基于社区的参与式研究的效用:提高少数民族群体的研究参与度。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1037/prj0000558
Camelia A Harb, Matthew J Taylor
{"title":"基于社区的参与式研究的效用:提高少数民族群体的研究参与度。","authors":"Camelia A Harb, Matthew J Taylor","doi":"10.1037/prj0000558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article conceptually examined the need for and utility of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches for increasing rates of engagement in psychological research among underserved minoritized ethnoracial groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article examined the literature for relevant studies examining rates of research engagement by minoritized ethnoracial groups, significant factors precluding research engagement, and the consequences of this disparity for mental health outcomes. The theoretical literature outlining the development and utility of alternative, community-based participatory research methods was included. Key features of CBPR were examined along with limitations of current approaches. A case study example of CBPR is provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of CBPR approaches has been documented to improve health outcomes, reduce stigma toward mental health research and treatment, and build the professional capacity of community partners, particularly among minoritized ethnoracial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>CBPR engagement practices are a means of reducing the mental health research gap for ethnic and racial minoritized groups. The use of such approaches in future research and practice will directly inform how existing psychological treatments may be modified per the needs of the patient, address long standing issues of cultural mistrust toward professional institutions, and reduce mental health stigma in underserved communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of community-based participatory research: Increasing research engagement among minoritized ethnoracial groups.\",\"authors\":\"Camelia A Harb, Matthew J Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/prj0000558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article conceptually examined the need for and utility of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches for increasing rates of engagement in psychological research among underserved minoritized ethnoracial groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article examined the literature for relevant studies examining rates of research engagement by minoritized ethnoracial groups, significant factors precluding research engagement, and the consequences of this disparity for mental health outcomes. The theoretical literature outlining the development and utility of alternative, community-based participatory research methods was included. Key features of CBPR were examined along with limitations of current approaches. A case study example of CBPR is provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of CBPR approaches has been documented to improve health outcomes, reduce stigma toward mental health research and treatment, and build the professional capacity of community partners, particularly among minoritized ethnoracial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>CBPR engagement practices are a means of reducing the mental health research gap for ethnic and racial minoritized groups. The use of such approaches in future research and practice will directly inform how existing psychological treatments may be modified per the needs of the patient, address long standing issues of cultural mistrust toward professional institutions, and reduce mental health stigma in underserved communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"22-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000558\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文从概念上探讨了以社区为基础的参与式研究(CBPR)方法的必要性和实用性,以提高未得到充分服务的少数民族群体参与心理学研究的比率:本文从概念上探讨了以社区为基础的参与式研究(CBPR)方法在提高未得到充分服务的少数民族群体参与心理学研究的比率方面的必要性和实用性:本文对相关文献进行了研究,考察了少数民族群体参与研究的比例、阻碍参与研究的重要因素以及这种差异对心理健康结果的影响。文章还收录了概述替代性社区参与式研究方法的发展和效用的理论文献。对社区参与式研究的主要特点以及当前方法的局限性进行了研究。还提供了一个 CBPR 案例研究:有资料表明,使用社区参与式研究方法可以改善健康状况,减少对心理健康研究和治疗的偏见,并提高社区合作伙伴的专业能力,尤其是在少数民族群体中:CBPR 参与实践是缩小少数族裔和种族群体心理健康研究差距的一种手段。在未来的研究和实践中使用这种方法将直接告知人们如何根据患者的需求修改现有的心理治疗方法,解决长期存在的对专业机构的文化不信任问题,并减少服务不足社区的心理健康耻辱感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The utility of community-based participatory research: Increasing research engagement among minoritized ethnoracial groups.

Objective: This article conceptually examined the need for and utility of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches for increasing rates of engagement in psychological research among underserved minoritized ethnoracial groups.

Methods: This article examined the literature for relevant studies examining rates of research engagement by minoritized ethnoracial groups, significant factors precluding research engagement, and the consequences of this disparity for mental health outcomes. The theoretical literature outlining the development and utility of alternative, community-based participatory research methods was included. Key features of CBPR were examined along with limitations of current approaches. A case study example of CBPR is provided.

Results: The use of CBPR approaches has been documented to improve health outcomes, reduce stigma toward mental health research and treatment, and build the professional capacity of community partners, particularly among minoritized ethnoracial groups.

Conclusions and implications for practice: CBPR engagement practices are a means of reducing the mental health research gap for ethnic and racial minoritized groups. The use of such approaches in future research and practice will directly inform how existing psychological treatments may be modified per the needs of the patient, address long standing issues of cultural mistrust toward professional institutions, and reduce mental health stigma in underserved communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Harms of a single story: A researcher's personal narrative and plea for change. Consent to voluntary antipsychotic drug treatment-Is it free and informed? A multisite longitudinal evaluation of Canadian clubhouse members: Impact on hospitalizations and community functioning. Community as therapy: The theory of social practice. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) within the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation for serious mental illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1