急性结石性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术后发病率和死亡率的预测:s.p.ri m.a.c.c的结果。研究。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE World Journal of Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2023-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6
Paola Fugazzola, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Marcello Di Martino, Matteo Tomasoni, Francesca Dal Mas, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Vanni Agnoletti, Marco Ceresoli, Federico Coccolini, Salomone Di Saverio, Tommaso Dominioni, Camilla Nikita Farè, Simone Frassini, Giulia Gambini, Ari Leppäniemi, Marcello Maestri, Elena Martín-Pérez, Ernest E Moore, Valeria Musella, Andrew B Peitzman, Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez, Benedetta Sargenti, Massimo Sartelli, Jacopo Viganò, Andrea Anderloni, Walter Biffl, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni
{"title":"急性结石性胆囊炎早期胆囊切除术后发病率和死亡率的预测:s.p.ri m.a.c.c的结果。研究。","authors":"Paola Fugazzola,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cobianchi,&nbsp;Marcello Di Martino,&nbsp;Matteo Tomasoni,&nbsp;Francesca Dal Mas,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Tommaso Dominioni,&nbsp;Camilla Nikita Farè,&nbsp;Simone Frassini,&nbsp;Giulia Gambini,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Marcello Maestri,&nbsp;Elena Martín-Pérez,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Valeria Musella,&nbsp;Andrew B Peitzman,&nbsp;Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez,&nbsp;Benedetta Sargenti,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Jacopo Viganò,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024826/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Fugazzola,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cobianchi,&nbsp;Marcello Di Martino,&nbsp;Matteo Tomasoni,&nbsp;Francesca Dal Mas,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Tommaso Dominioni,&nbsp;Camilla Nikita Farè,&nbsp;Simone Frassini,&nbsp;Giulia Gambini,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Marcello Maestri,&nbsp;Elena Martín-Pérez,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Valeria Musella,&nbsp;Andrew B Peitzman,&nbsp;Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez,&nbsp;Benedetta Sargenti,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Jacopo Viganò,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10024826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00488-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:近年来,早期胆囊切除术(EC)治疗急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的创伤性较小的选择越来越多。我们仍然缺乏一种可靠的工具来选择高危患者,他们可以从这些替代方案中受益。我们的研究旨在前瞻性地验证与其他术前风险预测模型相比,胆管风险评分在预测ACC行EC患者术后并发症方面的作用。方法:spri . m.a.c.c。该研究是世界急诊外科学会的一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。从2021年9月1日至2022年9月1日,纳入了79个中心连续收治的1253例患者。纳入标准为诊断为ACC并为EC的候选者。对趋势进行Cochran-Armitage检验,以确定胆危险评分与复杂的术后过程之间是否存在线性相关性。为了评估所分析的预测模型- possum生理评分(PS)、修正虚弱指数、Charlson合并症指数、美国麻醉医师学会评分(ASA)、APACHE II评分和ACC严重程度分级-的准确性,生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。采用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)比较诊断能力。结果:30天主要发病率为6.6%,30天死亡率为1.1%。结论:胆囊风险评分经外部验证,但CHOLE-POSSUM评分是更为准确的预测模型。CHOLE-POSSUM是一种可靠的工具,可将ACC患者分为低风险组(可能是安全的EC候选者)和高风险组(新的微创内镜技术可能在其中找到最有用的作用领域)。试验注册:ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of morbidity and mortality after early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: results of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study.

Background: Less invasive alternatives than early cholecystectomy (EC) for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) treatment have been spreading in recent years. We still lack a reliable tool to select high-risk patients who could benefit from these alternatives. Our study aimed to prospectively validate the Chole-risk score in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing EC for ACC compared with other preoperative risk prediction models.

Method: The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is a World Society of Emergency Surgery prospective multicenter observational study. From 1st September 2021 to 1st September 2022, 1253 consecutive patients admitted in 79 centers were included. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of ACC and to be a candidate for EC. A Cochran-Armitage test of the trend was run to determine whether a linear correlation existed between the Chole-risk score and a complicated postoperative course. To assess the accuracy of the analyzed prediction models-POSSUM Physiological Score (PS), modified Frailty Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologist score (ASA), APACHE II score, and ACC severity grade-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to compare the diagnostic abilities.

Results: A 30-day major morbidity of 6.6% and 30-day mortality of 1.1% were found. Chole-risk was validated, but POSSUM PS was the best risk prediction model for a complicated course after EC for ACC (in-hospital mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; 30-day mortality: AUC 0.94, p < 0.001; in-hospital major morbidity: AUC 0.73, p < 0.001; 30-day major morbidity: AUC 0.70, p < 0.001). POSSUM PS with a cutoff of 25 (defined in our study as a 'Chole-POSSUM' score) was then validated in a separate cohort of patients. It showed a 100% sensitivity and a 100% negative predictive value for mortality and a 96-97% negative predictive value for major complications.

Conclusions: The Chole-risk score was externally validated, but the CHOLE-POSSUM stands as a more accurate prediction model. CHOLE-POSSUM is a reliable tool to stratify patients with ACC into a low-risk group that may represent a safe EC candidate, and a high-risk group, where new minimally invasive endoscopic techniques may find the most useful field of action.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04995380.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic PICO◊ dressing shortens wound dressing requirements post emergency laparotomy (EL-PICO◊ trial) A new technology for medical and surgical data organisation: the WSES-WJES Decentralised Knowledge Graph Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) Ultra minimally invasive surgical stabilization of Rib fractures (uMI-SSRF): reduction and fixation techniques to minimize the surgical wound Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized controlled trial (SONOCHOL-trial)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1