与监禁史无关,可卡因使用障碍患者表现出对偶发性未来思维线索的延迟折扣降低

Q1 Psychology Addictive Behaviors Reports Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100518
Taylor M. Torres , Stuart R. Steinhauer , Steven D. Forman , Sarah E. Forster
{"title":"与监禁史无关,可卡因使用障碍患者表现出对偶发性未来思维线索的延迟折扣降低","authors":"Taylor M. Torres ,&nbsp;Stuart R. Steinhauer ,&nbsp;Steven D. Forman ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Forster","doi":"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research examining episodic future thinking (EFT; i.e., imagining oneself in future contexts) in community samples has demonstrated reduced discounting of delayed rewards when personalized event cues are included to prompt EFT related to reward latencies. While this EFT effect was recently demonstrated in individuals with substance use disorders, it is not yet known if it manifests similarly in individuals with and without a significant incarceration history—the latter being at elevated risk for negative outcomes including criminal recidivism. Individuals with cocaine use disorder (n = 35) identified personally-relevant future events and participated in a computerized delay discounting task, involving decisions between smaller immediate rewards or larger delayed rewards with and without EFT cues. Individuals with (n = 19) and without (n = 16) a significant history of incarceration were identified using the Addiction Severity Index-Lite. A significant reduction in discounting rates was observed when event cues were included to promote EFT (p = 0.02); however, there was no main effect of incarceration history on discounting behavior, or interaction between episodic future thinking condition and incarceration history. Results suggest personalized cues included to evoke EFT reduce discounting behavior in individuals with cocaine use disorder, regardless of incarceration history. EFT–based interventions may therefore have promise to reduce impulsive decision-making in individuals with cocaine use disorder with and without a significant history of incarceration, potentially supporting improved outcomes with respect to both substance use and future criminality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38040,"journal":{"name":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000408/pdfft?md5=9a8237de394fbed92f47ee561f44a8b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853223000408-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients with cocaine use disorder exhibit reductions in delay discounting with episodic future thinking cues regardless of incarceration history\",\"authors\":\"Taylor M. Torres ,&nbsp;Stuart R. Steinhauer ,&nbsp;Steven D. Forman ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Forster\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research examining episodic future thinking (EFT; i.e., imagining oneself in future contexts) in community samples has demonstrated reduced discounting of delayed rewards when personalized event cues are included to prompt EFT related to reward latencies. While this EFT effect was recently demonstrated in individuals with substance use disorders, it is not yet known if it manifests similarly in individuals with and without a significant incarceration history—the latter being at elevated risk for negative outcomes including criminal recidivism. Individuals with cocaine use disorder (n = 35) identified personally-relevant future events and participated in a computerized delay discounting task, involving decisions between smaller immediate rewards or larger delayed rewards with and without EFT cues. Individuals with (n = 19) and without (n = 16) a significant history of incarceration were identified using the Addiction Severity Index-Lite. A significant reduction in discounting rates was observed when event cues were included to promote EFT (p = 0.02); however, there was no main effect of incarceration history on discounting behavior, or interaction between episodic future thinking condition and incarceration history. Results suggest personalized cues included to evoke EFT reduce discounting behavior in individuals with cocaine use disorder, regardless of incarceration history. EFT–based interventions may therefore have promise to reduce impulsive decision-making in individuals with cocaine use disorder with and without a significant history of incarceration, potentially supporting improved outcomes with respect to both substance use and future criminality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000408/pdfft?md5=9a8237de394fbed92f47ee561f44a8b6&pid=1-s2.0-S2352853223000408-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive Behaviors Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive Behaviors Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情景未来思维(EFT)研究例如,想象自己在未来的情境中)在社区样本中显示,当包含个性化事件线索来提示与奖励延迟相关的EFT时,延迟奖励的折扣减少了。虽然这种EFT效应最近在有物质使用障碍的个体中得到了证实,但尚不清楚它是否在有或没有明显监禁史的个体中也有类似的表现——后者有更高的负面结果风险,包括犯罪累犯。可卡因使用障碍患者(n = 35)确定了与个人相关的未来事件,并参与了计算机延迟折扣任务,包括在有或没有EFT提示的情况下,在较小的即时奖励或较大的延迟奖励之间做出决定。有(n = 19)和没有(n = 16)显著监禁史的个体使用成瘾严重程度指数-生活进行鉴定。当包含事件线索以促进EFT时,观察到贴现率显着降低(p = 0.02);然而,监禁史对贴现行为没有主要影响,也没有情景未来思维条件与监禁史之间的交互作用。结果表明,包括诱发EFT在内的个性化线索可以减少可卡因使用障碍患者的折扣行为,而与监禁史无关。因此,基于eft的干预措施可能有望减少可卡因使用障碍患者的冲动决策,无论是否有明显的监禁史,都可能支持改善药物使用和未来犯罪的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients with cocaine use disorder exhibit reductions in delay discounting with episodic future thinking cues regardless of incarceration history

Research examining episodic future thinking (EFT; i.e., imagining oneself in future contexts) in community samples has demonstrated reduced discounting of delayed rewards when personalized event cues are included to prompt EFT related to reward latencies. While this EFT effect was recently demonstrated in individuals with substance use disorders, it is not yet known if it manifests similarly in individuals with and without a significant incarceration history—the latter being at elevated risk for negative outcomes including criminal recidivism. Individuals with cocaine use disorder (n = 35) identified personally-relevant future events and participated in a computerized delay discounting task, involving decisions between smaller immediate rewards or larger delayed rewards with and without EFT cues. Individuals with (n = 19) and without (n = 16) a significant history of incarceration were identified using the Addiction Severity Index-Lite. A significant reduction in discounting rates was observed when event cues were included to promote EFT (p = 0.02); however, there was no main effect of incarceration history on discounting behavior, or interaction between episodic future thinking condition and incarceration history. Results suggest personalized cues included to evoke EFT reduce discounting behavior in individuals with cocaine use disorder, regardless of incarceration history. EFT–based interventions may therefore have promise to reduce impulsive decision-making in individuals with cocaine use disorder with and without a significant history of incarceration, potentially supporting improved outcomes with respect to both substance use and future criminality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Addictive Behaviors Reports Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors Reports is an open-access and peer reviewed online-only journal offering an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research in addictive behaviors. The journal accepts submissions that are scientifically sound on all forms of addictive behavior (alcohol, drugs, gambling, Internet, nicotine and technology) with a primary focus on behavioral and psychosocial research. The emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. We are particularly interested in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research. Studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry as well as scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are also very much encouraged. We also welcome multimedia submissions that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
期刊最新文献
Genomic factors associated with substance use disorder relapse: A critical review Mokken scale analysis of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short-Form and the Gaming Disorder Test The influence of sociodemographic, tobacco use, and mental health characteristics on treatment adherence among adults enrolled in a community-based tobacco cessation program Examining problem gambling, substance use disorders and cluster B personality traits among incarcerated individuals Cigarette smoking status and COVID-19 hospitalization in the context of cannabis use: An electronic health record cohort study in northern California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1