优先研究治疗老年性听力损失的非处方(OTC)助听器。

IF 4.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2023-03-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879
Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma
{"title":"优先研究治疗老年性听力损失的非处方(OTC)助听器。","authors":"Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"4 ","pages":"1105879"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.\",\"authors\":\"Vinaya Manchaiah, De Wet Swanepoel, Anu Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1105879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1105879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

助听器是老年性听力损失患者最常用的治疗方法,然而,助听器的使用率却很低,这主要是由于助听器价格昂贵、耻辱感以及缺乏感知需求。为了解决可及性和可负担性问题,美国食品和药物管理局设立了一个新的非处方(OTC)助听器类别。听力损失患者和听力正常者都可以使用各种类型的听力设备,作为听力增强装置。助听器(即处方助听器、自配 OTC 助听器和预设 OTC 助听器)受 FDA 监管。本文的目的是:(a) 总结现有关于直接面向消费者(DTC)听力设备(如个人扩音产品(PSAPs))的研究,为非处方药服务提供模式提供参考;(b) 提供关于现有和正在进行的随机对照试验的最新情况,这些试验是针对目前市场上销售的非处方药助听器进行的;(c) 强调有必要立即对非处方药助听器和服务提供模式进行研究,为政策和临床护理提供参考。非处方药助听器对提高轻度至中度听力损失患者对助听器的使用率有何作用,还有待观察。然而,目前市场上关于非处方助听器各个方面的研究还很少。我们的结论是,必须优先开展高质量的独立研究,以补充非处方助听器制造商提供的证据,从而达到监管审批的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prioritizing research on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids for age-related hearing loss.

Hearing aids are the most commonly used treatment for people with age-related hearing loss, however, hearing aid uptake is low, primarily due to high cost of the device, stigma, and a lack of perceived need. To address accessibility and affordability issues, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration created a new over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid category. Various types of hearing devices are available for both individuals with hearing loss and for those with normal hearing, as hearing enhancement devices. Hearing aids (i.e., prescription hearing aids, self-fitting OTC hearing aids, and pre-set OTC hearing aids) are regulated by the FDA. The purpose of this article is to (a) provide a summary of existing research on direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices such as Personal Sound Amplification Products (PSAPs) that informs OTC service delivery models; (b) provide an update on existing and ongoing randomized controlled trials on currently marketed OTC hearing aids; and (c) highlight the need for immediate research on OTC hearing aids and service delivery models to inform policy and clinical care. It remains to be seen what effect OTC hearing aids have on improving the uptake of hearing aids by individuals with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. However, there is scant research on all aspects of OTC hearing aids that are currently on the market. We conclude that high quality independent research must be prioritized to supplement evidence provided by the OTC hearing aid manufacturers for regulatory approval purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multimodal frailty detection in primary care using a portable sensor-based platform: exploratory results. The utility of psychometric network analysis for the study of social isolation, loneliness, and social support in persons with cancer: methodology and future directions. Correction: Commentary: RNA transcripts in salivary extracellular vesicle cargo isolated from aged populations. Electronic health records reveals resilience patterns of cardiovascular disease in Basque centenarians. Association between maximal lower leg strength and static and dynamic balance as well as gait velocity in older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1