针对特发性室性早搏特点的药物治疗比较:β受体阻滞剂还是钙通道阻滞剂?

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medeniyet medical journal Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532
Omer Faruk Baycan, Serdar Fidan, Fatma Betul Celik, Mustafa Adem Tatlisu, Serhan Ozyildirim, Mustafa Caliskan
{"title":"针对特发性室性早搏特点的药物治疗比较:β受体阻滞剂还是钙通道阻滞剂?","authors":"Omer Faruk Baycan,&nbsp;Serdar Fidan,&nbsp;Fatma Betul Celik,&nbsp;Mustafa Adem Tatlisu,&nbsp;Serhan Ozyildirim,&nbsp;Mustafa Caliskan","doi":"10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common arrhythmic condition. The first approach in patients with symptomatic and frequent PVC is medical treatment, primarily beta-blockers (BB) or calcium channel blockers (CCB), but it is still unclear which of the two should be chosen. This study investigated which drug treatment would be beneficial according to patient and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics in patients with idiopathic PVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with PVC who came to the cardiology outpatient clinic. Seventy-one patients were responsive to BB, and 85 were responsive to CCB. Their demographic and ECG characteristics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The male ratio was higher (p<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Although the mean heart rate was higher in BB responders (p<0.001), the initial PVC burden was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). The PVC QRS duration was longer in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Similarly, the coupling interval variability was higher in BB responders (p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation of clinical and ECG parameters in patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs may determine whether BBs or CCBs should be chosen as initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and establish their clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":37427,"journal":{"name":"Medeniyet medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/ef/medj-38-32.PMC10064106.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Medical Treatments According to the Characteristics of Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contractions: Beta-blockers or Calcium Channel Blockers?\",\"authors\":\"Omer Faruk Baycan,&nbsp;Serdar Fidan,&nbsp;Fatma Betul Celik,&nbsp;Mustafa Adem Tatlisu,&nbsp;Serhan Ozyildirim,&nbsp;Mustafa Caliskan\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common arrhythmic condition. The first approach in patients with symptomatic and frequent PVC is medical treatment, primarily beta-blockers (BB) or calcium channel blockers (CCB), but it is still unclear which of the two should be chosen. This study investigated which drug treatment would be beneficial according to patient and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics in patients with idiopathic PVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with PVC who came to the cardiology outpatient clinic. Seventy-one patients were responsive to BB, and 85 were responsive to CCB. Their demographic and ECG characteristics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The male ratio was higher (p<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Although the mean heart rate was higher in BB responders (p<0.001), the initial PVC burden was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). The PVC QRS duration was longer in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Similarly, the coupling interval variability was higher in BB responders (p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evaluation of clinical and ECG parameters in patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs may determine whether BBs or CCBs should be chosen as initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and establish their clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medeniyet medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/ef/medj-38-32.PMC10064106.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medeniyet medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medeniyet medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.00532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:室性早搏是一种常见的心律失常。对于有症状和频繁发生的PVC患者,第一种方法是药物治疗,主要是β受体阻滞剂(BB)或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB),但目前尚不清楚应该选择哪一种。本研究根据特发性聚氯乙烯患者的患者和心电图(ECG)特征探讨哪种药物治疗将是有益的。方法:回顾性分析156例心脏科门诊的聚氯乙烯患者。71例患者对BB有反应,85例患者对CCB有反应。比较两组患者的人口学特征和心电图特征。结论:特发性频发室性早搏患者的临床和心电图参数评估可能决定是否应选择BBs或CCBs作为初始治疗。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证我们的发现并建立其临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Medical Treatments According to the Characteristics of Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contractions: Beta-blockers or Calcium Channel Blockers?

Objective: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common arrhythmic condition. The first approach in patients with symptomatic and frequent PVC is medical treatment, primarily beta-blockers (BB) or calcium channel blockers (CCB), but it is still unclear which of the two should be chosen. This study investigated which drug treatment would be beneficial according to patient and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics in patients with idiopathic PVC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with PVC who came to the cardiology outpatient clinic. Seventy-one patients were responsive to BB, and 85 were responsive to CCB. Their demographic and ECG characteristics were compared.

Results: The male ratio was higher (p<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Although the mean heart rate was higher in BB responders (p<0.001), the initial PVC burden was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). The PVC QRS duration was longer in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Similarly, the coupling interval variability was higher in BB responders (p=0.006).

Conclusions: The evaluation of clinical and ECG parameters in patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs may determine whether BBs or CCBs should be chosen as initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and establish their clinical applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medeniyet medical journal
Medeniyet medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medeniyet Medical Journal (Medeniyet Med J) is an open access, peer-reviewed, and scientific journal of Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine on various academic disciplines in medicine, which is published in English four times a year, in March, June, September, and December by a group of academics. Medeniyet Medical Journal is the continuation of Göztepe Medical Journal (ISSN: 1300-526X) which was started publishing in 1985. It changed the name as Medeniyet Medical Journal in 2015. Submission and publication are free of charge. No fees are asked from the authors for evaluation or publication process. All published articles are available online in the journal website (www.medeniyetmedicaljournal.org) without any fee. The journal publishes intradisciplinary or interdisciplinary clinical, experimental, and basic researches as well as original case reports, reviews, invited reviews, or letters to the editor, Being published since 1985, the Medeniyet Med J recognizes that the best science should lead to better lives based on the fact that the medicine should serve to the needs of society, and knowledge should transform society. The journal aims to address current issues at both national and international levels, start debates, and exert an influence on decision-makers all over the world by integrating science in everyday life. Medeniyet Med J is committed to serve the public and influence people’s lives in a positive way by making science widely accessible. Believing that the only goal is improving lives, and research has an impact on people’s lives, we select the best research papers in line with this goal.
期刊最新文献
Alpha B-crystallin Ameliorates Imbalance of Redox Homeostasis, Inflammation and Apoptosis in an Acute Lung Injury Model with Rats. Clinical Characteristics of Children with Acute Post-Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis and Re-Evaluation of Patients with Artificial Intelligence. Comparative Effects of Candesartan Versus Enalapril on Apelin, Visfatin, and Lipid Levels in Non-obese Hypertensive Patients. Head and Neck Paragangliomas: 16-year Single-center Experience and Mini Review on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up. Response to the Commentary on "Clinical and Sonographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1