Jakob Scheunemann , Simone Kühn , Sarah V. Biedermann , Michael Lipp , Judith Peth , Jürgen Gallinat , Lena Jelinek
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍患者自残和自杀行为的内隐认知","authors":"Jakob Scheunemann , Simone Kühn , Sarah V. Biedermann , Michael Lipp , Judith Peth , Jürgen Gallinat , Lena Jelinek","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit cognitions on self-injurious and suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Scheunemann , Simone Kühn , Sarah V. Biedermann , Michael Lipp , Judith Peth , Jürgen Gallinat , Lena Jelinek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791623000034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implicit cognitions on self-injurious and suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder
Background and objectives
Performance on implicit measures of suicidality has been associated with suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injury. Despite the high prevalence of self-harm in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), no previous study has assessed implicit measures in this patient group.
Methods
Forty patients with BPD and 25 healthy controls completed three implicit association tests (IATs) (Death words – Me/Others words, Self-Harm pictures – Me/Others, and Self-Harm pictures – Good/Bad words) and a subliminal priming task (effect of the primes “dying”/“growing” on the categorization speed of positive/negative adjectives) as well as measures of psychopathology (suicidal ideation, previous nonsuicidal self-injury, borderline symptomatology, depression, and hopelessness).
Results
Patients with BPD had higher scores on all three IATs than healthy controls. The subliminal priming procedure did not reveal group differences. Correlations between implicit measures and psychopathology among patients with BPD were mostly weak and nonsignificant with a few exceptions: Positive correlations were observed between IAT Self-Harm – Good/Bad and lifetime frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury, between IAT Self-Harm – Me/Others and depression, and between IAT Death – Me/Others and depression. Correlations between implicit measures were weak to moderate.
Limitations
The study was cross-sectional only, and the study had reduced power as the sample size was limited.
Conclusions
As expected, patients with BPD had higher scores than healthy controls on the IATs, which indicates higher implicit self-identification with self-harm and death as well as stronger implicit positive attitudes towards self-harm. The mostly weak correlations between implicit and explicit measures speak against the discriminative value of IATs in patients with BPD.
期刊介绍:
The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.