恐惧与愤怒的较量:政府和民粹主义的情感政治

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100240
Jörg Friedrichs , Niklas Stoehr , Giuliano Formisano
{"title":"恐惧与愤怒的较量:政府和民粹主义的情感政治","authors":"Jörg Friedrichs ,&nbsp;Niklas Stoehr ,&nbsp;Giuliano Formisano","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores how political actors use the emotions of fear and anger in what we call fear-anger contests. Our theory distinguishes between governmental and populist actors and posits that, in a contest for media attention and the hearts and minds of citizens, populists pursue a politics of anger whereas governmental actors pursue a politics of fear. To evaluate the theory, we examine two episodes of contentious politics: the 2016 Brexit referendum and the election of Donald Trump in the same year. We rely on automated sentiment analysis, using machine learning and emotion dictionaries to examine a dataset of social media posts on Twitter. In the case of Brexit, we find a fear-anger contest between Remain (“Project Fear”) and Leave (“Project Anger”). In the case of the 2016 US presidential election, we find a negativity contest where both parties reinforce each other's negative emotions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000428/pdfft?md5=924c9488e369ba56fa49ad7b1fc33cea&pid=1-s2.0-S2468696422000428-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear-anger contests: Governmental and populist politics of emotion\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Friedrichs ,&nbsp;Niklas Stoehr ,&nbsp;Giuliano Formisano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article explores how political actors use the emotions of fear and anger in what we call fear-anger contests. Our theory distinguishes between governmental and populist actors and posits that, in a contest for media attention and the hearts and minds of citizens, populists pursue a politics of anger whereas governmental actors pursue a politics of fear. To evaluate the theory, we examine two episodes of contentious politics: the 2016 Brexit referendum and the election of Donald Trump in the same year. We rely on automated sentiment analysis, using machine learning and emotion dictionaries to examine a dataset of social media posts on Twitter. In the case of Brexit, we find a fear-anger contest between Remain (“Project Fear”) and Leave (“Project Anger”). In the case of the 2016 US presidential election, we find a negativity contest where both parties reinforce each other's negative emotions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000428/pdfft?md5=924c9488e369ba56fa49ad7b1fc33cea&pid=1-s2.0-S2468696422000428-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇文章探讨了政治演员如何在我们所谓的恐惧-愤怒竞赛中使用恐惧和愤怒的情绪。我们的理论区分了政府和民粹主义行动者,并假设,在争夺媒体关注和公民心灵和思想的竞争中,民粹主义者追求愤怒的政治,而政府行动者追求恐惧的政治。为了评估这一理论,我们研究了两个有争议的政治事件:2016年英国脱欧公投和同年唐纳德·特朗普当选。我们依靠自动情感分析,使用机器学习和情感词典来检查Twitter上社交媒体帖子的数据集。就英国脱欧而言,我们发现留欧派(“恐惧计划”)和脱欧派(“愤怒计划”)之间存在一场恐惧与愤怒的较量。以2016年美国总统大选为例,我们发现了一场负面竞争,两党都在强化彼此的负面情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fear-anger contests: Governmental and populist politics of emotion

This article explores how political actors use the emotions of fear and anger in what we call fear-anger contests. Our theory distinguishes between governmental and populist actors and posits that, in a contest for media attention and the hearts and minds of citizens, populists pursue a politics of anger whereas governmental actors pursue a politics of fear. To evaluate the theory, we examine two episodes of contentious politics: the 2016 Brexit referendum and the election of Donald Trump in the same year. We rely on automated sentiment analysis, using machine learning and emotion dictionaries to examine a dataset of social media posts on Twitter. In the case of Brexit, we find a fear-anger contest between Remain (“Project Fear”) and Leave (“Project Anger”). In the case of the 2016 US presidential election, we find a negativity contest where both parties reinforce each other's negative emotions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1