词汇知识与二语通用语言能力:搭配能力和词汇量是词汇知识的决定因素。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognitive Processing Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2
Ahmed Masrai
{"title":"词汇知识与二语通用语言能力:搭配能力和词汇量是词汇知识的决定因素。","authors":"Ahmed Masrai","doi":"10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the contribution of receptive collocational competence and receptive vocabulary knowledge to L2 general language proficiency, and how well collocational knowledge develops in relation to knowledge of single-word items. To achieve this aim, measures tapping receptive collocation knowledge, receptive vocabulary knowledge and general language proficiency were administered to 86 Arabic-speaking learners of English at the university level. Results showed positive significant correlations of collocational competence (r = .78) and vocabulary knowledge (r = .70) with general language proficiency. Regression analysis revealed that collocational knowledge predicted the largest variance in general language proficiency, over and above, the prediction value of vocabulary knowledge. The results also showed that collocational knowledge develops as vocabulary knowledge increases, and that learners appear to first acquire collocations of items from more frequent word bands. Furthermore, the results indicated that knowledge of collocations and individual words within the third and fifth frequency levels predicted the largest variance in L2 general language proficiency. The findings of the study have important implications for the teaching and learning of L2 collocations and development of a learner's vocabulary knowledge, as these two variables appear to be determinant factors of L2 general language proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical knowledge and L2 general language proficiency: collocational competence and vocabulary size as determinants of lexical knowledge.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Masrai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the contribution of receptive collocational competence and receptive vocabulary knowledge to L2 general language proficiency, and how well collocational knowledge develops in relation to knowledge of single-word items. To achieve this aim, measures tapping receptive collocation knowledge, receptive vocabulary knowledge and general language proficiency were administered to 86 Arabic-speaking learners of English at the university level. Results showed positive significant correlations of collocational competence (r = .78) and vocabulary knowledge (r = .70) with general language proficiency. Regression analysis revealed that collocational knowledge predicted the largest variance in general language proficiency, over and above, the prediction value of vocabulary knowledge. The results also showed that collocational knowledge develops as vocabulary knowledge increases, and that learners appear to first acquire collocations of items from more frequent word bands. Furthermore, the results indicated that knowledge of collocations and individual words within the third and fifth frequency levels predicted the largest variance in L2 general language proficiency. The findings of the study have important implications for the teaching and learning of L2 collocations and development of a learner's vocabulary knowledge, as these two variables appear to be determinant factors of L2 general language proficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了接受性搭配能力和接受性词汇知识对二语一般语言能力的贡献,以及搭配知识在单字项目知识方面的发展情况。为达到这一目的,本研究对86名大学英语阿拉伯语学习者进行了接受性搭配知识、接受性词汇知识和一般语言能力的测试。结果显示,搭配能力(r = 0.78)和词汇知识(r = 0.70)与一般语言能力呈正相关。回归分析显示,搭配知识对一般语言能力的预测方差最大,高于词汇知识的预测值。结果还表明,搭配知识随着词汇量的增加而发展,学习者似乎首先从更频繁的单词带中获得搭配。此外,结果表明,搭配知识和第三和第五频率水平内的单个单词预测二语一般语言能力的最大差异。本研究结果对二语搭配的教学和学习者词汇知识的发展具有重要意义,因为这两个变量似乎是二语一般语言能力的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lexical knowledge and L2 general language proficiency: collocational competence and vocabulary size as determinants of lexical knowledge.

This study investigates the contribution of receptive collocational competence and receptive vocabulary knowledge to L2 general language proficiency, and how well collocational knowledge develops in relation to knowledge of single-word items. To achieve this aim, measures tapping receptive collocation knowledge, receptive vocabulary knowledge and general language proficiency were administered to 86 Arabic-speaking learners of English at the university level. Results showed positive significant correlations of collocational competence (r = .78) and vocabulary knowledge (r = .70) with general language proficiency. Regression analysis revealed that collocational knowledge predicted the largest variance in general language proficiency, over and above, the prediction value of vocabulary knowledge. The results also showed that collocational knowledge develops as vocabulary knowledge increases, and that learners appear to first acquire collocations of items from more frequent word bands. Furthermore, the results indicated that knowledge of collocations and individual words within the third and fifth frequency levels predicted the largest variance in L2 general language proficiency. The findings of the study have important implications for the teaching and learning of L2 collocations and development of a learner's vocabulary knowledge, as these two variables appear to be determinant factors of L2 general language proficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
期刊最新文献
Autistic and non-autistic adults use discourse context to determine a speaker's intention to request. Testing the dual-memory framework: individual differences in the magnitude of the retrieval practice effect and fluid intelligence The effect of cognitive intervention program on intelligence scores in preschool Choosing between bad and worse: investigating choice in moral dilemmas through the lens of control. The impact of cognitive flexibility on prospective EFL teachers' critical thinking disposition: the mediating role of self-efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1