阿斯利康与国药疫苗接种后抗体反应的比较。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Iranian Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.22034/iji.2022.94298.2300
Enayat Anvari, Atefe Ghamar Talepoor, Mahsa Eshkevar Vakili, Narges Karimi, MohammadReza Ataollahi, Gelareh Najafi, Dieter Kabalitz, Iraj Ahmadi, Kurosh Kalantar
{"title":"阿斯利康与国药疫苗接种后抗体反应的比较。","authors":"Enayat Anvari,&nbsp;Atefe Ghamar Talepoor,&nbsp;Mahsa Eshkevar Vakili,&nbsp;Narges Karimi,&nbsp;MohammadReza Ataollahi,&nbsp;Gelareh Najafi,&nbsp;Dieter Kabalitz,&nbsp;Iraj Ahmadi,&nbsp;Kurosh Kalantar","doi":"10.22034/iji.2022.94298.2300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccines are the most effective way to prevent Coronavirus 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the antibody response of healthy individuals vaccinated with either the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) or the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine, in those who had no prior infection with SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty seven participants were included, of which 17 were administered the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine, while 20 were given the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels were checked 4 weeks after giving the first and the second dose of either vaccine using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine exhibited a higher levels of anti-(RBD) IgG compared with the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) in both the first (14.51 μg/ml vs. 1.160 μg/ml) and the second (46.68 μg/ml vs. 11.43 μg/ml) doses. About neutralizing Abs, the titer of the antibody was higher in the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) recipients than in the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) subjects after the first (7.77 μg/ml vs. 1.79 μg/ml, p < 0.0001) and the second dose (10. 36 μg/ml vs. 4.88 μg/ml, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recipients vaccinated with two doses of the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) had superior quantitative antibody levels than Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV)-vaccinated subjects. These data suggest that a booster dose may be needed for the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) recipients, to control the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":54921,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Antibody Responses Following Vaccination with AstraZeneca and Sinopharm.\",\"authors\":\"Enayat Anvari,&nbsp;Atefe Ghamar Talepoor,&nbsp;Mahsa Eshkevar Vakili,&nbsp;Narges Karimi,&nbsp;MohammadReza Ataollahi,&nbsp;Gelareh Najafi,&nbsp;Dieter Kabalitz,&nbsp;Iraj Ahmadi,&nbsp;Kurosh Kalantar\",\"doi\":\"10.22034/iji.2022.94298.2300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccines are the most effective way to prevent Coronavirus 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the antibody response of healthy individuals vaccinated with either the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) or the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine, in those who had no prior infection with SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty seven participants were included, of which 17 were administered the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine, while 20 were given the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels were checked 4 weeks after giving the first and the second dose of either vaccine using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine exhibited a higher levels of anti-(RBD) IgG compared with the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) in both the first (14.51 μg/ml vs. 1.160 μg/ml) and the second (46.68 μg/ml vs. 11.43 μg/ml) doses. About neutralizing Abs, the titer of the antibody was higher in the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) recipients than in the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) subjects after the first (7.77 μg/ml vs. 1.79 μg/ml, p < 0.0001) and the second dose (10. 36 μg/ml vs. 4.88 μg/ml, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recipients vaccinated with two doses of the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) had superior quantitative antibody levels than Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV)-vaccinated subjects. These data suggest that a booster dose may be needed for the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) recipients, to control the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22034/iji.2022.94298.2300\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22034/iji.2022.94298.2300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:疫苗是预防冠状病毒2型严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS-CoV-2)最有效的方法。目的:比较既往未感染SARS-CoV-2的健康人接种阿斯利康(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)或国药(BBIBP-CorV)疫苗后的抗体反应。方法:纳入37例受试者,其中阿斯利康(ChAdOx1) nCoV-19疫苗17例,国药(BBIBP-CorV)疫苗20例。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)技术,在接种第一剂和第二剂疫苗4周后检测SARS-CoV-2中和抗体和抗受体结合域(RBD) IgG水平。结果:阿斯利康(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)疫苗第一剂量(14.51 μg/ml vs. 1.160 μg/ml)和第二剂量(46.68 μg/ml vs. 11.43 μg/ml)的抗(RBD) IgG水平均高于国药(BBIBP-CorV)。在中和抗体方面,阿斯利康(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)和国药(BBIBP-CorV)第一次和第二次接种后的抗体滴度分别为7.77 μg/ml和1.79 μg/ml, p < 0.0001)高于国药(BBIBP-CorV)。36 μg/ml vs. 4.88 μg/ml, p < 0.0001)。结论:两剂阿斯利康(ChAdOx1 - nCoV-19)疫苗接种者的定量抗体水平高于国药(BBIBP-CorV)疫苗接种者。这些数据表明,为了控制COVID-19大流行,可能需要对国药控股(BBIBP-CorV)接种者进行加强剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Antibody Responses Following Vaccination with AstraZeneca and Sinopharm.

Background: Vaccines are the most effective way to prevent Coronavirus 2 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2).

Objectives: To compare the antibody response of healthy individuals vaccinated with either the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) or the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine, in those who had no prior infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: Thirty seven participants were included, of which 17 were administered the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine, while 20 were given the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels were checked 4 weeks after giving the first and the second dose of either vaccine using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique.

Results: The AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine exhibited a higher levels of anti-(RBD) IgG compared with the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) in both the first (14.51 μg/ml vs. 1.160 μg/ml) and the second (46.68 μg/ml vs. 11.43 μg/ml) doses. About neutralizing Abs, the titer of the antibody was higher in the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) recipients than in the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) subjects after the first (7.77 μg/ml vs. 1.79 μg/ml, p < 0.0001) and the second dose (10. 36 μg/ml vs. 4.88 μg/ml, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Recipients vaccinated with two doses of the AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) had superior quantitative antibody levels than Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV)-vaccinated subjects. These data suggest that a booster dose may be needed for the Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) recipients, to control the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Immunology
Iranian Journal of Immunology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Immunology (I.J.I) is an internationally disseminated peer-reviewed publication and publishes a broad range of experimental and theoretical studies concerned with all aspects of immunology.
期刊最新文献
IgG4-Related Disease in a 90-Year-Old Man with an 18-Year Disease Course: A Case Report. Comments on "Comparative Immunogenicity and Neutralization Potency of Four Approved COVID-19 Vaccines in BALB/c Mice". miR-196b-5p Affects Macrophage Polarization and Inflammation in Endometriosis. The Effect of Interferon Beta and Natalizumab on miR-20b Expression in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis is Potentially Mediated by Modulation of the Jak-STAT Signaling Pathway: A Case-control Study. Functional Property and Regulatory Mechanism of Macrophages in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: From Bench to Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1