卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)和人类(智人)的空间频率和全局-局部视觉处理。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Comparative Psychology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1037/com0000344
Milena Palumbo, Giovanna Spinozzi, Valentina Truppa, Carlo De Lillo
{"title":"卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)和人类(智人)的空间频率和全局-局部视觉处理。","authors":"Milena Palumbo,&nbsp;Giovanna Spinozzi,&nbsp;Valentina Truppa,&nbsp;Carlo De Lillo","doi":"10.1037/com0000344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments employing an identity matching-to-sample procedure were carried out to clarify the factors affecting global-local visual processing of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in comparison with humans. In the first experiment, we assessed the relative ability of the two species to discriminate high, medium, or low spatial frequencies (HSFs, MSFs, or LSFs). Then, in a second experiment, we determined if the use of a procedure designed to induce a bias toward attending given spatial frequencies could produce a top-down or selection-history modulation of global-local visual processing in capuchins and humans. In the first experiment, monkeys discriminated better HSFs. By contrast, humans discriminated better MSFs and LSFs. The second experiment showed an effect of SF processing on global-local processing in both species. However, this effect was confined to local trials only and occurred under different conditions in the two species. In monkeys, it occurred following a bias toward attending HSFs, whereas in humans, it occurred following a bias toward attending LSFs. These results provide new information about the relative sensitivity of humans and capuchins to different spatial frequencies in vision. Moreover, they suggest that global-local visual processing can be modulated in both humans and monkeys by processes that are not confined to attending one or the other level of stimulus structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial frequency and global-local visual processing in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens).\",\"authors\":\"Milena Palumbo,&nbsp;Giovanna Spinozzi,&nbsp;Valentina Truppa,&nbsp;Carlo De Lillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/com0000344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two experiments employing an identity matching-to-sample procedure were carried out to clarify the factors affecting global-local visual processing of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in comparison with humans. In the first experiment, we assessed the relative ability of the two species to discriminate high, medium, or low spatial frequencies (HSFs, MSFs, or LSFs). Then, in a second experiment, we determined if the use of a procedure designed to induce a bias toward attending given spatial frequencies could produce a top-down or selection-history modulation of global-local visual processing in capuchins and humans. In the first experiment, monkeys discriminated better HSFs. By contrast, humans discriminated better MSFs and LSFs. The second experiment showed an effect of SF processing on global-local processing in both species. However, this effect was confined to local trials only and occurred under different conditions in the two species. In monkeys, it occurred following a bias toward attending HSFs, whereas in humans, it occurred following a bias toward attending LSFs. These results provide new information about the relative sensitivity of humans and capuchins to different spatial frequencies in vision. Moreover, they suggest that global-local visual processing can be modulated in both humans and monkeys by processes that are not confined to attending one or the other level of stimulus structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用身份匹配-样本程序进行了两个实验,以澄清影响卷尾猴(Sapajus spp.)与人类的全局-局部视觉处理的因素。在第一个实验中,我们评估了两个物种区分高、中、低空间频率(hsf、msf或lsf)的相对能力。然后,在第二个实验中,我们确定使用一个程序来诱导对特定空间频率的偏好,是否可以在卷尾猴和人类的全局-局部视觉处理中产生自上而下或选择历史调制。在第一个实验中,猴子能更好地辨别出hsf。相比之下,人类对msf和lsf的辨别能力更强。第二个实验显示了SF加工对两个物种的全局-局部加工的影响。然而,这种效应仅局限于局部试验,并且在两个物种的不同条件下发生。在猴子中,它发生在对参加hsf的偏见之后,而在人类中,它发生在对参加lsf的偏见之后。这些结果为人类和卷尾猴在视觉上对不同空间频率的相对敏感度提供了新的信息。此外,他们认为人类和猴子的全局-局部视觉处理可以通过不局限于一个或另一个刺激结构水平的过程来调节。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial frequency and global-local visual processing in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Two experiments employing an identity matching-to-sample procedure were carried out to clarify the factors affecting global-local visual processing of capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) in comparison with humans. In the first experiment, we assessed the relative ability of the two species to discriminate high, medium, or low spatial frequencies (HSFs, MSFs, or LSFs). Then, in a second experiment, we determined if the use of a procedure designed to induce a bias toward attending given spatial frequencies could produce a top-down or selection-history modulation of global-local visual processing in capuchins and humans. In the first experiment, monkeys discriminated better HSFs. By contrast, humans discriminated better MSFs and LSFs. The second experiment showed an effect of SF processing on global-local processing in both species. However, this effect was confined to local trials only and occurred under different conditions in the two species. In monkeys, it occurred following a bias toward attending HSFs, whereas in humans, it occurred following a bias toward attending LSFs. These results provide new information about the relative sensitivity of humans and capuchins to different spatial frequencies in vision. Moreover, they suggest that global-local visual processing can be modulated in both humans and monkeys by processes that are not confined to attending one or the other level of stimulus structure. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Psychology publishes original research from a comparative perspective on the behavior, cognition, perception, and social relationships of diverse species.
期刊最新文献
Hearing "number"?: Relative quantity judgments through the echolocation by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). The impact of training method on odor learning and generalization in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Cross-modal perception of puppies and adult conspecifics in dogs (Canis familiaris). Putting the best foot forward: Limb lateralization in the Goffin's cockatoo (Cacatua goffiniana). Guatemalan beaded lizards (Helodermatidae: Heloderma charlesbogerti) navigate and follow a scent trail in maze tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1