边缘型人格障碍患者自残和自杀行为的内隐认知

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836
Jakob Scheunemann , Simone Kühn , Sarah V. Biedermann , Michael Lipp , Judith Peth , Jürgen Gallinat , Lena Jelinek
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍患者自残和自杀行为的内隐认知","authors":"Jakob Scheunemann ,&nbsp;Simone Kühn ,&nbsp;Sarah V. Biedermann ,&nbsp;Michael Lipp ,&nbsp;Judith Peth ,&nbsp;Jürgen Gallinat ,&nbsp;Lena Jelinek","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit cognitions on self-injurious and suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Scheunemann ,&nbsp;Simone Kühn ,&nbsp;Sarah V. Biedermann ,&nbsp;Michael Lipp ,&nbsp;Judith Peth ,&nbsp;Jürgen Gallinat ,&nbsp;Lena Jelinek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的自杀内隐测量的表现与自杀性和非自杀性自伤有关。尽管边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的自残发生率很高,但之前没有任何研究评估过该患者组的内隐测量。方法40名BPD患者和25名健康对照者完成了三项内隐联想测试(IAT)(死亡词-Me/Others词、自残图片-Me/Other和自残图片-好/坏词)和一项潜意识启动任务(“死亡”/“成长”对阳性/阴性形容词分类速度的影响)以及精神病理学测量结果BPD患者的三项IAT评分均高于健康对照组。潜意识启动程序没有显示出组间差异。BPD患者的内隐测量与精神病理学之间的相关性大多较弱且不显著,只有少数例外:在IAT自我伤害-好/坏与终身非自杀性自我伤害频率之间、IAT自我损害-我/其他与抑郁症之间以及IAT死亡-我/他人与抑郁症之间观察到正相关。内隐测量之间的相关性从弱到中等。限制该研究仅为横截面研究,由于样本量有限,该研究的功率降低。结论正如预期的那样,BPD患者的IATs得分高于健康对照组,这表明他们对自残和死亡有更高的内隐自我认同感,对自残有更强的内隐积极态度。内隐和外显测量之间的相关性大多很弱,这与IATs在BPD患者中的判别值相悖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implicit cognitions on self-injurious and suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder

Background and objectives

Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.

Methods

Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).

Results

Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.

Limitations

The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.

Conclusions

As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
期刊最新文献
The effect of feedback in attention training on Attention Bias to Threat in individuals with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Examining the causal effects of social exclusion on shame and dissociative detachment Editorial Board Neurophysiological effects of cognitive behavioral therapy in social anxiety: An ERP study using a dot-probe task A multilevel examination of an inhibitory retrieval approach to exposure: Differentiating the unique and combined effects of multiple-context and multiple-stimulus cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1