利用移动设备和单镜摄影测量技术进行眼眶缺损数字印痕和三维打印模型的体外研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.22-0461
Kosei Tabira, Riho Kawaguchi, Yuichi Mine, Shogo Iwaguro, Tzu-Yu Peng, Yumi Tsuchida, Yukihiro Takayama, Shota Okazaki, Tsuyoshi Taji, Takeshi Murayama
{"title":"利用移动设备和单镜摄影测量技术进行眼眶缺损数字印痕和三维打印模型的体外研究。","authors":"Kosei Tabira,&nbsp;Riho Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Yuichi Mine,&nbsp;Shogo Iwaguro,&nbsp;Tzu-Yu Peng,&nbsp;Yumi Tsuchida,&nbsp;Yukihiro Takayama,&nbsp;Shota Okazaki,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Taji,&nbsp;Takeshi Murayama","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.22-0461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to perform an in vitro evaluation of digital impressions using a mobile device and monoscopic photogrammetry in cases of orbital defects with undercuts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three 10-mm-square cubes were attached to a diagnostic cast of a patient with a right orbital defect. Still images acquired with a mobile device were used to generate facial three-dimensional (3D) data. Two types of still images were used: one was a whole face image, and the other was a defect site-focused image. For comparison, an extraoral scanner was used to obtain facial 3D data. Five dental technicians fabricated 3D printed models using additive manufacturing and measured the distances between the measurement points using a digital caliper. The discrepancy between the distances measured on the diagnostic cast of the patient and the 3D printed model was calculated. Friedman test was used to analyze the discrepancy, and the Bonferroni test was used to verify the differences between the pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical significance was found with respect to the type of 3D model fabrication method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results suggested that the workflow can be applied to digital impressions of the maxillofacial region.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry.\",\"authors\":\"Kosei Tabira,&nbsp;Riho Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Yuichi Mine,&nbsp;Shogo Iwaguro,&nbsp;Tzu-Yu Peng,&nbsp;Yumi Tsuchida,&nbsp;Yukihiro Takayama,&nbsp;Shota Okazaki,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Taji,&nbsp;Takeshi Murayama\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd.22-0461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to perform an in vitro evaluation of digital impressions using a mobile device and monoscopic photogrammetry in cases of orbital defects with undercuts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three 10-mm-square cubes were attached to a diagnostic cast of a patient with a right orbital defect. Still images acquired with a mobile device were used to generate facial three-dimensional (3D) data. Two types of still images were used: one was a whole face image, and the other was a defect site-focused image. For comparison, an extraoral scanner was used to obtain facial 3D data. Five dental technicians fabricated 3D printed models using additive manufacturing and measured the distances between the measurement points using a digital caliper. The discrepancy between the distances measured on the diagnostic cast of the patient and the 3D printed model was calculated. Friedman test was used to analyze the discrepancy, and the Bonferroni test was used to verify the differences between the pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical significance was found with respect to the type of 3D model fabrication method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results suggested that the workflow can be applied to digital impressions of the maxillofacial region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是使用移动设备和单镜摄影测量法在眼眶缺损伴切口的情况下进行数字印模的体外评估。方法:将3个10毫米见方的立方体附着于右眼眶缺损患者的诊断型石膏上。使用移动设备获取的静止图像生成面部三维(3D)数据。使用了两种类型的静态图像:一种是整张脸的图像,另一种是缺陷部位的图像。为了进行比较,使用口外扫描仪获得面部3D数据。五名牙科技术人员使用增材制造制造3D打印模型,并使用数字卡尺测量测量点之间的距离。计算患者诊断模型上测量的距离与3D打印模型之间的差异。采用Friedman检验对差异进行分析,采用Bonferroni检验对差异进行验证。结果:三维模型制作方法的类型有统计学意义。结论:在这项体外研究的局限性内,结果表明该工作流程可以应用于颌面区域的数字印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform an in vitro evaluation of digital impressions using a mobile device and monoscopic photogrammetry in cases of orbital defects with undercuts.

Methods: Three 10-mm-square cubes were attached to a diagnostic cast of a patient with a right orbital defect. Still images acquired with a mobile device were used to generate facial three-dimensional (3D) data. Two types of still images were used: one was a whole face image, and the other was a defect site-focused image. For comparison, an extraoral scanner was used to obtain facial 3D data. Five dental technicians fabricated 3D printed models using additive manufacturing and measured the distances between the measurement points using a digital caliper. The discrepancy between the distances measured on the diagnostic cast of the patient and the 3D printed model was calculated. Friedman test was used to analyze the discrepancy, and the Bonferroni test was used to verify the differences between the pairs.

Results: Statistical significance was found with respect to the type of 3D model fabrication method.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results suggested that the workflow can be applied to digital impressions of the maxillofacial region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary first molar accessory root canal morphology in a Black South African subpopulation. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CAD-CAM for removable partial denture fabrication after marginal mandibulectomy based on a well-adjusted pre-existing denture. Assessment of cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like differentiation, shear bond strength, and microhardness of four orthodontic adhesive composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1