是什么导致了tips -国库券的错误定价?

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101438
Jungkyu Ahn , Yongkil Ahn
{"title":"是什么导致了tips -国库券的错误定价?","authors":"Jungkyu Ahn ,&nbsp;Yongkil Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inflation-swapped Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are usually undervalued compared to cash flow-matched Treasury bonds. From 2005 to 2022, TIPS discounts are persistent, averaging approximately 3.18 % of the face value, with a peak of 16.10 %. We elucidate the factors associated with this persistent mispricing and the extent of this association. The results from feature selection techniques and the variable importance-in-projection method reveal that marking-to-market concerns and intermediation frictions are key to understanding the underpricing of TIPS relative to comparable nominal Treasury securities. We conclude that when strategic concerns overwhelm fundamental analysis, asset prices could deviate from fundamental values over a prolonged period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives the TIPS–Treasury bond mispricing?\",\"authors\":\"Jungkyu Ahn ,&nbsp;Yongkil Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Inflation-swapped Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are usually undervalued compared to cash flow-matched Treasury bonds. From 2005 to 2022, TIPS discounts are persistent, averaging approximately 3.18 % of the face value, with a peak of 16.10 %. We elucidate the factors associated with this persistent mispricing and the extent of this association. The results from feature selection techniques and the variable importance-in-projection method reveal that marking-to-market concerns and intermediation frictions are key to understanding the underpricing of TIPS relative to comparable nominal Treasury securities. We conclude that when strategic concerns overwhelm fundamental analysis, asset prices could deviate from fundamental values over a prolonged period.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539823001056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539823001056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与现金流匹配的国债相比,通货膨胀保值债券(TIPS)通常被低估。从2005年到2022年,TIPS的折扣持续存在,平均约为票面价值的3.18%,峰值为16.10%。我们阐明了与这种持续错误定价相关的因素以及这种关联的程度。特征选择技术和预测中变量重要性方法的结果表明,对按市场计价的担忧和中介摩擦是理解TIPS相对于可比名义国库券定价过低的关键。我们的结论是,当战略考虑压倒基本面分析时,资产价格可能会在很长一段时间内偏离基本面价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What drives the TIPS–Treasury bond mispricing?

Inflation-swapped Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are usually undervalued compared to cash flow-matched Treasury bonds. From 2005 to 2022, TIPS discounts are persistent, averaging approximately 3.18 % of the face value, with a peak of 16.10 %. We elucidate the factors associated with this persistent mispricing and the extent of this association. The results from feature selection techniques and the variable importance-in-projection method reveal that marking-to-market concerns and intermediation frictions are key to understanding the underpricing of TIPS relative to comparable nominal Treasury securities. We conclude that when strategic concerns overwhelm fundamental analysis, asset prices could deviate from fundamental values over a prolonged period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
High-frequency realized stochastic volatility model Jump tail risk exposure and the cross-section of stock returns Time-varying variance decomposition of macro-finance term structure models Technological shocks and stock market volatility over a century Is firm-level political risk priced in the corporate bond market?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1