组织学变异的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱保存

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Seminars in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.008
Andrew Brocklehurst , Mohini Varughese , Alison Birtle
{"title":"组织学变异的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的膀胱保存","authors":"Andrew Brocklehurst ,&nbsp;Mohini Varughese ,&nbsp;Alison Birtle","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A growing body of evidence has shown bladder-preservation with chemo-radiotherapy achieves comparable survival to Radical Cystectomy<span> (5-year OS 50%-70%) and superior quality of life<span> outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma<span> of the bladder (UC). However, up to 55% of patients harbor variant histology and in this review we aim to clarify the role of bladder-preservation for this group. We first draw the distinction between urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation (UCDD) and non-urothelial carcinoma (NUC). UCDD is common, increasing in prevalence, and whilst each subtype may have its own characteristics current evidence suggests comparable outcomes with radical cystectomy and bladder-preservation.</span></span></span></p><p><span><span>Non-urothelial carcinoma is a collection of distinct pathologies each deserving of its own management strategy. However, these tumors are rare, and evidence is generated from retrospective studies with significant inherent bias. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder has good evidence for bladder-preservation; however, other pathologies such as </span>Squamous Cell Carcinoma and </span>Adenocarcinoma<span> are not well supported. We recommend careful multidisciplinary appraisal of the evidence for each subtype and honest patient discussion about the limited evidence before reaching management decisions. As we look to the future molecular-profiling may help better characterize these tumors and aid in treatment selection.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bladder Preservation for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With Variant Histology\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Brocklehurst ,&nbsp;Mohini Varughese ,&nbsp;Alison Birtle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A growing body of evidence has shown bladder-preservation with chemo-radiotherapy achieves comparable survival to Radical Cystectomy<span> (5-year OS 50%-70%) and superior quality of life<span> outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma<span> of the bladder (UC). However, up to 55% of patients harbor variant histology and in this review we aim to clarify the role of bladder-preservation for this group. We first draw the distinction between urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation (UCDD) and non-urothelial carcinoma (NUC). UCDD is common, increasing in prevalence, and whilst each subtype may have its own characteristics current evidence suggests comparable outcomes with radical cystectomy and bladder-preservation.</span></span></span></p><p><span><span>Non-urothelial carcinoma is a collection of distinct pathologies each deserving of its own management strategy. However, these tumors are rare, and evidence is generated from retrospective studies with significant inherent bias. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder has good evidence for bladder-preservation; however, other pathologies such as </span>Squamous Cell Carcinoma and </span>Adenocarcinoma<span> are not well supported. We recommend careful multidisciplinary appraisal of the evidence for each subtype and honest patient discussion about the limited evidence before reaching management decisions. As we look to the future molecular-profiling may help better characterize these tumors and aid in treatment selection.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000625\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,放化疗保存膀胱可获得与根治性膀胱切除术相当的生存率(5年OS 50%-70%),并使肌肉浸润性膀胱上皮癌(UC)患者获得更高的生活质量。然而,高达55%的患者具有不同的组织学,在这篇综述中,我们旨在阐明膀胱保存在这一群体中的作用。我们首先对分化型尿路上皮癌(UCDD)和非尿路上皮癌症(NUC)进行了区分。UCDD很常见,患病率越来越高,虽然每种亚型都可能有自己的特点,但目前的证据表明,与根治性膀胱切除术和膀胱保留术的结果相当。非上皮性癌是一组不同的病理学,每种病理学都应该有自己的治疗策略。然而,这些肿瘤是罕见的,证据来自具有显著固有偏见的回顾性研究。膀胱小细胞癌具有良好的膀胱保存证据;然而,诸如鳞状细胞癌和腺癌之类的其他病理学并没有得到很好的支持。我们建议对每种亚型的证据进行仔细的多学科评估,并在做出管理决策之前对有限的证据进行诚实的患者讨论。展望未来,分子图谱可能有助于更好地表征这些肿瘤,并有助于选择治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bladder Preservation for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With Variant Histology

A growing body of evidence has shown bladder-preservation with chemo-radiotherapy achieves comparable survival to Radical Cystectomy (5-year OS 50%-70%) and superior quality of life outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UC). However, up to 55% of patients harbor variant histology and in this review we aim to clarify the role of bladder-preservation for this group. We first draw the distinction between urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation (UCDD) and non-urothelial carcinoma (NUC). UCDD is common, increasing in prevalence, and whilst each subtype may have its own characteristics current evidence suggests comparable outcomes with radical cystectomy and bladder-preservation.

Non-urothelial carcinoma is a collection of distinct pathologies each deserving of its own management strategy. However, these tumors are rare, and evidence is generated from retrospective studies with significant inherent bias. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder has good evidence for bladder-preservation; however, other pathologies such as Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma are not well supported. We recommend careful multidisciplinary appraisal of the evidence for each subtype and honest patient discussion about the limited evidence before reaching management decisions. As we look to the future molecular-profiling may help better characterize these tumors and aid in treatment selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.
期刊最新文献
Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making Safe Hypofractionation Amid Diverse Technologies: Using Teamwork to Manage the Complexity Advancing the Collaboration Between Imaging and Radiation Oncology Future of Multidisciplinary Team in the Context of Adaptive Therapy Green Horizons in Oncology: A Blueprint for Environmentally Sustainable Radiation Therapy Facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1