内布拉斯加州农村拉丁裔移民农场工人压力量表的改进。

J Kyle Haws, Arthur R Andrews, M Natalia Acosta Canchila, Athena K Ramos
{"title":"内布拉斯加州农村拉丁裔移民农场工人压力量表的改进。","authors":"J Kyle Haws,&nbsp;Arthur R Andrews,&nbsp;M Natalia Acosta Canchila,&nbsp;Athena K Ramos","doi":"10.1037/rmh0000202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Migrant Farmworker Stress Inventory (MFWSI) was developed to measure the distinct stressors faced by migrant farmworkers. The most appropriate measurement and factor structure, however, has been primarily examined with exploratory methods with no studies of confirmatory factor analyses to date. The current study built on prior exploratory factor analytic approaches using the MFWSI by applying confirmatory factor analyses and other tests of validity to better delineate the component parts of migrant farmworker stress that contribute to anxiety and depression. Participants were 241 Latino migrant farmworkers recruited from rural farmworker campsites in Nebraska. Neither of the previously identified factor structures fit the data well initially. Following model respecification, only three factors remained from the original exploratory approaches. These models produced both common and unique factors, which were combined to produce a four-factor model. Results suggest that rural migrant farmworker stress may operate with at least four distinct domains: 1) economic difficulties, 2) immigration and legal status, 3) parenting and child difficulties, and 4) social isolation and related challenges. Finally, only economic difficulties predicted depression and anxiety scores, such that those reporting more stress around economic difficulties reported higher depression and anxiety symptoms. Results point to the need for additional measurement and construct refinement to inform empirical, clinical, policy, and social advocacy work.</p>","PeriodicalId":74746,"journal":{"name":"Rural mental health","volume":"46 2","pages":"100-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267916/pdf/nihms-1767526.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining the Migrant Farmworker Stress Inventory among Latino Migrant Farmworkers in Rural Nebraska.\",\"authors\":\"J Kyle Haws,&nbsp;Arthur R Andrews,&nbsp;M Natalia Acosta Canchila,&nbsp;Athena K Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/rmh0000202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Migrant Farmworker Stress Inventory (MFWSI) was developed to measure the distinct stressors faced by migrant farmworkers. The most appropriate measurement and factor structure, however, has been primarily examined with exploratory methods with no studies of confirmatory factor analyses to date. The current study built on prior exploratory factor analytic approaches using the MFWSI by applying confirmatory factor analyses and other tests of validity to better delineate the component parts of migrant farmworker stress that contribute to anxiety and depression. Participants were 241 Latino migrant farmworkers recruited from rural farmworker campsites in Nebraska. Neither of the previously identified factor structures fit the data well initially. Following model respecification, only three factors remained from the original exploratory approaches. These models produced both common and unique factors, which were combined to produce a four-factor model. Results suggest that rural migrant farmworker stress may operate with at least four distinct domains: 1) economic difficulties, 2) immigration and legal status, 3) parenting and child difficulties, and 4) social isolation and related challenges. Finally, only economic difficulties predicted depression and anxiety scores, such that those reporting more stress around economic difficulties reported higher depression and anxiety symptoms. Results point to the need for additional measurement and construct refinement to inform empirical, clinical, policy, and social advocacy work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural mental health\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"100-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9267916/pdf/nihms-1767526.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

农民工压力量表(MFWSI)旨在测量农民工面临的不同压力因素。然而,迄今为止,最合适的测量和因素结构主要是用探索性方法进行检验的,没有验证性因素分析的研究。目前的研究建立在先前的探索性因素分析方法的基础上,使用MFWSI,通过应用验证性因素分析和其他效度测试来更好地描述农民工压力导致焦虑和抑郁的组成部分。参与者是来自内布拉斯加州农村农场工人营地的241名拉丁裔移民农场工人。之前确定的两种因子结构最初都不能很好地拟合数据。在模型重新规范之后,从最初的探索性方法中只保留了三个因素。这些模型产生了共同因素和独特因素,这些因素组合在一起产生了一个四因素模型。结果表明,农民工的压力可能至少在四个不同的领域发生作用:1)经济困难,2)移民和法律地位,3)父母和子女困难,以及4)社会孤立和相关挑战。最后,只有经济困难才能预测抑郁和焦虑的得分,因此那些报告经济困难压力更大的人报告了更高的抑郁和焦虑症状。结果表明,需要额外的测量和构建改进,以告知经验,临床,政策和社会宣传工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining the Migrant Farmworker Stress Inventory among Latino Migrant Farmworkers in Rural Nebraska.

The Migrant Farmworker Stress Inventory (MFWSI) was developed to measure the distinct stressors faced by migrant farmworkers. The most appropriate measurement and factor structure, however, has been primarily examined with exploratory methods with no studies of confirmatory factor analyses to date. The current study built on prior exploratory factor analytic approaches using the MFWSI by applying confirmatory factor analyses and other tests of validity to better delineate the component parts of migrant farmworker stress that contribute to anxiety and depression. Participants were 241 Latino migrant farmworkers recruited from rural farmworker campsites in Nebraska. Neither of the previously identified factor structures fit the data well initially. Following model respecification, only three factors remained from the original exploratory approaches. These models produced both common and unique factors, which were combined to produce a four-factor model. Results suggest that rural migrant farmworker stress may operate with at least four distinct domains: 1) economic difficulties, 2) immigration and legal status, 3) parenting and child difficulties, and 4) social isolation and related challenges. Finally, only economic difficulties predicted depression and anxiety scores, such that those reporting more stress around economic difficulties reported higher depression and anxiety symptoms. Results point to the need for additional measurement and construct refinement to inform empirical, clinical, policy, and social advocacy work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Store Safely: A firearm injury prevention strategy for rural families. Suicide Risk in U.S. Adults: Alcohol Misuse, Veteran Status, and Urbanization Comparison. Farmer Suicides Among States Reporting Violent Deaths, 2003 - 2017. Health Disparities among Rural Individuals with Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review. Rural Community Pharmacists' Perceptions of Implementing Mental Health Interventions to Reach Underserved Populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1