20世纪90年代的生产率增长:技术、利用还是调整?

Susanto Basu, John G. Fernald, Matthew D. Shapiro
{"title":"20世纪90年代的生产率增长:技术、利用还是调整?","authors":"Susanto Basu,&nbsp;John G. Fernald,&nbsp;Matthew D. Shapiro","doi":"10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00054-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measured productivity growth increased substantially during the second half of the 1990s. This paper examines whether this increase owes to an increase in the rate of technological change or whether it can be explained by non-technological factors relating to factor utilization, factor accumulation, or returns to scale. It finds that the recent increase in productivity growth does appear to arise from an increase in technological change. Cyclical utilization raised measured productivity growth relative to technology growth in the first part of the expansion, but lowered it subsequently. Factor adjustment leads to a steady-state understatement of technology growth by measured productivity growth. The understatement was greater in the second half of the expansion than the first. Changes in the distribution of inputs across industries with different returns to scale lead to a modest understatement in the growth in technology. Although the increase technological change is most pronounced in durable manufacturing, technological change also increased outside of manufacturing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100218,"journal":{"name":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 117-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00054-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment?\",\"authors\":\"Susanto Basu,&nbsp;John G. Fernald,&nbsp;Matthew D. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00054-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Measured productivity growth increased substantially during the second half of the 1990s. This paper examines whether this increase owes to an increase in the rate of technological change or whether it can be explained by non-technological factors relating to factor utilization, factor accumulation, or returns to scale. It finds that the recent increase in productivity growth does appear to arise from an increase in technological change. Cyclical utilization raised measured productivity growth relative to technology growth in the first part of the expansion, but lowered it subsequently. Factor adjustment leads to a steady-state understatement of technology growth by measured productivity growth. The understatement was greater in the second half of the expansion than the first. Changes in the distribution of inputs across industries with different returns to scale lead to a modest understatement in the growth in technology. Although the increase technological change is most pronounced in durable manufacturing, technological change also increased outside of manufacturing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 117-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0167-2231(01)00054-9\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223101000549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223101000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪90年代后半期,测量的生产率增长大幅增加。本文考察了这种增长是由于技术变革速度的提高,还是可以用与要素利用、要素积累或规模回报相关的非技术因素来解释。它发现,最近生产率增长的增加似乎确实源于技术变革的增加。在经济扩张的第一部分,周期性利用提高了相对于技术增长的测量生产率增长,但随后又降低了它。要素调整导致通过测量的生产率增长对技术增长的稳态低估。经济扩张的后半段比前半段更为轻描淡写。具有不同规模回报的行业之间投入分配的变化导致技术增长的适度低估。尽管技术变革的增长在耐用制造业最为明显,但制造业以外的技术变革也在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment?

Measured productivity growth increased substantially during the second half of the 1990s. This paper examines whether this increase owes to an increase in the rate of technological change or whether it can be explained by non-technological factors relating to factor utilization, factor accumulation, or returns to scale. It finds that the recent increase in productivity growth does appear to arise from an increase in technological change. Cyclical utilization raised measured productivity growth relative to technology growth in the first part of the expansion, but lowered it subsequently. Factor adjustment leads to a steady-state understatement of technology growth by measured productivity growth. The understatement was greater in the second half of the expansion than the first. Changes in the distribution of inputs across industries with different returns to scale lead to a modest understatement in the growth in technology. Although the increase technological change is most pronounced in durable manufacturing, technological change also increased outside of manufacturing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A quantitative model of the British industrial revolution, 1780–1850 a comment Searching for prosperity a comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence A comment Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence Deunionization, technical change, and inequality A comment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1