月经过多的未来研究

T. Justin Clark, Khalid S. Khan
{"title":"月经过多的未来研究","authors":"T. Justin Clark,&nbsp;Khalid S. Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Menorrhagia is a common clinical problem in routine gynaecological practice. Optimal methods for diagnostic work up and therapeutic interventions remain topics for ongoing debate. This can be explained in part by rapid advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. However, the limited quality of available evidence due to inadequate study conception, design and conduct is responsible for much of this uncertainty. Future research should concentrate on a robust approach to the assessment of health technologies used in diagnosis and treatment, so that relevant studies capable of answering well-formulated research questions are designed. Outcomes of importance to patients, namely health related quality of life, should be used as primary outcome measures. Specific areas highlighted for research in this review include the role of particular diagnostic modalities, such as ultrasound and hysteroscopy, in terms of their ability to change patient outcome thorough primary research and decision-analytic modelling. The place of minimally invasive therapies and appropriate utilisation of the outpatient ‘ambulatory’ setting requires clarification through randomised controlled trials. Economic endpoints need to be assessed to facilitate a rational basis on which to allocate resources and upon which to base clinical decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101089,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.03.003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future research in menorrhagia\",\"authors\":\"T. Justin Clark,&nbsp;Khalid S. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rigp.2005.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Menorrhagia is a common clinical problem in routine gynaecological practice. Optimal methods for diagnostic work up and therapeutic interventions remain topics for ongoing debate. This can be explained in part by rapid advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. However, the limited quality of available evidence due to inadequate study conception, design and conduct is responsible for much of this uncertainty. Future research should concentrate on a robust approach to the assessment of health technologies used in diagnosis and treatment, so that relevant studies capable of answering well-formulated research questions are designed. Outcomes of importance to patients, namely health related quality of life, should be used as primary outcome measures. Specific areas highlighted for research in this review include the role of particular diagnostic modalities, such as ultrasound and hysteroscopy, in terms of their ability to change patient outcome thorough primary research and decision-analytic modelling. The place of minimally invasive therapies and appropriate utilisation of the outpatient ‘ambulatory’ setting requires clarification through randomised controlled trials. Economic endpoints need to be assessed to facilitate a rational basis on which to allocate resources and upon which to base clinical decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 71-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigp.2005.03.003\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769705000213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471769705000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

月经过多是妇科常规实践中常见的临床问题。诊断工作和治疗干预的最佳方法仍然是持续争论的主题。这可以部分解释为诊断和治疗技术的快速发展。然而,由于不充分的研究概念、设计和实施,现有证据的质量有限是造成这种不确定性的主要原因。未来的研究应集中于对诊断和治疗中使用的卫生技术进行评估的有力方法,以便设计出能够回答精心制定的研究问题的相关研究。对患者重要的结局,即与健康相关的生活质量,应作为主要结局指标。本综述强调的具体研究领域包括特殊诊断模式的作用,如超声和宫腔镜,就其改变患者预后的能力而言,通过初步研究和决策分析模型。微创治疗的位置和门诊“门诊”设置的适当利用需要通过随机对照试验来澄清。需要对经济终点进行评估,以促进资源分配和临床决策的合理基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future research in menorrhagia

Menorrhagia is a common clinical problem in routine gynaecological practice. Optimal methods for diagnostic work up and therapeutic interventions remain topics for ongoing debate. This can be explained in part by rapid advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. However, the limited quality of available evidence due to inadequate study conception, design and conduct is responsible for much of this uncertainty. Future research should concentrate on a robust approach to the assessment of health technologies used in diagnosis and treatment, so that relevant studies capable of answering well-formulated research questions are designed. Outcomes of importance to patients, namely health related quality of life, should be used as primary outcome measures. Specific areas highlighted for research in this review include the role of particular diagnostic modalities, such as ultrasound and hysteroscopy, in terms of their ability to change patient outcome thorough primary research and decision-analytic modelling. The place of minimally invasive therapies and appropriate utilisation of the outpatient ‘ambulatory’ setting requires clarification through randomised controlled trials. Economic endpoints need to be assessed to facilitate a rational basis on which to allocate resources and upon which to base clinical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Non-surgical management of urinary stress incontinence Common congenital anomalies of the female genital tract Investigations for chronic pelvic pain How to manage locally advanced primary and recurrent cancer of the uterine cervix: The surgeon's view
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1