远程医疗与健康差异:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间患者特征与远程医疗、面对面、电话和基于信息的护理之间的关系

Ling Tong , Ben George , Bradley H. Crotty , Melek Somai , Bradley W. Taylor , Kristen Osinski , Jake Luo
{"title":"远程医疗与健康差异:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间患者特征与远程医疗、面对面、电话和基于信息的护理之间的关系","authors":"Ling Tong ,&nbsp;Ben George ,&nbsp;Bradley H. Crotty ,&nbsp;Melek Somai ,&nbsp;Bradley W. Taylor ,&nbsp;Kristen Osinski ,&nbsp;Jake Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Telemedicine has been an essential form of care since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, telemedicine may exacerbate disparities for populations with limited digital literacy or access, such as older adults, racial minorities, patients of low income, rural residences, or limited English proficiency. From March 2020 to March 2022, this retrospective cohort study analyzed the use of in-person, phone/message, and telemedical care at a single tertiary care center in an oncology department. We investigated the association between economic, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic factors and forms of care, including in-person visits, telemedicine-based visits, and telephone/messages. The study results show that telemedicine utilization is lower among patients 65 and older, female patients, American Indian or Alaska Native patients, uninsured patients, and patients who require interpreters during clinical visits. As a result, it is unlikely that telemedicine will provide equal access to clinical care for all populations. On the other hand, in-person care utilization remains low in low-income and rural-living patients compared to the general population, while telephone and message use remains high in low-income and rural-living patients. We conclude that telemedicine is currently unable to close the utilization gap for populations of low socioeconomic status. Patients with low socioeconomic status use in-person care less frequently. For the disadvantaged, unusually high telephone or message utilization is unlikely to provide the same quality as in-person or telemedical care. Understanding the causes of disparity and promoting a solution to improve equal access to care for all patients is critical.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73507,"journal":{"name":"IPEM-translation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617798/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine and health disparities: Association between patient characteristics and telemedicine, in-person, telephone and message-based care during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Ling Tong ,&nbsp;Ben George ,&nbsp;Bradley H. Crotty ,&nbsp;Melek Somai ,&nbsp;Bradley W. Taylor ,&nbsp;Kristen Osinski ,&nbsp;Jake Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Telemedicine has been an essential form of care since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, telemedicine may exacerbate disparities for populations with limited digital literacy or access, such as older adults, racial minorities, patients of low income, rural residences, or limited English proficiency. From March 2020 to March 2022, this retrospective cohort study analyzed the use of in-person, phone/message, and telemedical care at a single tertiary care center in an oncology department. We investigated the association between economic, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic factors and forms of care, including in-person visits, telemedicine-based visits, and telephone/messages. The study results show that telemedicine utilization is lower among patients 65 and older, female patients, American Indian or Alaska Native patients, uninsured patients, and patients who require interpreters during clinical visits. As a result, it is unlikely that telemedicine will provide equal access to clinical care for all populations. On the other hand, in-person care utilization remains low in low-income and rural-living patients compared to the general population, while telephone and message use remains high in low-income and rural-living patients. We conclude that telemedicine is currently unable to close the utilization gap for populations of low socioeconomic status. Patients with low socioeconomic status use in-person care less frequently. For the disadvantaged, unusually high telephone or message utilization is unlikely to provide the same quality as in-person or telemedical care. Understanding the causes of disparity and promoting a solution to improve equal access to care for all patients is critical.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPEM-translation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPEM-translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258822000073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPEM-translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258822000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

自2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发以来,远程医疗一直是一种重要的医疗形式。然而,远程医疗可能会加剧数字素养或获取途径有限的人群的差距,如老年人、少数民族、低收入患者、农村居民或英语水平有限的人群。从2020年3月到2022年3月,这项回顾性队列研究分析了肿瘤科单一三级护理中心的面对面、电话/短信和远程医疗护理的使用情况。我们调查了经济、种族、民族、社会经济因素与护理形式之间的关系,包括亲自就诊、基于远程医疗的就诊和电话/短信。研究结果显示,65岁及以上患者、女性患者、美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民患者、未参保患者以及在临床就诊时需要口译员的患者中,远程医疗的使用率较低。因此,远程医疗不太可能为所有人群提供平等的临床护理机会。另一方面,与一般人群相比,低收入和农村生活患者的亲自护理使用率仍然很低,而低收入和农村生活患者的电话和短信使用率仍然很高。我们得出结论,远程医疗目前无法缩小低社会经济地位人群的利用差距。社会经济地位低的患者使用面对面护理的频率较低。对于弱势群体来说,异常高的电话或短信使用率不太可能提供与面对面或远程医疗相同的质量。了解造成差距的原因并促进解决方案,以改善所有患者获得平等护理的机会,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedicine and health disparities: Association between patient characteristics and telemedicine, in-person, telephone and message-based care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Telemedicine has been an essential form of care since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, telemedicine may exacerbate disparities for populations with limited digital literacy or access, such as older adults, racial minorities, patients of low income, rural residences, or limited English proficiency. From March 2020 to March 2022, this retrospective cohort study analyzed the use of in-person, phone/message, and telemedical care at a single tertiary care center in an oncology department. We investigated the association between economic, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic factors and forms of care, including in-person visits, telemedicine-based visits, and telephone/messages. The study results show that telemedicine utilization is lower among patients 65 and older, female patients, American Indian or Alaska Native patients, uninsured patients, and patients who require interpreters during clinical visits. As a result, it is unlikely that telemedicine will provide equal access to clinical care for all populations. On the other hand, in-person care utilization remains low in low-income and rural-living patients compared to the general population, while telephone and message use remains high in low-income and rural-living patients. We conclude that telemedicine is currently unable to close the utilization gap for populations of low socioeconomic status. Patients with low socioeconomic status use in-person care less frequently. For the disadvantaged, unusually high telephone or message utilization is unlikely to provide the same quality as in-person or telemedical care. Understanding the causes of disparity and promoting a solution to improve equal access to care for all patients is critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IPEM-translation
IPEM-translation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
63 days
期刊最新文献
National radiotherapy dosimetry audit in the UK – A vision and roadmap A review of the clinical value of mechanical ventilators and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) equipment Experimental measurement of dosimetric parameters relevant to radioactive needlestick injury The use of solar film elements on a neonate manikin surface to estimate the received output power of neonatal phototherapy lamp systems Role of Coriolis flow measurement technology in validation of model of syringe driver performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1