手术机器人的安全设计——一种综合危险识别的系统方法。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1515/bmt-2022-0202
Lukas Theisgen, Florian Strauch, Matías de la Fuente Klein, Klaus Radermacher
{"title":"手术机器人的安全设计——一种综合危险识别的系统方法。","authors":"Lukas Theisgen,&nbsp;Florian Strauch,&nbsp;Matías de la Fuente Klein,&nbsp;Klaus Radermacher","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2022-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the 1980s, robotic arms have been transferred from industrial applications to orthopaedic surgical robotics. Adverse events are frequent and often associated with the adopted powerful and oversized anthropomorphic arms. The FDA's 510(k) pathway encourages building on such systems, leading to the adoption of hazards, which is known as \"predicate creep\". Additionally, the methodology of hazard identification for medical device development needs improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present an approach to enhance general hazard identification and prevent hazards of predicate creep by using the integrative, scenario-based and multi-perspective Point-of-View (PoV) approach. We also present the Catalogue of Hazards (CoH) as an approach for collecting and systematising hazards for future risk analysis and robot development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We applied seven predefined PoVs to the use case of robotic laminectomy and identified 133 hazards, mainly coming from HMI analysis and literature. By analysing the MAUDE and recalls databases of the FDA, we were able to classify historical hazards and adopt them into the use case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of PoV approach and CoH is suitable for integrating multiple established hazard identification methods, increasing comprehensiveness, and supporting the systematic and hazard-based development of surgical robots.</p>","PeriodicalId":8900,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe design of surgical robots - a systematic approach to comprehensive hazard identification.\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Theisgen,&nbsp;Florian Strauch,&nbsp;Matías de la Fuente Klein,&nbsp;Klaus Radermacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bmt-2022-0202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the 1980s, robotic arms have been transferred from industrial applications to orthopaedic surgical robotics. Adverse events are frequent and often associated with the adopted powerful and oversized anthropomorphic arms. The FDA's 510(k) pathway encourages building on such systems, leading to the adoption of hazards, which is known as \\\"predicate creep\\\". Additionally, the methodology of hazard identification for medical device development needs improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present an approach to enhance general hazard identification and prevent hazards of predicate creep by using the integrative, scenario-based and multi-perspective Point-of-View (PoV) approach. We also present the Catalogue of Hazards (CoH) as an approach for collecting and systematising hazards for future risk analysis and robot development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We applied seven predefined PoVs to the use case of robotic laminectomy and identified 133 hazards, mainly coming from HMI analysis and literature. By analysing the MAUDE and recalls databases of the FDA, we were able to classify historical hazards and adopt them into the use case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of PoV approach and CoH is suitable for integrating multiple established hazard identification methods, increasing comprehensiveness, and supporting the systematic and hazard-based development of surgical robots.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2022-0202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:自20世纪80年代以来,机械臂已经从工业应用转移到骨科手术机器人。不良事件经常发生,并且通常与采用的强大和过大的拟人化手臂有关。FDA的510(k)路径鼓励建立这样的系统,导致采用危害,这被称为“谓词蠕变”。此外,医疗器械开发的危害识别方法需要改进。方法:我们提出了一种方法,通过使用综合的、基于场景的和多视角的观点(PoV)方法来增强一般危害识别和预防谓词蠕变的危害。我们还提出了危险目录(CoH)作为收集和系统化未来风险分析和机器人开发的危险的方法。结果:我们将7个预定义的pov应用于机器人椎板切除术的使用案例,并确定了133种危害,主要来自HMI分析和文献。通过分析FDA的MAUDE和召回数据库,我们能够对历史危害进行分类,并将其纳入用例。结论:PoV方法与CoH相结合适用于整合多种已建立的危害识别方法,增加综合性,支持手术机器人的系统化、基于危害的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safe design of surgical robots - a systematic approach to comprehensive hazard identification.

Objectives: Since the 1980s, robotic arms have been transferred from industrial applications to orthopaedic surgical robotics. Adverse events are frequent and often associated with the adopted powerful and oversized anthropomorphic arms. The FDA's 510(k) pathway encourages building on such systems, leading to the adoption of hazards, which is known as "predicate creep". Additionally, the methodology of hazard identification for medical device development needs improvement.

Methods: We present an approach to enhance general hazard identification and prevent hazards of predicate creep by using the integrative, scenario-based and multi-perspective Point-of-View (PoV) approach. We also present the Catalogue of Hazards (CoH) as an approach for collecting and systematising hazards for future risk analysis and robot development.

Results: We applied seven predefined PoVs to the use case of robotic laminectomy and identified 133 hazards, mainly coming from HMI analysis and literature. By analysing the MAUDE and recalls databases of the FDA, we were able to classify historical hazards and adopt them into the use case.

Conclusions: The combination of PoV approach and CoH is suitable for integrating multiple established hazard identification methods, increasing comprehensiveness, and supporting the systematic and hazard-based development of surgical robots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik (BMT) is a high-quality forum for the exchange of knowledge in the fields of biomedical engineering, medical information technology and biotechnology/bioengineering. As an established journal with a tradition of more than 60 years, BMT addresses engineers, natural scientists, and clinicians working in research, industry, or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the RF depositions at 3T in routine clinical scans with respect to the SAR safety to improve efficiency of MRI utilization Comparative evaluation of volumetry estimation from plain and contrast enhanced computed tomography liver images Sparse-view CT reconstruction based on group-based sparse representation using weighted guided image filtering Actuators and transmission mechanisms in rehabilitation lower limb exoskeletons: a review Abstracts of the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society for Biomedical Engineering (ÖGBMT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1