。所有患者在入院期间均随访出血或血栓栓塞事件。结果:对照组(n = 31)和干预组(n = 29)抗Xa因子平均水平分别为0.29±0.13 IU/mL和0.44±0.19 IU/mL。与干预组患者相比,对照组患者的抗Xa因子达到最佳水平的患者较多(62.1%对29%)。在任何组中均未发现不良结果。结论:依诺肝素60mg / d可使大多数患者的抗Xa因子水平高于预期。在非危重患者中,40mg的剂量是预防血栓形成的适当剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Doses for Thromboprophylaxis in Non-critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Recently, a few studies based on anti-factor Xa activity levels have propounded doubtful and sub-prophylactic levels by the usual dose of enoxaparin in surgical and critically ill patients. In this study, we assessed two doses of enoxaparin in adult non-critically ill patients.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. While the intervention group received enoxaparin with a daily dose of 60 mg, the control group received enoxaparin 40 mg. Anti-factor Xa activity was measured based on the peak steady-state levels. The level of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was considered as a prophylactic goal. All individuals were followed for bleeding or thromboembolic events during admission.

Results: The mean levels of anti-factor Xa were 0.29 ± 0.13 IU/mL in the control group (n = 31) and 0.44 ± 0.19 IU/mL in the intervention group (n = 29). More patients in the control group had an optimal level of anti-factor Xa compared to the patients in the intervention group (62.1% vs. 29%). No adverse outcomes were detected in any of the groups.

Conclusions: Enoxaparin dose of 60 mg daily provided anti-factor Xa level higher than desired in most patients. In non-critically ill patients, the dose of 40 mg is the proper dose for thromboprophylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
52
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research (IJPR) is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical publication, scheduled to appear quarterly and serve as a means for scientific information exchange in the international pharmaceutical forum. Specific scientific topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmaceutics, industrial pharmacy, pharmacognosy, toxicology, medicinal chemistry, novel analytical methods for drug characterization, computational and modeling approaches to drug design, bio-medical experience, clinical investigation, rational drug prescribing, pharmacoeconomics, biotechnology, nanotechnology, biopharmaceutics and physical pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
The Protective Effects of Pistacia Atlantica Gum in a Rat Model of Aluminum Chloride-Induced Alzheimer's Disease via Affecting BDNF and NF-kB. Comparison of the Areas Under the Curve of Vancomycin Continuous vs. Intermittent Infusion in Critically Ill Pediatrics: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Mitochondrial Transplantation Alleviates Doxorubicin-Induced Toxicity in Rat Renal Cells. Signal-On Fluorescence Biosensor for Detection of miRNA-21 Based on ROX labeled Specific Stem-Loop Probe. Development and Ex-Vivo Skin Permeation of Sildenafil Citrate Microemulsion System for Transdermal Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1