3D打印机制作手术引导片厚度对种植体植入精度的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral Implantology Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00179
Mehrdad Panjnoush, Yasaman Kheirandish, Reza Sharifi, Faeze Mirjalili
{"title":"3D打印机制作手术引导片厚度对种植体植入精度的影响。","authors":"Mehrdad Panjnoush,&nbsp;Yasaman Kheirandish,&nbsp;Reza Sharifi,&nbsp;Faeze Mirjalili","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This study aimed to assess the effect of slice thickness of 3D printer in fabrication of surgical guide (SG) on the accuracy of dental implant placement. Materials and Methods After preparation of two dry human mandibles, Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained, and the location and direction of implants in the edentulous ridge of the mandible were identified using Romexis software. Data in STL format were transferred to a 3D printer and two SGs with 50 µm and 100 µm thicknesses were fabricated for each mandible. Drilling was performed using two SGs. The pre- and post-intervention CBCT scans were superimposed to measure the magnitude of differences. The two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results No significant difference was noted in SGs with 50 and 100 µm thicknesses in the coronal and apical regions of the implants or the depth of drilling. However, the difference in angular deviation was statistically significant. Conclusion Considering the higher accuracy of SGs with 50 µm thickness (despite the presence of a significant difference in AD between the SGs with different thicknesses), it is recommended to use a SG with 50 µm thickness in cases where anatomical limitations exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of slice thickness of 3D printer in fabrication of surgical guide on the accuracy of dental implant placement.\",\"authors\":\"Mehrdad Panjnoush,&nbsp;Yasaman Kheirandish,&nbsp;Reza Sharifi,&nbsp;Faeze Mirjalili\",\"doi\":\"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction This study aimed to assess the effect of slice thickness of 3D printer in fabrication of surgical guide (SG) on the accuracy of dental implant placement. Materials and Methods After preparation of two dry human mandibles, Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained, and the location and direction of implants in the edentulous ridge of the mandible were identified using Romexis software. Data in STL format were transferred to a 3D printer and two SGs with 50 µm and 100 µm thicknesses were fabricated for each mandible. Drilling was performed using two SGs. The pre- and post-intervention CBCT scans were superimposed to measure the magnitude of differences. The two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results No significant difference was noted in SGs with 50 and 100 µm thicknesses in the coronal and apical regions of the implants or the depth of drilling. However, the difference in angular deviation was statistically significant. Conclusion Considering the higher accuracy of SGs with 50 µm thickness (despite the presence of a significant difference in AD between the SGs with different thicknesses), it is recommended to use a SG with 50 µm thickness in cases where anatomical limitations exist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估3D打印机在外科引导器(SG)制造中的切片厚度对种植体植入精度的影响。材料与方法制备2个干性人下颌骨后,采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(Cone-beam computed tomography, CBCT)扫描,利用Romexis软件识别下颌无牙嵴种植体的位置和方向。将STL格式的数据传输到3D打印机中,并为每个下颌骨制作两个50µm和100µm厚度的SGs。使用两种SGs进行钻井。将干预前和干预后的CBCT扫描叠加以测量差异的大小。采用Mann-Whitney U检验对两组进行比较。结果50µm和100µm厚度种植体冠、根尖区的SGs及钻孔深度无显著差异。然而,角偏差的差异有统计学意义。结论考虑到50µm厚度的SG精度更高(尽管不同厚度的SG在AD上存在显著差异),在解剖限制的情况下,建议使用50µm厚度的SG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of slice thickness of 3D printer in fabrication of surgical guide on the accuracy of dental implant placement.

Introduction This study aimed to assess the effect of slice thickness of 3D printer in fabrication of surgical guide (SG) on the accuracy of dental implant placement. Materials and Methods After preparation of two dry human mandibles, Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained, and the location and direction of implants in the edentulous ridge of the mandible were identified using Romexis software. Data in STL format were transferred to a 3D printer and two SGs with 50 µm and 100 µm thicknesses were fabricated for each mandible. Drilling was performed using two SGs. The pre- and post-intervention CBCT scans were superimposed to measure the magnitude of differences. The two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results No significant difference was noted in SGs with 50 and 100 µm thicknesses in the coronal and apical regions of the implants or the depth of drilling. However, the difference in angular deviation was statistically significant. Conclusion Considering the higher accuracy of SGs with 50 µm thickness (despite the presence of a significant difference in AD between the SGs with different thicknesses), it is recommended to use a SG with 50 µm thickness in cases where anatomical limitations exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Biomechanical Behaviors of Different Designs and Configurations of Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants With Finite Elements Analysis in Anterior Maxilla. Enhancing Precision and Efficiency in Fabricating Complete Arch Screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis: A Clinical Case Report Utilizing the Nexus iOS Scan Gauge System. Reconstruction of the Fully Edentulous Maxilla Using Sinus Grafts and Bone Expansion: A Retrospective Analysis of 50 Consecutive Cases. All-on-4 Concept With Use Of Zygoma Implants for Rehabilitation in the Severely Atrophied Maxilla With a Definitive Immediate Restoration. Clinical Performance of 170 Frictional Morse Taper Implants: 2 Years Follow-Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1