社区参与式研究(CBPR)的力量。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1037/prj0000568
Patrick W Corrigan, Madeline Oppenheim
{"title":"社区参与式研究(CBPR)的力量。","authors":"Patrick W Corrigan, Madeline Oppenheim","doi":"10.1037/prj0000568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is based on power as fundamental to doing research. It evolved as a way of \"knowing\" from the broader idea of natural science. While previously viewed as objective, natural science is now understood as, at least, partially socially constructed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>History of research and epistemology is reviewed in terms of science. More specifically, we delve into science as social construction and how this conceptually opens the door to considering power in its processes. We then unpack CBPR as one way to do mental health research that artfully weaves power into method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Natural science has evolved from believing scientism (i.e., the scientific method) is sufficient to describe physical and social phenomena to terms of social constructivism; namely, the social processes that impact investigators are necessary to understand science and its product. This highlights the role of power; namely, investigator choices about hypotheses, methods, analyses, and interpretations influence the products of individual studies. The recovery movement is the embodiment of power that significantly changed research and rehabilitation in mental health. CBPR has emerged to include people with lived experience in the research enterprise. CBPR is partnership among people with lived experience, health scientists, and service providers in all facets of doing research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Integrating CBPR into rehabilitation science has led to findings and actions that better serve community objectives. Continuing to weave CBPR into research and development will further enhance recovery in practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power of community-based participatory research (CBPR).\",\"authors\":\"Patrick W Corrigan, Madeline Oppenheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is based on power as fundamental to doing research. It evolved as a way of \\\"knowing\\\" from the broader idea of natural science. While previously viewed as objective, natural science is now understood as, at least, partially socially constructed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>History of research and epistemology is reviewed in terms of science. More specifically, we delve into science as social construction and how this conceptually opens the door to considering power in its processes. We then unpack CBPR as one way to do mental health research that artfully weaves power into method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Natural science has evolved from believing scientism (i.e., the scientific method) is sufficient to describe physical and social phenomena to terms of social constructivism; namely, the social processes that impact investigators are necessary to understand science and its product. This highlights the role of power; namely, investigator choices about hypotheses, methods, analyses, and interpretations influence the products of individual studies. The recovery movement is the embodiment of power that significantly changed research and rehabilitation in mental health. CBPR has emerged to include people with lived experience in the research enterprise. CBPR is partnership among people with lived experience, health scientists, and service providers in all facets of doing research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>Integrating CBPR into rehabilitation science has led to findings and actions that better serve community objectives. Continuing to weave CBPR into research and development will further enhance recovery in practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以社区为基础的参与式研究(CBPR)以权力为开展研究的根本。它作为一种 "认知 "方式,是从更广泛的自然科学理念中演变而来的。虽然自然科学以前被认为是客观的,但现在被理解为至少部分是由社会建构的:方法:从科学的角度回顾研究史和认识论。更具体地说,我们将深入探讨作为社会建构的科学,以及这在概念上是如何为考虑科学过程中的权力打开大门的。然后,我们将 CBPR 作为一种进行心理健康研究的方法,巧妙地将权力融入研究方法中:自然科学已经从相信科学主义(即科学方法)足以描述物理和社会现象发展到社会建构主义;即影响研究者的社会过程是理解科学及其产品的必要条件。这就凸显了权力的作用,即研究者对假设、方法、分析和解释的选择会影响个人研究的成果。康复运动是权力的体现,它极大地改变了心理健康的研究和康复。CBPR 的出现是为了将有生活经验的人纳入研究事业。CBPR是有生活经验的人、健康科学家和服务提供者在开展研究的各个方面的合作关系:将社区参与公共政策研究融入康复科学,可以得出更好地服务于社区目标的研究结果和行动。继续将 CBPR 纳入研究和发展将进一步促进康复实践。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The power of community-based participatory research (CBPR).

Objective: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is based on power as fundamental to doing research. It evolved as a way of "knowing" from the broader idea of natural science. While previously viewed as objective, natural science is now understood as, at least, partially socially constructed.

Method: History of research and epistemology is reviewed in terms of science. More specifically, we delve into science as social construction and how this conceptually opens the door to considering power in its processes. We then unpack CBPR as one way to do mental health research that artfully weaves power into method.

Results: Natural science has evolved from believing scientism (i.e., the scientific method) is sufficient to describe physical and social phenomena to terms of social constructivism; namely, the social processes that impact investigators are necessary to understand science and its product. This highlights the role of power; namely, investigator choices about hypotheses, methods, analyses, and interpretations influence the products of individual studies. The recovery movement is the embodiment of power that significantly changed research and rehabilitation in mental health. CBPR has emerged to include people with lived experience in the research enterprise. CBPR is partnership among people with lived experience, health scientists, and service providers in all facets of doing research.

Conclusions and implications for practice: Integrating CBPR into rehabilitation science has led to findings and actions that better serve community objectives. Continuing to weave CBPR into research and development will further enhance recovery in practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Harms of a single story: A researcher's personal narrative and plea for change. Consent to voluntary antipsychotic drug treatment-Is it free and informed? A multisite longitudinal evaluation of Canadian clubhouse members: Impact on hospitalizations and community functioning. Community as therapy: The theory of social practice. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) within the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation for serious mental illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1