从不同哺乳动物中纯化的血管紧张素i转化酶的理化和免疫学比较

Bénédicte Bénéteau-Burnat , Abdelkrim Tahraoui , Frédéric Barbut , Jacqueline Giboudeau , Bruno Baudin
{"title":"从不同哺乳动物中纯化的血管紧张素i转化酶的理化和免疫学比较","authors":"Bénédicte Bénéteau-Burnat ,&nbsp;Abdelkrim Tahraoui ,&nbsp;Frédéric Barbut ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Giboudeau ,&nbsp;Bruno Baudin","doi":"10.1016/0305-0491(94)90125-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) was purified from lungs of pig, rat, monkey and human for comparison of its physicochemical, enzymatic and immunological properties. The protocol involved three chromatographic steps after detergent extraction, i.e. DEAE–Sphérodex ion exchange, lisinopril–Sepharose affinity and Superose 12 HPLC, plus Mono-Q HPLC for monkey ACE. Purified ACE's presented numerous homologies: in particular, closely similar specific activities, catalytic efficiencies, <em>K</em><sub>m</sub>'s, optimal pH and chloride activations; the molecular weights were about 170 kDa by SDS-PAGE and 320 kDa by gel-filtration on Superose 12; the isoelectric points were about 4.5–4.7. Specific polyclonal antibodies recognized the antigen (porcine ACE) as well as rat, monkey and human ACEs. In contrast, three monoclonal antibodies (F02.4.1, F01.1.3 and F03) produced against porcine ACE showed some differences: they only reacted with pig enzyme and only one (F02.4.1) was anticatalytic. Moreover, the cross-reactivity judged on ELISA with porcine ACE characterized different epitopes specific for the porcine enzyme. In particular, the binding of F02.4.1 was not diminished by previous treatment with saturating concentrations of synthetic competitive ACE inhibitors. Thus, the extrapolation to human of data obtained on animal models should be possible at least for pharmacological and medical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100294,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry","volume":"109 4","pages":"Pages 623-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0305-0491(94)90125-2","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicochemical and immunological comparisons between angiotensin I-converting enzymes purified from different mammalian species\",\"authors\":\"Bénédicte Bénéteau-Burnat ,&nbsp;Abdelkrim Tahraoui ,&nbsp;Frédéric Barbut ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Giboudeau ,&nbsp;Bruno Baudin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0305-0491(94)90125-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) was purified from lungs of pig, rat, monkey and human for comparison of its physicochemical, enzymatic and immunological properties. The protocol involved three chromatographic steps after detergent extraction, i.e. DEAE–Sphérodex ion exchange, lisinopril–Sepharose affinity and Superose 12 HPLC, plus Mono-Q HPLC for monkey ACE. Purified ACE's presented numerous homologies: in particular, closely similar specific activities, catalytic efficiencies, <em>K</em><sub>m</sub>'s, optimal pH and chloride activations; the molecular weights were about 170 kDa by SDS-PAGE and 320 kDa by gel-filtration on Superose 12; the isoelectric points were about 4.5–4.7. Specific polyclonal antibodies recognized the antigen (porcine ACE) as well as rat, monkey and human ACEs. In contrast, three monoclonal antibodies (F02.4.1, F01.1.3 and F03) produced against porcine ACE showed some differences: they only reacted with pig enzyme and only one (F02.4.1) was anticatalytic. Moreover, the cross-reactivity judged on ELISA with porcine ACE characterized different epitopes specific for the porcine enzyme. In particular, the binding of F02.4.1 was not diminished by previous treatment with saturating concentrations of synthetic competitive ACE inhibitors. Thus, the extrapolation to human of data obtained on animal models should be possible at least for pharmacological and medical trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"109 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 623-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0305-0491(94)90125-2\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305049194901252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305049194901252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

从猪、大鼠、猴和人的肺中纯化血管紧张素i转换酶(ACE),比较其理化、酶学和免疫学特性。该方案包括洗涤剂提取后的三个色谱步骤,即deae - sphsamrodex离子交换,赖诺普利- sepharose亲和和Superose 12 HPLC,以及猴子ACE的Mono-Q HPLC。纯化后的ACE具有许多同源性:特别是,非常相似的比活性,催化效率,Km,最佳pH和氯化物活化;SDS-PAGE测定分子量为170 kDa, Superose - 12凝胶过滤分子量为320 kDa;等电点在4.5 ~ 4.7之间。特异性多克隆抗体识别抗原(猪ACE)以及大鼠、猴和人ACE。相比之下,3种针对猪ACE的单克隆抗体(F02.4.1、F01.1.3和F03)表现出一定的差异:它们只与猪酶反应,只有1种(F02.4.1)具有抗催化作用。此外,ELISA检测的猪ACE交叉反应性表明,该酶具有不同的特异性表位。特别是,F02.4.1的结合并没有因为之前使用饱和浓度的合成竞争性ACE抑制剂而减弱。因此,至少在药理学和医学试验中,从动物模型上获得的数据应该可以外推到人类身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physicochemical and immunological comparisons between angiotensin I-converting enzymes purified from different mammalian species

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) was purified from lungs of pig, rat, monkey and human for comparison of its physicochemical, enzymatic and immunological properties. The protocol involved three chromatographic steps after detergent extraction, i.e. DEAE–Sphérodex ion exchange, lisinopril–Sepharose affinity and Superose 12 HPLC, plus Mono-Q HPLC for monkey ACE. Purified ACE's presented numerous homologies: in particular, closely similar specific activities, catalytic efficiencies, Km's, optimal pH and chloride activations; the molecular weights were about 170 kDa by SDS-PAGE and 320 kDa by gel-filtration on Superose 12; the isoelectric points were about 4.5–4.7. Specific polyclonal antibodies recognized the antigen (porcine ACE) as well as rat, monkey and human ACEs. In contrast, three monoclonal antibodies (F02.4.1, F01.1.3 and F03) produced against porcine ACE showed some differences: they only reacted with pig enzyme and only one (F02.4.1) was anticatalytic. Moreover, the cross-reactivity judged on ELISA with porcine ACE characterized different epitopes specific for the porcine enzyme. In particular, the binding of F02.4.1 was not diminished by previous treatment with saturating concentrations of synthetic competitive ACE inhibitors. Thus, the extrapolation to human of data obtained on animal models should be possible at least for pharmacological and medical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Announcement Erratum Characterization of liver flavin-containing monooxygenase of the dogfish shark (Squalus acanthias) and partial purification of liver flavin-containing monooxygenase of the silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) Lipid composition of liver peroxisomes isolated from untreated and clofibrate-treated mice and rats Glutamine and glucose metabolism in intraepithelial lymphocytes from pre- and post-weaning pigs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1