战争和流行病不会影响德国人支持气候措施的意愿

IF 8.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1038/s43247-023-00755-z
Adrian Rinscheid, Sebastian Koos
{"title":"战争和流行病不会影响德国人支持气候措施的意愿","authors":"Adrian Rinscheid, Sebastian Koos","doi":"10.1038/s43247-023-00755-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do the impacts of acute crises influence citizens’ willingness to support different types of climate measures? An acute crisis can be understood either as an impediment or as an opportunity for climate change mitigation. In the first perspective, crisis impacts would create negative spill-overs and dampen citizens’ willingness to support climate action, while in the second perspective, the opposite would occur. Based on a survey experiment fielded in Germany in 2022 (n = 5438), we find that the economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War do not decrease behavioral willingness, while restrictions of civil liberties to combat the COVID-19 pandemic lead to higher climate support, underpinning the crisis-as-opportunity perspective. Willingness to support climate measures is strongest among (1) those most concerned about climate change, and (2) those who trust the government. We conclude that individuals do not wish climate change mitigation to be deprioritized on the back of other crises. The economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War and the impact of lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic do not negatively affect public support for climate measures and suggest a crisis-as-opportunity perspective, according to a 2022 survey experiment with 5438 German residents.","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War and pandemic do not jeopardize Germans’ willingness to support climate measures\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Rinscheid, Sebastian Koos\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43247-023-00755-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do the impacts of acute crises influence citizens’ willingness to support different types of climate measures? An acute crisis can be understood either as an impediment or as an opportunity for climate change mitigation. In the first perspective, crisis impacts would create negative spill-overs and dampen citizens’ willingness to support climate action, while in the second perspective, the opposite would occur. Based on a survey experiment fielded in Germany in 2022 (n = 5438), we find that the economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War do not decrease behavioral willingness, while restrictions of civil liberties to combat the COVID-19 pandemic lead to higher climate support, underpinning the crisis-as-opportunity perspective. Willingness to support climate measures is strongest among (1) those most concerned about climate change, and (2) those who trust the government. We conclude that individuals do not wish climate change mitigation to be deprioritized on the back of other crises. The economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War and the impact of lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic do not negatively affect public support for climate measures and suggest a crisis-as-opportunity perspective, according to a 2022 survey experiment with 5438 German residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Earth & Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Earth & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-00755-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-00755-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重危机的影响如何影响公民支持不同类型气候措施的意愿?严重危机既可以被理解为减缓气候变化的障碍,也可以被理解为减缓气候变化的机遇。从第一种角度来看,危机的影响会产生负面溢出效应,削弱公民支持气候行动的意愿,而从第二种角度来看,情况则恰恰相反。基于 2022 年在德国进行的一项调查实验(n = 5438),我们发现俄乌战争的经济影响并不会降低行为意愿,而限制公民自由以对抗 COVID-19 大流行则会导致更高的气候支持率,从而支持危机即机会的观点。支持气候措施的意愿在(1)最关注气候变化的人群和(2)信任政府的人群中最强。我们的结论是,个人不希望减缓气候变化的措施因其他危机而被置于次要地位。根据 2022 年对 5438 名德国居民进行的调查实验,俄乌战争的经济影响和 COVID-19 大流行期间封锁限制的影响不会对公众对气候措施的支持产生负面影响,并表明了危机即机会的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
War and pandemic do not jeopardize Germans’ willingness to support climate measures
How do the impacts of acute crises influence citizens’ willingness to support different types of climate measures? An acute crisis can be understood either as an impediment or as an opportunity for climate change mitigation. In the first perspective, crisis impacts would create negative spill-overs and dampen citizens’ willingness to support climate action, while in the second perspective, the opposite would occur. Based on a survey experiment fielded in Germany in 2022 (n = 5438), we find that the economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War do not decrease behavioral willingness, while restrictions of civil liberties to combat the COVID-19 pandemic lead to higher climate support, underpinning the crisis-as-opportunity perspective. Willingness to support climate measures is strongest among (1) those most concerned about climate change, and (2) those who trust the government. We conclude that individuals do not wish climate change mitigation to be deprioritized on the back of other crises. The economic implications of the Russo-Ukrainian War and the impact of lockdown restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic do not negatively affect public support for climate measures and suggest a crisis-as-opportunity perspective, according to a 2022 survey experiment with 5438 German residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communications Earth & Environment
Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
269
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.
期刊最新文献
Habitat suitability models reveal extensive distribution of deep warm-water coral frameworks in the Red Sea Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink Climate change scenarios forecast increased drought exposure for terrestrial vertebrates in the contiguous United States Unveiling the devastating effect of the spring 2022 mega-heatwave on the South Asian snowpack
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1