Amir H Sohail, Jeffrey Silverstein, Hazim Hakmi, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Yousaf B Hadi, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Muhammad Aziz, Hana Ajouz, David Shin
{"title":"单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术采用牵线木偶经脐入路是安全有效的,患者选择谨慎:与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析。","authors":"Amir H Sohail, Jeffrey Silverstein, Hazim Hakmi, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Yousaf B Hadi, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Muhammad Aziz, Hana Ajouz, David Shin","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1759772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b> The \"marionette technique\" for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. <b>Results</b> M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( <i>p</i> < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, <i>p</i> -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02-2.39). <b>Conclusion</b> With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. <b>Level of evidence</b> Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Amir H Sohail, Jeffrey Silverstein, Hazim Hakmi, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Yousaf B Hadi, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Muhammad Aziz, Hana Ajouz, David Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1759772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b> The \\\"marionette technique\\\" for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. <b>Results</b> M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( <i>p</i> < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, <i>p</i> -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02-2.39). <b>Conclusion</b> With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. <b>Level of evidence</b> Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:与四孔传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)相比,经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术(m-TLC)的“牵线木偶技术”为腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者提供了更好的美容和更短的术后恢复时间。我们比较了纽约一家三级医疗机构的m-TLC和CLC的结果。方法回顾性分析行m-TLC和CLC的患者资料。采用线性和逻辑回归对两组患者的住院时间(LOS)、手术时间和并发症进行比较。结果M-TLC组患者明显年轻化,以女性为主,体重指数较低。在接受m-TLC的患者中,既往腹部手术的可能性较低,非炎性病理的可能性较高(p -value p -value = 0.007);但多变量分析差异无统计学意义。在多因素分析中,两组患者的总并发症发生率无差异(优势比:1.63;95%置信区间为0.02-2.39)。结论通过谨慎的患者选择,m-TLC可提供更好的美容效果,且安全性相当。证据等级三级。
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Objectives The "marionette technique" for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. Results M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( p < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, p -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, p -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02-2.39). Conclusion With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. Level of evidence Level III.