2018年和2019年西班牙生育协会国家活动登记的人工授精(配偶和捐赠者)结果

Luis Martínez-Granados , Irene Cuevas , Fernando Prados , Isabel Pons , Montserrat de Andrés , Lourdes Sánchez-Castro , Rafael Lafuente , María José de los Santos , Julio Herrero , Yolanda Cabello , Ana Belén Castel , Ignacio Rodríguez , Luis Gijón , José Antonio Castilla
{"title":"2018年和2019年西班牙生育协会国家活动登记的人工授精(配偶和捐赠者)结果","authors":"Luis Martínez-Granados ,&nbsp;Irene Cuevas ,&nbsp;Fernando Prados ,&nbsp;Isabel Pons ,&nbsp;Montserrat de Andrés ,&nbsp;Lourdes Sánchez-Castro ,&nbsp;Rafael Lafuente ,&nbsp;María José de los Santos ,&nbsp;Julio Herrero ,&nbsp;Yolanda Cabello ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Castel ,&nbsp;Ignacio Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luis Gijón ,&nbsp;José Antonio Castilla","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introduction. Artificial insemination is a widely used assisted reproduction technique, despite controversy over its usefulness. This document presents the data from the National Register of Activity in Assisted Human Reproduction (RNA – Register SEF), for Artificial Insemination during 2018 and 2019.</p><p>Material and methods. The data for conjugal and donor artificial insemination (AI-C and AI-D respectively) collected by the RNA – Register SEF during 2018 and 2019 was analysed and compared with data obtained in previous years. Participation was mandatory for Spanish assisted reproduction centres and annual aggregate data was collected by centre and in situ monitoring carried out at random on data provided by more than 15% of participating centres. A total of 34,100 cycles were analysed in 2018 (21,467 AI-C cycles and 12,633 AI-D cycles) and 32,548 cycles in 2019 (18,948 AI-C and 13,564 AI-D cycles).</p><p>Results. No significant differences were observed in the overall gestation rate per cycle, either for AI-C (2018: 13.1%; 2019: 12.8%) or for AI-D (2018: 19.0%; 2019: 18.8%). In 2018, 11.6% of the pregnancies obtained through AI-C were multiple pregnancies. Similar figures of 9.9% were obtained in 2019. Similar results have been observed in AI-D, where the multiple gestation rate was 10.7% in 2018 and 8.9% in 2019. In pregnancies obtained with AI-C, 17.8% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 16.3% in 2019. With the donor technique, 18.0% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 18.0% in 2019.</p><p>Conclusions. Despite a slight increase in the number of participating centres, a decrease is observed in the use of AI-C, but this trend does not occur with AI-D.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resultados de inseminación artificial (conyugales y de donante) del Registro Nacional de Actividad – Registro de la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad en los años 2018 y 2019\",\"authors\":\"Luis Martínez-Granados ,&nbsp;Irene Cuevas ,&nbsp;Fernando Prados ,&nbsp;Isabel Pons ,&nbsp;Montserrat de Andrés ,&nbsp;Lourdes Sánchez-Castro ,&nbsp;Rafael Lafuente ,&nbsp;María José de los Santos ,&nbsp;Julio Herrero ,&nbsp;Yolanda Cabello ,&nbsp;Ana Belén Castel ,&nbsp;Ignacio Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Luis Gijón ,&nbsp;José Antonio Castilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Introduction. Artificial insemination is a widely used assisted reproduction technique, despite controversy over its usefulness. This document presents the data from the National Register of Activity in Assisted Human Reproduction (RNA – Register SEF), for Artificial Insemination during 2018 and 2019.</p><p>Material and methods. The data for conjugal and donor artificial insemination (AI-C and AI-D respectively) collected by the RNA – Register SEF during 2018 and 2019 was analysed and compared with data obtained in previous years. Participation was mandatory for Spanish assisted reproduction centres and annual aggregate data was collected by centre and in situ monitoring carried out at random on data provided by more than 15% of participating centres. A total of 34,100 cycles were analysed in 2018 (21,467 AI-C cycles and 12,633 AI-D cycles) and 32,548 cycles in 2019 (18,948 AI-C and 13,564 AI-D cycles).</p><p>Results. No significant differences were observed in the overall gestation rate per cycle, either for AI-C (2018: 13.1%; 2019: 12.8%) or for AI-D (2018: 19.0%; 2019: 18.8%). In 2018, 11.6% of the pregnancies obtained through AI-C were multiple pregnancies. Similar figures of 9.9% were obtained in 2019. Similar results have been observed in AI-D, where the multiple gestation rate was 10.7% in 2018 and 8.9% in 2019. In pregnancies obtained with AI-C, 17.8% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 16.3% in 2019. With the donor technique, 18.0% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 18.0% in 2019.</p><p>Conclusions. Despite a slight increase in the number of participating centres, a decrease is observed in the use of AI-C, but this trend does not occur with AI-D.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。人工授精是一种广泛使用的辅助生殖技术,尽管其实用性存在争议。本文件介绍了2018年和2019年人工授精国家辅助人类生殖活动登记册(RNA - Register SEF)的数据。材料和方法。对RNA - Register SEF在2018年和2019年收集的配偶人工授精和供体人工授精(分别为AI-C和AI-D)数据进行分析,并与往年的数据进行比较。西班牙辅助生殖中心的参与是强制性的,各中心每年收集汇总数据,并随机对超过15%的参与中心提供的数据进行现场监测。2018年共分析了34,100个周期(21,467个AI-C周期和12,633个AI-D周期),2019年共分析了32,548个周期(18,948个AI-C周期和13,564个AI-D周期)。AI-C的每周期总妊娠率均无显著差异(2018年:13.1%;2019年:12.8%)或AI-D(2018年:19.0%;2019年:18.8%)。2018年,通过人工智能- c获得的妊娠中有11.6%是多胎妊娠。2019年也获得了类似的9.9%的数据。在AI-D中也观察到类似的结果,2018年的多胎妊娠率为10.7%,2019年为8.9%。在人工智能- c妊娠中,2018年流产率为17.8%,2019年为16.3%。采用供体技术,2018年流产率为18.0%,2019年为18.0%。尽管参与中心的数量略有增加,但人工智能- c的使用有所减少,但人工智能- d没有出现这种趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resultados de inseminación artificial (conyugales y de donante) del Registro Nacional de Actividad – Registro de la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad en los años 2018 y 2019

Introduction. Artificial insemination is a widely used assisted reproduction technique, despite controversy over its usefulness. This document presents the data from the National Register of Activity in Assisted Human Reproduction (RNA – Register SEF), for Artificial Insemination during 2018 and 2019.

Material and methods. The data for conjugal and donor artificial insemination (AI-C and AI-D respectively) collected by the RNA – Register SEF during 2018 and 2019 was analysed and compared with data obtained in previous years. Participation was mandatory for Spanish assisted reproduction centres and annual aggregate data was collected by centre and in situ monitoring carried out at random on data provided by more than 15% of participating centres. A total of 34,100 cycles were analysed in 2018 (21,467 AI-C cycles and 12,633 AI-D cycles) and 32,548 cycles in 2019 (18,948 AI-C and 13,564 AI-D cycles).

Results. No significant differences were observed in the overall gestation rate per cycle, either for AI-C (2018: 13.1%; 2019: 12.8%) or for AI-D (2018: 19.0%; 2019: 18.8%). In 2018, 11.6% of the pregnancies obtained through AI-C were multiple pregnancies. Similar figures of 9.9% were obtained in 2019. Similar results have been observed in AI-D, where the multiple gestation rate was 10.7% in 2018 and 8.9% in 2019. In pregnancies obtained with AI-C, 17.8% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 16.3% in 2019. With the donor technique, 18.0% resulted in miscarriage in 2018 and 18.0% in 2019.

Conclusions. Despite a slight increase in the number of participating centres, a decrease is observed in the use of AI-C, but this trend does not occur with AI-D.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended embryo culture up to 14 days Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation Efecto de la abstinencia sexual masculina en los resultados reproductivos Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: A new era in human sperm selection Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el laboratorio de reproducción asistida. Trabajo de revisión
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1