权力在利用自然的不同价值实现变革中的作用

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101352
Paola Arias-Arévalo , Elena Lazos-Chavero , Ana S Monroy-Sais , Sara H Nelson , Agnieszka Pawlowska-Mainville , Arild Vatn , Mariana Cantú-Fernández , Ranjini Murali , Barbara Muraca , Unai Pascual
{"title":"权力在利用自然的不同价值实现变革中的作用","authors":"Paola Arias-Arévalo ,&nbsp;Elena Lazos-Chavero ,&nbsp;Ana S Monroy-Sais ,&nbsp;Sara H Nelson ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Pawlowska-Mainville ,&nbsp;Arild Vatn ,&nbsp;Mariana Cantú-Fernández ,&nbsp;Ranjini Murali ,&nbsp;Barbara Muraca ,&nbsp;Unai Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transformative changes toward sustainability are political because the aim, the ‘how’, and the speed of such transformations are constantly disputed across diverse actors with varying degrees of power and operational scales. A key political question of transformative changes is which (and whose) human-nature relationships and values are legitimized for/against sustainability and justice. In this context, we aim to analyze how power dimensions can operate in a values-based approach toward the transformative changes required to address the current nature crisis. We analyzed how structural power — that involves rule-making and operational power — and discursive power — that involves framing power — may challenge or catalyze value-centered leverage points upon which society can act toward designing just and sustainable futures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101352"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of power in leveraging the diverse values of nature for transformative change\",\"authors\":\"Paola Arias-Arévalo ,&nbsp;Elena Lazos-Chavero ,&nbsp;Ana S Monroy-Sais ,&nbsp;Sara H Nelson ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Pawlowska-Mainville ,&nbsp;Arild Vatn ,&nbsp;Mariana Cantú-Fernández ,&nbsp;Ranjini Murali ,&nbsp;Barbara Muraca ,&nbsp;Unai Pascual\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Transformative changes toward sustainability are political because the aim, the ‘how’, and the speed of such transformations are constantly disputed across diverse actors with varying degrees of power and operational scales. A key political question of transformative changes is which (and whose) human-nature relationships and values are legitimized for/against sustainability and justice. In this context, we aim to analyze how power dimensions can operate in a values-based approach toward the transformative changes required to address the current nature crisis. We analyzed how structural power — that involves rule-making and operational power — and discursive power — that involves framing power — may challenge or catalyze value-centered leverage points upon which society can act toward designing just and sustainable futures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000994\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

向可持续发展的转型变化是政治性的,因为这种转变的目标、“如何”和速度在不同程度的权力和操作规模的不同参与者之间不断存在争议。转型变革的一个关键政治问题是,哪种(以及谁的)人与自然的关系和价值观是合法的,有利于/反对可持续性和正义。在此背景下,我们的目标是分析权力维度如何在以价值观为基础的方法中发挥作用,以应对当前自然危机所需的变革。我们分析了结构权力(包括规则制定和操作权力)和话语权力(包括框架权力)如何挑战或催化以价值为中心的杠杆点,在这些杠杆点上,社会可以采取行动,设计公正和可持续的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of power in leveraging the diverse values of nature for transformative change

Transformative changes toward sustainability are political because the aim, the ‘how’, and the speed of such transformations are constantly disputed across diverse actors with varying degrees of power and operational scales. A key political question of transformative changes is which (and whose) human-nature relationships and values are legitimized for/against sustainability and justice. In this context, we aim to analyze how power dimensions can operate in a values-based approach toward the transformative changes required to address the current nature crisis. We analyzed how structural power — that involves rule-making and operational power — and discursive power — that involves framing power — may challenge or catalyze value-centered leverage points upon which society can act toward designing just and sustainable futures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
The potential of social innovation to shift the limits to climate adaptation Greening container terminals through optimization: a systematic review on recent advances Advancing sustainable port development in the Western Indian Ocean region Adaptation constraints, limits and enabling conditions in small island developing states Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1