麻醉相关气道患者安全事件的危险因素:2009 - 2022年单中心回顾性病例-对照分析

Q2 Medicine Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.24920/004130
Xue Zhang , Lingeer Wu , Huizhen Huang , Yuelun Zhang , Zhilong Lu , Yajie Tian , Le Shen , Yuguang Huang
{"title":"麻醉相关气道患者安全事件的危险因素:2009 - 2022年单中心回顾性病例-对照分析","authors":"Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingeer Wu ,&nbsp;Huizhen Huang ,&nbsp;Yuelun Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhilong Lu ,&nbsp;Yajie Tian ,&nbsp;Le Shen ,&nbsp;Yuguang Huang","doi":"10.24920/004130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Airway-related patient safety incident (PSI) has always been the top concern of anesthesiologists because this type of incidents could severely threaten patient safety if not treated immediately and properly. This study intends to reveal the composition, prognosis, and to identify risk factors for airway related incidents reported by anesthesiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All airway related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists in a Chinese academic hospital between September 2009 and May 2022 were collected from the PSI reporting system. Patients with airway incidents reported were matched 1:1 with controls based on sex and type of surgery. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to find risk factors associated with airway incident occurrence, and to evaluate influence of airway PSIs on patient prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,038 PSIs voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists during the study period, 281 cases (27.1 %) were airway-related incidents, with an overall reporting incidence of 4.74 per 10,000 among 592,884 anesthesia care episodes. Only ASA physical status was found to be significant independent predictor of these airway PSIs (<em>P</em> = 0.020). Patients with airway PSIs reported had longer extubation time (0.72 ± 1.56 d <em>vs.</em> 0.16 ± 0.77 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.29 to 0.82, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (1.63 ± 5.71 d <em>vs.</em> 0.19 ± 0.84 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.57 to 2.32, <em>P</em> = 0.001), longer post operative LOS (10.56 ± 13.09 d <em>vs.</em> 7.59 ± 10.76 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.41 to 5.53, <em>P</em> = 0.023), and longer total in-hospital LOS (14.99 ± 15.18 dra. 11.62 ± 11.88 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.46 to 6.27, <em>P</em> = 0.024).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This single-center retrospective case-control study describes the composition of airway-related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists within thirteen years. Airway incidents might influence patient prognosis by elongating extubation time and LOS. Airway PSI data were worth analyzing to improve patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 287-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Anesthesia-Related Airway Patient Safety Incidents: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Analysis from 2009 to 2022\",\"authors\":\"Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingeer Wu ,&nbsp;Huizhen Huang ,&nbsp;Yuelun Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhilong Lu ,&nbsp;Yajie Tian ,&nbsp;Le Shen ,&nbsp;Yuguang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.24920/004130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Airway-related patient safety incident (PSI) has always been the top concern of anesthesiologists because this type of incidents could severely threaten patient safety if not treated immediately and properly. This study intends to reveal the composition, prognosis, and to identify risk factors for airway related incidents reported by anesthesiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All airway related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists in a Chinese academic hospital between September 2009 and May 2022 were collected from the PSI reporting system. Patients with airway incidents reported were matched 1:1 with controls based on sex and type of surgery. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to find risk factors associated with airway incident occurrence, and to evaluate influence of airway PSIs on patient prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 1,038 PSIs voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists during the study period, 281 cases (27.1 %) were airway-related incidents, with an overall reporting incidence of 4.74 per 10,000 among 592,884 anesthesia care episodes. Only ASA physical status was found to be significant independent predictor of these airway PSIs (<em>P</em> = 0.020). Patients with airway PSIs reported had longer extubation time (0.72 ± 1.56 d <em>vs.</em> 0.16 ± 0.77 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.29 to 0.82, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (1.63 ± 5.71 d <em>vs.</em> 0.19 ± 0.84 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.57 to 2.32, <em>P</em> = 0.001), longer post operative LOS (10.56 ± 13.09 d <em>vs.</em> 7.59 ± 10.76 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.41 to 5.53, <em>P</em> = 0.023), and longer total in-hospital LOS (14.99 ± 15.18 dra. 11.62 ± 11.88 d, 95%<em>CI</em>: 0.46 to 6.27, <em>P</em> = 0.024).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This single-center retrospective case-control study describes the composition of airway-related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists within thirteen years. Airway incidents might influence patient prognosis by elongating extubation time and LOS. Airway PSI data were worth analyzing to improve patient safety.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 287-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929423000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001929423000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的气道相关患者安全事件(PSI)一直是麻醉医师最关心的问题,因为此类事件如不及时处理,将严重威胁患者的安全。本研究旨在揭示麻醉医师报告的气道相关事件的构成、预后和识别危险因素。方法收集2009年9月~ 2022年5月国内某学术医院麻醉医师报告的所有气道相关PSIs。报告气道事件的患者根据性别和手术类型与对照组进行1:1匹配。通过单变量和多变量分析,寻找与气道事件发生相关的危险因素,评估气道psi对患者预后的影响。结果在研究期间由麻醉医师自愿报告的1038例psi中,281例(27.1%)为气道相关事件,在592,884次麻醉护理事件中,总报告发生率为4.74 / 10,000。只有ASA身体状态是这些气道psi的显著独立预测因子(P = 0.020)。报告气道psi患者拔管时间较长(0.72±1.56 d比0.16±0.77 d), 95%CI: 0.29 ~ 0.82, P <0.001),较长的ICU住院时间(LOS)(1.63±5.71 d比0.19±0.84 d, 95%CI: 0.57 ~ 2.32, P = 0.001),较长的术后LOS(10.56±13.09 d比7.59±10.76 d, 95%CI: 0.41 ~ 5.53, P = 0.023),较长的住院总LOS(14.99±15.18 dra)。11.62±11.88 d, 95%CI: 0.46 ~ 6.27, P = 0.024)。结论:本单中心回顾性病例对照研究描述了13年来麻醉医师报告的气道相关PSIs的组成。气道事件可能通过延长拔管时间和LOS影响患者预后。气道PSI数据值得分析,以提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors for Anesthesia-Related Airway Patient Safety Incidents: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Analysis from 2009 to 2022

Objective

Airway-related patient safety incident (PSI) has always been the top concern of anesthesiologists because this type of incidents could severely threaten patient safety if not treated immediately and properly. This study intends to reveal the composition, prognosis, and to identify risk factors for airway related incidents reported by anesthesiologists.

Methods

All airway related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists in a Chinese academic hospital between September 2009 and May 2022 were collected from the PSI reporting system. Patients with airway incidents reported were matched 1:1 with controls based on sex and type of surgery. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to find risk factors associated with airway incident occurrence, and to evaluate influence of airway PSIs on patient prognosis.

Results

Among 1,038 PSIs voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists during the study period, 281 cases (27.1 %) were airway-related incidents, with an overall reporting incidence of 4.74 per 10,000 among 592,884 anesthesia care episodes. Only ASA physical status was found to be significant independent predictor of these airway PSIs (P = 0.020). Patients with airway PSIs reported had longer extubation time (0.72 ± 1.56 d vs. 0.16 ± 0.77 d, 95%CI: 0.29 to 0.82, P < 0.001), longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (1.63 ± 5.71 d vs. 0.19 ± 0.84 d, 95%CI: 0.57 to 2.32, P = 0.001), longer post operative LOS (10.56 ± 13.09 d vs. 7.59 ± 10.76 d, 95%CI: 0.41 to 5.53, P = 0.023), and longer total in-hospital LOS (14.99 ± 15.18 dra. 11.62 ± 11.88 d, 95%CI: 0.46 to 6.27, P = 0.024).

Conclusions

This single-center retrospective case-control study describes the composition of airway-related PSIs reported by anesthesiologists within thirteen years. Airway incidents might influence patient prognosis by elongating extubation time and LOS. Airway PSI data were worth analyzing to improve patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
期刊最新文献
UBE2C as an Immune-Related Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Study Based on Multiple Databases Linggui Zhugan Decoction Improves High Glucose-Induced Autophagy in Podocytes Alignment Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where do We Stand Today? Vascular Calcification: Where is the Cure? BILL Strategy: Points to Consider During the Performance and Interpretation of Critical Care Echocardiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1