新辅助化疗在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌膀胱保留入路中的作用

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Seminars in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006
Carlos Stecca , Timur Mitin , Srikala S. Sridhar
{"title":"新辅助化疗在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌膀胱保留入路中的作用","authors":"Carlos Stecca ,&nbsp;Timur Mitin ,&nbsp;Srikala S. Sridhar","doi":"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the </span>standard of care<span> for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing </span></span>radical cystectomy<span> (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials<span> showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49542,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Preservation Approaches in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Stecca ,&nbsp;Timur Mitin ,&nbsp;Srikala S. Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the </span>standard of care<span> for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing </span></span>radical cystectomy<span> (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials<span> showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000601\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053429622000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新辅助化疗(NAC)旨在消除微转移性疾病,已被确立为癌症(MIBC)患者进行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的护理标准。这是基于随机对照试验,表明与单独使用RC相比,NAC在RC之前具有生存益处。预计在膀胱保留方法之前给予NAC也会有类似的生存益处,但据报道,探索这一概念的e III期RTOG 8903研究是一项负面研究。然而,有一些重要的注意事项需要考虑。首先,选择保留膀胱的患者的情况已经从年龄较大、更虚弱的非手术候选者发生了变化,现在也包括选择保留膀胱且更容易耐受NAC的更年轻、更健康的患者。近年来,在全身化疗、免疫疗法、放射技术和支持性护理方面也取得了重要进展。因此,在MIBC中膀胱保留方法之前重新审视NAC的作用似乎是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Preservation Approaches in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease, has been established as the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). This is based on randomized controlled trials showing a survival benefit of NAC prior to RC compared to RC alone. It was anticipated that a similar survival benefit would also be seen when NAC was given prior to bladder preserving approaches, but the e phase III RTOG 8903 study which explored this concept was reported to be a negative study. However, there are a number of important caveats to be considered. First, the profile of patients opting for bladder preservation has changed from the older, frailer non-surgical candidates, to now also include younger, fitter patients opting for bladder preservation and who are also more likely to tolerate NAC. In recent years, there have also been important advances in systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation techniques, and supportive care. As such revisitng the role of NAC prior to bladder preserving approaches in MIBC appears warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Radiation Oncology is compiled by a guest editor to address a specific topic in the specialty, presenting definitive information on areas of rapid change and development. A significant number of articles report new scientific information. Topics covered include tumor biology, diagnosis, medical and surgical management of the patient, and new technologies.
期刊最新文献
Radiation as an Immune Modulator: Where We Are With Modern Total Body Irradiation. Radiation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: Indications, Safety, and Dose Selection. Rising to the Top: How Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors are Changing the Landscape of Treatment for Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma. Translating Between Radiation Dose and Late Toxicity for Lymphoma Survivors: Implications on Toxicity Counseling and Survivorship. Advanced Stage Hodgkin and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Is There Still a Role for Consolidation Radiotherapy in the PET Era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1