Luara Medianeira de Lima Schlösser, Cristina Tonial Simões, Janine Alves Sarturi, Cristiane Rosa da Silva, Isadora Fabris Laber, Dison Stracke Pfingsten Franco, Carlos Augusto Mallmann
{"title":"不同抗霉菌毒素添加剂:膨润土、斜发沸石和酵母细胞壁提取的葡聚糖对黄曲霉毒素B1的吸附。","authors":"Luara Medianeira de Lima Schlösser, Cristina Tonial Simões, Janine Alves Sarturi, Cristiane Rosa da Silva, Isadora Fabris Laber, Dison Stracke Pfingsten Franco, Carlos Augusto Mallmann","doi":"10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aims to evaluate and compare antimycotoxin additives (AMAs) composed of bentonite (AMA 1), clinoptilolite (AMA 2), and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall (AMA 3), with respect to their ability to bind Aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> (AFB<sub>1</sub>) using the isothermal models of Freundlich, Langmuir, and BET. The additives were submitted to an in vitro adsorption experiment with AFB<sub>1</sub> (0.05-4 mg L<sup>-1</sup>), using solutions of pH 3 and pH 6, with an inclusion rate of 0.5%, and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. At pH 3, for the seven concentrations evaluated, AMA 1 obtained adsorption rates (99.69 to 99.98%) higher (p < 0. 05) than the other AMAs, which were from 82.97 to 88.72% (AMA 2) and from 79.43 to 89.32% (AMA 3). At pH 6, in concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L<sup>-1</sup> of AFB<sub>1</sub>, AMA 1 obtained higher (p < 0.05) adsorption results (97.86 to 99.86%) than AMA 2 (91.98 to 96.12%) and AMA 3 (87.56 to 93.50%). The Freundlich model best fitted the AMA 1 adsorption data. For the other additives, the Langmuir model obtained the best fit, demonstrating q<sub>m</sub> of 8.6 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6 for AMA 2; and for AMA 3, with q<sub>m</sub> of 3.4 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6. The isotherm models work as an effective tool to describe the adsorption process whereas the AMA adsorption capacity varies as a function of product composition, pH, and mycotoxin content.</p>","PeriodicalId":19060,"journal":{"name":"Mycotoxin Research","volume":" ","pages":"111-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adsorption of aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> by different antimycotoxin additives: bentonite, clinoptilolite, and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall.\",\"authors\":\"Luara Medianeira de Lima Schlösser, Cristina Tonial Simões, Janine Alves Sarturi, Cristiane Rosa da Silva, Isadora Fabris Laber, Dison Stracke Pfingsten Franco, Carlos Augusto Mallmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study aims to evaluate and compare antimycotoxin additives (AMAs) composed of bentonite (AMA 1), clinoptilolite (AMA 2), and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall (AMA 3), with respect to their ability to bind Aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> (AFB<sub>1</sub>) using the isothermal models of Freundlich, Langmuir, and BET. The additives were submitted to an in vitro adsorption experiment with AFB<sub>1</sub> (0.05-4 mg L<sup>-1</sup>), using solutions of pH 3 and pH 6, with an inclusion rate of 0.5%, and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. At pH 3, for the seven concentrations evaluated, AMA 1 obtained adsorption rates (99.69 to 99.98%) higher (p < 0. 05) than the other AMAs, which were from 82.97 to 88.72% (AMA 2) and from 79.43 to 89.32% (AMA 3). At pH 6, in concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L<sup>-1</sup> of AFB<sub>1</sub>, AMA 1 obtained higher (p < 0.05) adsorption results (97.86 to 99.86%) than AMA 2 (91.98 to 96.12%) and AMA 3 (87.56 to 93.50%). The Freundlich model best fitted the AMA 1 adsorption data. For the other additives, the Langmuir model obtained the best fit, demonstrating q<sub>m</sub> of 8.6 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6 for AMA 2; and for AMA 3, with q<sub>m</sub> of 3.4 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6. The isotherm models work as an effective tool to describe the adsorption process whereas the AMA adsorption capacity varies as a function of product composition, pH, and mycotoxin content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycotoxin Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"111-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycotoxin Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycotoxin Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adsorption of aflatoxin B1 by different antimycotoxin additives: bentonite, clinoptilolite, and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall.
The present study aims to evaluate and compare antimycotoxin additives (AMAs) composed of bentonite (AMA 1), clinoptilolite (AMA 2), and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall (AMA 3), with respect to their ability to bind Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) using the isothermal models of Freundlich, Langmuir, and BET. The additives were submitted to an in vitro adsorption experiment with AFB1 (0.05-4 mg L-1), using solutions of pH 3 and pH 6, with an inclusion rate of 0.5%, and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. At pH 3, for the seven concentrations evaluated, AMA 1 obtained adsorption rates (99.69 to 99.98%) higher (p < 0. 05) than the other AMAs, which were from 82.97 to 88.72% (AMA 2) and from 79.43 to 89.32% (AMA 3). At pH 6, in concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L-1 of AFB1, AMA 1 obtained higher (p < 0.05) adsorption results (97.86 to 99.86%) than AMA 2 (91.98 to 96.12%) and AMA 3 (87.56 to 93.50%). The Freundlich model best fitted the AMA 1 adsorption data. For the other additives, the Langmuir model obtained the best fit, demonstrating qm of 8.6 mg g-1 at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g-1 at pH 6 for AMA 2; and for AMA 3, with qm of 3.4 mg g-1 at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g-1 at pH 6. The isotherm models work as an effective tool to describe the adsorption process whereas the AMA adsorption capacity varies as a function of product composition, pH, and mycotoxin content.
期刊介绍:
Mycotoxin Research, the official publication of the Society for Mycotoxin Research, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal dealing with all aspects related to toxic fungal metabolites. The journal publishes original research articles and reviews in all areas dealing with mycotoxins. As an interdisciplinary platform, Mycotoxin Research welcomes submission of scientific contributions in the following research fields:
- Ecology and genetics of mycotoxin formation
- Mode of action of mycotoxins, metabolism and toxicology
- Agricultural production and mycotoxins
- Human and animal health aspects, including exposure studies and risk assessment
- Food and feed safety, including occurrence, prevention, regulatory aspects, and control of mycotoxins
- Environmental safety and technology-related aspects of mycotoxins
- Chemistry, synthesis and analysis.