St. Göb , S. Sawant , F.X. Erick , C. Schmidkonz , A. Ramming , E.W. Lang , T. Wittenberg , Th.I. Götz
{"title":"以显微图像细胞分割为初步应用实例,比较不同聚合模型的集成方法","authors":"St. Göb , S. Sawant , F.X. Erick , C. Schmidkonz , A. Ramming , E.W. Lang , T. Wittenberg , Th.I. Götz","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strategies such as <em>ensemble learning</em> and <em>averaging techniques</em> try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on <em>ensemble averaging</em> techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an application example, various ensembles have been initialized and formed during network training, whereby the following methods have been applied: (a) random seeds, (b) <em>L</em><sub>1</sub>-norm pruning, (c) variable numbers of training examples, and (d) a combination of the latter 2 items. Furthermore, different averaging methods are in common use and were evaluated in this study. As averaging methods, the <em>mean</em>, the <em>median,</em> and the <em>location parameter</em> of an <em>alpha-stable distribution</em>, fit to the histograms of class membership probabilities (CMPs), as well as a <em>majority</em> vote of the members of an ensemble were considered. The performance of these methods is demonstrated and evaluated on a micrograph cell segmentation use case, employing a common state-of-the art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture exploiting the principle of the common VGG-architecture. The study demonstrates that for this data set, the choice of the ensemble averaging method only has a marginal influence on the evaluation metrics (accuracy and Dice coefficient) used to measure the segmentation performance. Nevertheless, for practical applications, a simple and fast estimate of the mean of the distribution is highly competitive with respect to the most sophisticated representation of the CMP distributions by an alpha-stable distribution, and hence seems the most proper ensemble averaging method to be used for this application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034515/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example\",\"authors\":\"St. Göb , S. Sawant , F.X. Erick , C. Schmidkonz , A. Ramming , E.W. Lang , T. Wittenberg , Th.I. Götz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Strategies such as <em>ensemble learning</em> and <em>averaging techniques</em> try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on <em>ensemble averaging</em> techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an application example, various ensembles have been initialized and formed during network training, whereby the following methods have been applied: (a) random seeds, (b) <em>L</em><sub>1</sub>-norm pruning, (c) variable numbers of training examples, and (d) a combination of the latter 2 items. Furthermore, different averaging methods are in common use and were evaluated in this study. As averaging methods, the <em>mean</em>, the <em>median,</em> and the <em>location parameter</em> of an <em>alpha-stable distribution</em>, fit to the histograms of class membership probabilities (CMPs), as well as a <em>majority</em> vote of the members of an ensemble were considered. The performance of these methods is demonstrated and evaluated on a micrograph cell segmentation use case, employing a common state-of-the art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture exploiting the principle of the common VGG-architecture. The study demonstrates that for this data set, the choice of the ensemble averaging method only has a marginal influence on the evaluation metrics (accuracy and Dice coefficient) used to measure the segmentation performance. Nevertheless, for practical applications, a simple and fast estimate of the mean of the distribution is highly competitive with respect to the most sophisticated representation of the CMP distributions by an alpha-stable distribution, and hence seems the most proper ensemble averaging method to be used for this application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923001189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923001189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing ensemble methods combined with different aggregating models using micrograph cell segmentation as an initial application example
Strategies such as ensemble learning and averaging techniques try to reduce the variance of single deep neural networks. The focus of this study is on ensemble averaging techniques, fusing the results of differently initialized and trained networks. Thereby, using micrograph cell segmentation as an application example, various ensembles have been initialized and formed during network training, whereby the following methods have been applied: (a) random seeds, (b) L1-norm pruning, (c) variable numbers of training examples, and (d) a combination of the latter 2 items. Furthermore, different averaging methods are in common use and were evaluated in this study. As averaging methods, the mean, the median, and the location parameter of an alpha-stable distribution, fit to the histograms of class membership probabilities (CMPs), as well as a majority vote of the members of an ensemble were considered. The performance of these methods is demonstrated and evaluated on a micrograph cell segmentation use case, employing a common state-of-the art deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture exploiting the principle of the common VGG-architecture. The study demonstrates that for this data set, the choice of the ensemble averaging method only has a marginal influence on the evaluation metrics (accuracy and Dice coefficient) used to measure the segmentation performance. Nevertheless, for practical applications, a simple and fast estimate of the mean of the distribution is highly competitive with respect to the most sophisticated representation of the CMP distributions by an alpha-stable distribution, and hence seems the most proper ensemble averaging method to be used for this application.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.