微积分入门课程中学生期望值动机信念短期轨迹的预测因子

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Contemporary Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102236
Patrick N. Beymer , Emily Q. Rosenzweig
{"title":"微积分入门课程中学生期望值动机信念短期轨迹的预测因子","authors":"Patrick N. Beymer ,&nbsp;Emily Q. Rosenzweig","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, we examined the rate of change among college students’ (<em>N</em> = 429) competence beliefs, interest value, importance value, and four facets of cost measured weekly across a semester of two introductory calculus courses. We also examined how baseline levels of expectancy-value motivational beliefs predicted initial levels and rates of change in weekly expectancy-value beliefs. Results suggested that competence-related beliefs, interest value, and importance value decreased weekly throughout the semester, whereas outside effort and loss of valued alternatives cost increased. Additionally, baseline levels of each task-value-related construct predicted initial weekly levels of their respective constructs, but did not generally predict changes in task values over time. Conversely, baseline competence-related beliefs predicted slower declines in weekly competence-related beliefs, as well as slower declines in importance value and slower increases in outside effort cost, loss of valued alternatives cost, and emotional cost. Finally, baseline importance value predicted larger increases in weekly cost beliefs for all four dimensions of cost that were examined. Together, findings point to the importance of providing early course supports to buffer students against motivational challenges that threaten course participation and performance. Findings also suggest that students’ initial levels of competence-related beliefs are an important buffer against introductory course motivation declining across a semester, whereas initial importance value may have both positive and negative motivational consequences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of short-term trajectories of students’ expectancy-value motivational beliefs in introductory calculus courses\",\"authors\":\"Patrick N. Beymer ,&nbsp;Emily Q. Rosenzweig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the present study, we examined the rate of change among college students’ (<em>N</em> = 429) competence beliefs, interest value, importance value, and four facets of cost measured weekly across a semester of two introductory calculus courses. We also examined how baseline levels of expectancy-value motivational beliefs predicted initial levels and rates of change in weekly expectancy-value beliefs. Results suggested that competence-related beliefs, interest value, and importance value decreased weekly throughout the semester, whereas outside effort and loss of valued alternatives cost increased. Additionally, baseline levels of each task-value-related construct predicted initial weekly levels of their respective constructs, but did not generally predict changes in task values over time. Conversely, baseline competence-related beliefs predicted slower declines in weekly competence-related beliefs, as well as slower declines in importance value and slower increases in outside effort cost, loss of valued alternatives cost, and emotional cost. Finally, baseline importance value predicted larger increases in weekly cost beliefs for all four dimensions of cost that were examined. Together, findings point to the importance of providing early course supports to buffer students against motivational challenges that threaten course participation and performance. Findings also suggest that students’ initial levels of competence-related beliefs are an important buffer against introductory course motivation declining across a semester, whereas initial importance value may have both positive and negative motivational consequences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000905\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000905","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,我们研究了大学生(N = 429)在一个学期的两门微积分入门课程中,能力信念、兴趣价值、重要性价值和四个成本方面的变化率。我们还研究了期望值动机信念的基线水平如何预测每周期望值信念的初始水平和变化率。结果表明,在整个学期中,与能力相关的信念、兴趣价值和重要性价值每周都在下降,而外部努力和有价值的替代成本的损失则在增加。此外,每个任务值相关构式的基线水平预测了其各自构式的初始每周水平,但通常不能预测任务值随时间的变化。相反,基线能力相关信念预测了每周能力相关信念的较慢下降,以及重要性值的较慢下降和外部努力成本、有价值的替代成本和情感成本的较慢增加。最后,基线重要性值预测了被检查的所有四个成本维度的每周成本信念的较大增长。总之,研究结果指出了提供早期课程支持的重要性,以缓冲学生对威胁课程参与和表现的动机挑战的影响。研究结果还表明,学生的初始能力相关信念水平是防止整个学期入门课程动机下降的重要缓冲,而初始重要性值可能同时具有积极和消极的动机后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of short-term trajectories of students’ expectancy-value motivational beliefs in introductory calculus courses

In the present study, we examined the rate of change among college students’ (N = 429) competence beliefs, interest value, importance value, and four facets of cost measured weekly across a semester of two introductory calculus courses. We also examined how baseline levels of expectancy-value motivational beliefs predicted initial levels and rates of change in weekly expectancy-value beliefs. Results suggested that competence-related beliefs, interest value, and importance value decreased weekly throughout the semester, whereas outside effort and loss of valued alternatives cost increased. Additionally, baseline levels of each task-value-related construct predicted initial weekly levels of their respective constructs, but did not generally predict changes in task values over time. Conversely, baseline competence-related beliefs predicted slower declines in weekly competence-related beliefs, as well as slower declines in importance value and slower increases in outside effort cost, loss of valued alternatives cost, and emotional cost. Finally, baseline importance value predicted larger increases in weekly cost beliefs for all four dimensions of cost that were examined. Together, findings point to the importance of providing early course supports to buffer students against motivational challenges that threaten course participation and performance. Findings also suggest that students’ initial levels of competence-related beliefs are an important buffer against introductory course motivation declining across a semester, whereas initial importance value may have both positive and negative motivational consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Methodological and theoretical guidance: Moving educational psychology towards anti-racist bodies of knowledge Writing quality from different latent profiles of revision subprocesses in upper-primary students Using an observational measure of elementary teachers’ emotional expressions during mathematics and English language arts to explore associations with students’ content area emotions and engagement Racialized reprimands: A mobile eye-tracking study on teachers’ responses to students’ norm-violating behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1